Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'If England kept Sam Burgess, we could have won the World Cup in 2019'

A dejected Sam Burgess and Chris Robshaw of England look on during the 2015 Rugby World Cup Pool A match between England and Australia at Twickenham Stadium on October 3, 2015 in London, United Kingdom. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Eddie Jones will surely look back on his seven-year England tenure and have a lot of ‘what ifs’, but the biggest of all is probably something he had no control over whatsoever.

ADVERTISEMENT

While he might wish he picked a certain player in one match or played a different way in another, his biggest ‘what if’ could well be something that happened before he had even taken the reins at Twickenham.

Jones came in to save England following a disastrous World Cup campaign at the end of 2015, with his arrival coming just days after Sam Burgess’ departure back to the NRL. As a longtime admirer of rugby league, the Australian must ask himself what would have happened had he got a chance to work alongside the now-retired league superstar.

Video Spacer

Evan Roos on the advice he got from Eben Etzebeth

Video Spacer

Evan Roos on the advice he got from Eben Etzebeth

Jones has a healthy track record of working with league converts and getting the best out of them. His entire back three in the 2003 World Cup final had come from the NRL, and he was keen to fasttrack converts into his England team. Working with arguably the best rugby league player on the planet at the time would have been nothing short of a dream come true for Jones. But by the time he was signed, Burgess had already gone.

Joining Burgess’ former England rugby league teammate James Graham on The Bye Round Podcast recently, Jones looked over the “ridiculous” handling of the 2014 NRL winner by rugby union, before going on to explain what impact he would have made in his side, comparing him to England’s greatest ever import from league.

Related

“You just look at him, he’s a winner, isn’t he?” the 63-year-old said.

“Everywhere he goes he makes the team win. Tough, skilful. But they stuffed him up in rugby. They had him playing two positions. No one in rugby plays forward and back, because it’s too hard. So he was playing No6 for his club and No12 for England, it was just ridiculous to ask someone changing sports to play two positions. No one in rugby plays two positions. So they made it really difficult for him.

“If England had kept Sam Burgess, who knows, we could have won the World Cup in 2019, who knows? He’s a substantial player, a substantial player. You just watch what he does. If he had one position in rugby and he was playing that for his club and playing that for the nation, you don’t know what difference he could make.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m not saying we would have won the World Cup with him, but I’m saying potentially he could have been a point of difference. Like Jason Robinson in 2003 with England. Before they had Jason Robinson, they were a fairly solid team. But Jason Robinson gave them this X-factor that you couldn’t coach against because you didn’t know when he was coming in the back line- he didn’t know. They’re the players that you stay up at night and think ‘how are we going to close this bloke down?'”

Unfortunately for Jones, he explained how the horse had already bolted by the time he took on the job, and how there was no chance of a U-turn. “He’d already gone,” he said.

“And there was a bit of a sour relationship between him and rugby at that stage. I’ve caught up to him a few times since, but it was just too late.

“They hung him out to dry, and it would have been hard to get him back in any case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When asked where he would have played Burgess, Jones was swift to answer.

“No.12,” he said with no hesitation whatsoever. “No.12. It’s hard for a rugby league forward to play in the forwards in rugby. So if they’re a fast back row or a good back row, they can play No12 in rugby union.

“He would have been massive.”

Related

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

20 Comments
Z
ZamaZama 66 days ago

As die hond nie gek*k het nie, het hy die haas gevang.

R
RC 471 days ago

Eddie Jones has been a disaster as a rugby union coach of late, and has done indescribable damage to the game in Australia. He seems to be very enamoured with league, so why doesn’t he just go over to the NRL, tries to get a gig and leaves union for good? I bet many people in the game would be happy to see him go once and for all.

A
Andrew 471 days ago

While all the comments are probably true, so is the fact that Sam Burgess was hung out to dry by the RFU and blamed for the TEAM’s failure. (not England's best moment). Maybe there was better Union players available but Sam Burgess was brutal in defence. Against Wales, the Welsh players simply could not go through the centre ( including Jamie Roberts) and were staring defeat straight in the eye.

Given time and good coaching, he would have added ball carrying attack to his game (amongst other things) and with the support of his team mates, would have made the number 12 jersey his own, thereby terrifying all opposition (including the boks). I have no doubt.

