Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

If not a first-five, then who will replace McKenzie in the All Blacks?

Damian McKenzie is as potent an attacking 15 as there is in the modern game. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The news of the ACL injury that left Damian McKenzie’s World Cup hopes in tatters has opened the door to a raft of speculation as to who could replace him in the All Blacks‘ squad for the tournament in Japan later this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

As a player that covers both first-five and fullback, RugbyPass has delved into potential replacement in both areas, providing left-field solutions in both Hayden Parker at first-five, and Will Jordan at fullback.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwTitVgAMZZ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

It’s a predicament that has led to many names being thrown around as potential replacements for McKenzie, but hints from All Blacks selector Grant Fox indicate that his side could head to the World Cup without a third-choice first-five behind Beauden Barrett and Richie Mo’unga.

“The way the draw sits, will a first-five get a lot of rugby anyway?” he asked when quizzed on the playmaking situation on Radio Sport.

“Possibly not. Japan is only ten and a half hours away, it’s not hard to get someone up there.

“You need someone [at first-five] to cover those middle two pool games [Canada and Namibia]. Could we get away without a specialist? Possibly.

“Is that risky? Yes. We can only pick 31 so you’ve got to compromise somewhere. Do we compromise at 10, nine or somewhere else?

“We are pretty clear on thought at the moment but it’s something we don’t want to divulge too much.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You’ve got to worry about your injuries. If you get a late injury before a big game, you are running a hell of a risk.

“Compromise and risk become part of your discussion and we’ve just got to deal with it. But it is a lot easier to get a player to Japan if needed, compared to the UK in 2015.”

With Fox publicly questioning the value of having a third first-five with the services of McKenzie unavailable to the side, the prospect of having Parker, or any other pivot who has been mentioned as a possible replacement, including Otere Black, Brett Cameron, Mitch Hunt, Josh Ioane, Marty McKenzie, Dan Carter and Aaron Cruden, has been significantly diminished.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwYXFnZA4OZ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, it appears a fullback could be called into the squad in place of McKenzie, with the proximity of Japan close enough to keep a third first-five on stand-by should he be required.

So, if it there is to be no first-five in this year’s World Cup squad, the who are the candidates to replace McKenzie at fullback?

Given that just two first-fives – Barrett and Mo’unga – are likely to be selected, that opens up an additional spot elsewhere in the squad, which could be utilised in the outside backs given the absence of McKenzie.

That means that the number of outside backs in the squad would increase from four to five, with Rieko Ioane and Ben Smith the only solidified selections prior to the McKenzie injury.

If he wasn’t considered a solidified option before McKenzie’s ACL rupture, then Jordie Barrett’s name must surely be firmly inked into the team sheet due to his versatility and broad skill set.

That leaves two remaining outside back slots to be sewn up, and there are a vast array of contenders competing to fill those spots.

George Bridge and Waisake Naholo loom as the favourites to take those last two spots, as both were included in the All Blacks’ recent ‘foundation day’ camp held in Wellington earlier this month.

Bridge has proven to be a handful for opposition defences in Super Rugby recent years thanks to his speed and elusive ball-running, while Naholo is a well-known power runner and has a deft finishing ability that has made him the Highlanders’ all-time leading try-scorer.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that either player is guaranteed a spot in the national set-up, though.

While he has impressed for the Crusaders this year and has test match experienced via last year’s clash against Japan, Bridge has been suffering from a knee/hamstring injury for about a month now, which could be of some concern for the All Blacks selectors, and could put him under pressure to win a starting spot back from teammates who have shone in his absence.

Those teammates will also be piling the pressure on Naholo, who had been badly out of form for the Highlanders and was yet to score this year before sustaining an MCL injury that has also seen him sidelined for a month.

The selectors know the ball-carrying power that the 27-year-old possesses, as well as the to-end speed he has displayed over the course of his professional career, but if his decline in form continues as the World Cup nears, questions will need to be asked if his imminent selection can be validated.

Outside of those two, young Crusaders trio Braydon Ennor, Will Jordan and Sevu Reece have all been in sparkling form, as has Worcester-bound Blues fullback Melani Nanai, while others such as Nehe Milner-Skudder, Chase Tiatia and Matt Duffie can only be considered outside chances at this stage.

One player who has stood out thanks to not only his form but also his positional flexibility is Crusaders fullback David Havili.

A three-test All Black, Havili hasn’t featured in the national side since 2017, but has been stupendous for the back-to-back reigning Super Rugby champions as they pursue a second-ever hat-trick of titles.

The 24-year-old has been difficult to bring down for opposition defenders, as shown in his season statistics, which shows he places in the competition’s top 10 for line breaks and is second for tackle busts.

With a low error rate and a booming punt which has been used on occasion for the Crusaders, Havili presents a case for being not only a safe and secure option with test match experience, but also an option that is in form and has proven his ability to successfully take on defenders when required.

What’s more is that he doesn’t just cover the outside back roles of fullback and wing, but he is also a proven operator in the midfield during his time in the Mitre 10 Cup with Tasman, a side of which he has also goal kicked for.

Havili’s ability to play at both second-five and centre, as well as wing and fullback, could be the point of difference between him and the rest of the competition should selections in the outside backs become tight, as they are expected to be.

Fox indicated towards the idea of having someone play out of position at first-five for pool matches against Canada and Namibia in order to prevent Barrett and Mo’unga from burning out or picking up needless knocks and bruises, and with Havili’s wide skill set and positional versatility, he could be the man to fill that role.

However, Jordie Barrett possesses similar attributes, and with his position in the squad firmly entrenched as a result of McKenzie’s injury, the All Blacks selectors may not want more than one utility option in place of a specialist outside back.

So, as it stands, Bridge and Naholo lead the race for the two final positions in the outside backs department.

But, through a raft of contenders at Super Rugby level, headlined by Havili, the race for a World Cup spot is still wide open, and the winners still have a long way to go yet before anything is decided.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search