Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I'd like a game where we're more than a score ahead at the end'

By PA
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Northampton Saints director of rugby Phil Dowson feels his side must be more clinical after they nearly let a commanding lead slip late on in a 32-31 success over Newcastle Falcons in the Gallagher Premiership. Saints had appeared to be cruising on two occasions, going 13-0 up in the first half and leading 32-14 at the midpoint of the second half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Three unanswered Falcons scores cut the Saints lead to just a point with nine minutes to play, but they survived and moved back into the top four after a second consecutive bonus-point victory. “I’d quite like a game where we are more than a score ahead at the end!” joked Dowson, who is settling into his first season in charge as Northampton DoR.

“It was frustrating that we had so many opportunities to put that game away, but we didn’t. We let them come back into it and it becomes a flip of a coin and we will get turned over at times like we did at Quins and at Sale. We have got to make sure we are better in the last ten minutes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We went in 14-13 down after being dominant in the first half and we were not efficient enough at converting our pressure into points and we were too easy to score against, conceding way too many points. They are things we need to work on during the week and things we acknowledge are not good enough.”

Meanwhile, his opposite number Dave Walder was left to rue a disastrous start to the second period which ultimately cost his side, who stay ninth in the table. Both Sebastian de Chaves and Ben Stevenson were carded within the first seven minutes of the second half and Saints more than made use of their numerical advantage, cashing in on the scoreboard to build an ultimately unassailable lead.

Related

“I feel a slight frustration both with the inconsistency in the way we played and in terms of the way things were happening on the pitch,” he said. “The breakdown was a bit of a 50/50 call and I felt a couple of things could have gone our way that didn’t at key moments.

“My frustrations were because we were disappointing for the first 15 or 20 minutes and at the start of the second half, but we got ourselves back in the game. We got a couple of points from the game, but it was hugely frustrating there at the end.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m not sure where Seb (de Chaves) could go for his yellow but ultimately he has got out of the way because that is the law. Then, Ben Stevenson, it was a late change of direction because their back (Rory Hutchinson) put in a quick step. The disappointing thing was what happened at the start of the second half because we got our lineout launch wrong, kicked it out on the full and then got a yellow card.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search