But we're dealing with what ifs and a great opportunity missed (we worry about who will replace Tuilagi, but could he have ousted an on fire Sam Burgess from the team? Probably not). Please, RFU, don't continue making the same mistake. Let our world class players play for England. If you can’t sort out the premiership’s finances, at least allow our foreign based players to play for England. (the thought of Jack Willis lining up for France against England keeps me awake at night)

A
Aa 471 days ago

Are you out of your mind. One of the chief reasons England performed so badly in the 2015 RWC was that Burgess had been parachuted in to the team in preference. to players who could actually play rugby union. He left so quickly because it was recognised by all what what an appallingly embarrassing and expensive blunder it was by the RFU. On a par with keeping EJ on after 2019. England lost the final because they were beaten up in the scrum. What a stupid article.

J
JD 471 days ago

With all due respect, England were comprehensively outplayed by South Africa in 2019. There’s very little to add to that.

R
Roelof 471 days ago

IF you slap wings on pug it will fly.

IF you paint stripes on a donkey it becomes a zebra

IF you make up sh!t like this you look like a fool.

What a waste of time reading this nonsense. No matter what Eddie through at the 2019 final bok team, they would have kikcked ass. They showed up switched on and ready to win. The England team thought they only needed to show up. England was never going to win that final because the Bokke dont lose in WC finals. Klaar!

A
AP 471 days ago

I didn’t know Sam Burgess could scrummage! I guess his league background really prepared him for that.

D
DK 472 days ago

England got whipped properly in the 2019 final. There’s no chance one player would have changed that outcome.

f
fl 471 days ago

Its not just about changing one player. Bringing in Burgess changes the tactics considerably, as you would now have a crash-ball 12 instead of Owen Farrell. Eddie has argued that going with the 10-12 axis of Ford and Farrell was key to why England lost the final. Bringing in Burgess would also have changed England’s performance in games prior to the final, which would have had a knock on effect.


England were absolutely smashed by south africa in the final, but they beat new zealand the week before, and new zealand had beaten south africa earlier in the tournament, so it was a bit like rock-paper-scissors between them. Overall I do think South Africa were the best of the three teams and England were the worst, but the gap between them all was less big than the final suggested.


None of this is to say that England would have won if they had Burgess, but we ultimately don’t know either way. Maybe if the 2019 world cup was played back Burgess would lead England to victory or maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe Wales would beat south africa.

J
JJGhost 472 days ago

World Rugby privately acknowledged that England deserved a free try in the 2019 final to offset their Eddie Jones handicap.

A
Ace 469 days ago

🤣

T
Tony 472 days ago

“No one in rugby plays two positions” - mmm, there’s someone playing for Fiji and La Rochelle at 7 and 12 who is really rather good, among the best in the world!

f
fl 471 days ago

he doesn’t switch between positions though. Some seasons he plays 12, some seasons he plays 7, but its always one or the other.

R
Red 472 days ago

Says the man that played England players out of position on a whim. Says the man that stayed with the old guard with England but dropped the old guard Aussie players like a stone The one consistent thing about Eddie is he likes to be inconsistent.

When are RP going to forget about him and let him be.

f
fl 471 days ago

he didn’t play very many players out of position

U
Utiku Old Boy 472 days ago

Couldn’t agree more Red.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 2 hours ago
Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings

I wouldn’t rely on that alone.

Top 6 will get you a 1#ranking draw.

That’s fine. The draw for the 1/8; 1/4; 1/2 finals can then be worked out two ways.


So you will have 6 winners, 6 runners up, and 4 best third place to be in the 1/8 finals,

The soccer World Cup way is to base this solely on what happens in the Pools. So best 4 Pool winners will play best 4 third place and assuming the top 4 pool winners progress, they will avoid eachother until the semi. The problems with this is that Big teams will be encouraged to absolutely trash minnows raking up huge scores. Also, another one. Lets use the top 4 now. What if Australia and England don’t make the top 6 and they end up in Pools say with New Zealand and South Africa.

Lets assume they win their group but hard match means they finish 5th and 6th best pool winners. That could be an eventual quarter final line up of Top4s France-South Africa and NZ-Ireland or similar. Will they risk that again?


The way that rugby has done it so far is that they have generally made the draw to the final in advance. This is hugely advantageous including for fans. For example you could have the Boks based in Perth etc.

How do they manage this? They reward the top 4 ranked nations as the teams that will play the best 4 third places. Thats the only way. You base the quarters and semis on this also. That way you are guaranteed that the top4 are apart until the SF (contentious last time). Fans/TV stations. journos etc. cities can all plan etc.


It might be the soccer way but I wouldnt trust WR. The scheduling will as usual be completely opaque. But Top 6 needed, and top4 to hedge bets.

10 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Can 'great' Gibson-Park best 'freakish' Dupont in scrum-half clash for the ages? Can 'great' Gibson-Park best 'freakish' Dupont in scrum-half clash for the ages?
Search