Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'If we go over the salary cap, come and point the gun at myself... not anyone else'

(Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Pat Lam has shrugged off concerns that recruitment-hungry Bristol could break the Gallagher Premiership’s £7million salary cap, the Bears boss claiming his PRO12 title-winning stint at cash-strapped Connacht taught him how to live within a budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having already recruited Kyle Sinckler and Semi Radradra for a squad that already contains Charles Piutau, Lam caused a further stir earlier this week when he signed Fijian flyer Ratu Naulago from rugby league’s Hull.

In the wake of the Saracens salary cap controversy, which resulted in the London club’s automatic relegation to the Championship for 2020/21, there been increased focus on the spending habits of some other Gallagher Premiership clubs, including Bristol who had multiple stars on their roster before any of the recent signings were unveiled.

Video Spacer

Bristol boss Pat Lam guests on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod, the chart-topping podcast by Andy Goode and Jim Hamilton

Video Spacer

Bristol boss Pat Lam guests on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod, the chart-topping podcast by Andy Goode and Jim Hamilton

With only two marquee players exempt from the £7m salary cap limit, it has led to a debate on whether Bristol are playing by the rules which caught Saracens out. Lam, though, insists that they are, the coach vehemently defending his club’s eye-catching spending spree for the 2020/21 season.

Appearing on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod, Lam said everything is above board at the club he joined in 2017. “Bristol has never spent up to the cap and even currently with the squad, I know there has been a lot of speculation and rumour about our cap, but we’re still under the cap,” he told Andy Goode and Jim Hamilton.

“We have got a lot closer this time than we have in previous seasons but there is a lot of planning and working out, and players come and go. The squad I inherited, the money was heavily stacked to players who weren’t No1, players that had the experience but they weren’t playing or they were injured.

“So it was a complete overhaul of the structure to make sure that if you are going to be the No1s you have got to be world-class or heading towards world-class. Champions Cup is our ambition, to be that sort of team, to be the most dominant in Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Players playing for England would never play for England if our rugby programme was average, and then the home-grown players was important. Steve (Lansdown, the owner) and Chris (Booy, the chairman) gave me control over the academy to re-arrange the structure.

“Everything is geared now and the amount of homegrown boys that are coming through now… you have got to balance it all out, so the money is geared towards performance and what brings bums on seats, what can add value to our overall plan.

“I see the salary cap as vital but if we go over the salary cap, mate, come and point the gun at myself, Mark Tainton, our accountants and our board, not anyone else. At the end of the day, it’s our responsibility and I have worked in a place beforehand (Connacht) where I knew there was no way we were going to compete (financially) but we can work with what we can work with and be prudent with what we are doing.

“Growing the game is one side of it but the other side is when I got here everyone in the Premiership told me, ‘This is the best competition’. Now, remember I come from Super Rugby, also from the PRO12, PRO14 now, and there is always the question, which is the best?

ADVERTISEMENT

“Well, if you’re going to be the best you got to have the best players or have the ability to recruit the best players. With the marquee rule, I remember bringing in Charles Piutau and people said it was crazy.

“I brought Charles Piutau here not only for his rugby ability but I knew him personally. I knew he could add value on and off the field. I knew it wasn’t a gamble because it wasn’t about getting the best players, it was about getting the right players who will grow our game, grow our brand, grow our product.

“It’s the same with Radradra. I’m a big follower of NRL and saw him play, but I didn’t have any interest in bringing him here. It wasn’t until I coached the Barbarians and I saw him, got to meet him, built a relationship, saw what he could do.

“Also while I’m seeing everyone relaxing and enjoying themselves as it is the Baa-Baas, here’s this guy doing his pre-hab/rehab stretches, an ultimate pro. That’s why I had the interest to bring him here. He will bring massive value into our Premiership and into Bristol, but also grow our great game and help us be commercially viable as well.”

These new signings, such as England and Lions prop Sinckler, will be available to Bristol from July 1, boosting the squad that helped the club to reach third place in the league when the season was suspended in March. “We have been in touch with the guys that are coming in, making sure in the next four, five weeks that we are getting back a lot of these calls working through game plan stuff and then connections and having these guys involved.

“Mitch Eddie is an example. He’s finished at Northampton now. While he doesn’t start officially until July 1 he is a Bristol boy and he is already connected in some of the groups already. The boys are helping them out. It’s something we have got to plan for and we are pretty pleased with the guys that will come through.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search