Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'If he's ended up with a broken nose, there's some force there'

Jamison Gibson-Park /PA

The decision by referee Karl Dickson not to show Leinster scrumhalf Jamison Gibson-Park a red card in yesterday’s Heineken Championship Cup Round of 16 match with Connacht in Galway has drawn significant criticism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leinster went on the win the first-leg match after the yellow card in the 56th minute, but many think that Leo Cullen’s side were lucky not to be playing with 14 men for last third of the game.

The home fans erupted in anger after an upright Gibson-Park collided with Kieran Marmion’s face, resulting in a bloodied nose.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However Referee Dickson sin-binned the Leinster replacement after a lengthy TMO review, stopping short of giving the Ireland scrumhalf a straight red.

“He’s very lucky. There’s no doubt,” said former England lock Ben Kay, who was on comms. “If he’s ended up with a broken nose, there’s some force there.”

Leinster and Ireland great Brian O’Driscoll added: “It’s hard to see anything else but red here.”

“You can get a bloody nose and not have a huge level of force. You can. So I don’t think it should be dependent on whether there’s blood or not, but there’s a lot of blood,” said O’Driscoll. “He’s very lucky. There’s no doubt he’s very lucky. Another referee in the same position would give a red card.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“How in hell has Dickson talked himself down to a yellow?,” Tweeted Iain Hay. “There is a high degree of danger when shoulder meets face, it’s happened because Gibson-Park didn’t bend, and Marmion’s had his nose burst.”

The Loose Head wrote: “Yes, Marmion is falling, but it’s the fact JGP doesn’t look to wrap. Negates any mitigation. Tucks the shoulder and makes the hit.”

Walesonline’s Simon Thomas wrote: “Accepts the tackle” is a new one in the head contact decision-making process. Looked like a nailed on red to me. Gibson-Park was indeed very lucky.

Others felt the yellow for the New Zealand-born halfback was fair. One account observed: “Twitter should let me auto block anyone that thinks Gibson-Park should’ve been red-carded last night. Already fed up reading bloody nose = lethal force”

ADVERTISEMENT

Given the significant scale of the controversy around the decision, a citing for Gibson-Park will likely settle the matter.

Connacht head coach Andy Friend didn’t think it warranted a red card. “I thought it was a yellow,” he said afterwards. “I think there’s so much conjecture around these things at the moment.

Related

“To me, there was one angle that made it look not good.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search