Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'If we can’t get that right there must be something wrong with us'

(Photo by Oisin Keniry/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Alan Gilpin stepped off the plane in Paris this week with a real spring in his walk. Just 100 days remain before the latest Rugby World Cup jamboree swings into action, host nation France taking on the All Blacks in their Stade de France lair. The portents are great: 2.5million tickets sold for the 48 matches across nine cities, stats that have the tournament poised to break the attendance record set eight years ago by England 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 50-year-old was just getting warmed up within the World Rugby organisation at that time when the All Blacks were beating the Wallabies in the final at Twickenham.

Having spent nine years at IMG negotiating the commercial rights across three Rugby World Cups, it was 2014 when Gilpin officially joined the rugby federation, going on to become its chief operating officer (COO) and Rugby World Cup MD in 2016 and then CEO in 2020 following the departure to NFL of Brett Gosper.

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

In public, rugby fans would recognise him as the official who took the lead in managing the delicate situation of the typhoon that cost the 2019 tournament in Japan three matches. That crisis, though, couldn’t compare to the world-shutting pandemic that followed.

That should have been a disaster for the planning of the 2023 finals in France. And yet, there was Gilpin with a big smile on his face in recent days, pressing the flesh with all and sundry in the comforting knowledge that things have apparently never looked so good 100 days out from the quadrennial festival.

Related

What gives? Ironically, what assisted long-term was the World Rugby decision in November 2017 to hand France the hosting rights. That process was much criticised, South Africa and Ireland dissatisfied with how it all played out in the basement of a plush Kensington hotel in London. Its legacy was that World Rugby would never again use that particular process for anointing its World Cup bid winners.

However, council’s decision to vote for the French was unwittingly proven excellent when it came to ensuring the pandemic didn’t slam the brakes on preparing for the upcoming finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked by RugbyPass about why World Rugby are in such rude health 100 days out from France 2023 despite the pandemic, Gilpin enthused: “Great question. Going back to 2017 when we were at the point of selecting the host for 2023, we were in a contest between France, Ireland and South Africa and we were very blessed at that point to have three potential hosts who we knew could deliver an outstanding tournament.

“Great infrastructure, great kind of rugby strongholds. You come through that and France were awarded the hosting rights. Part of the answer to your question is we did great early work with France, so it is a tribute to the organising committee.

“They put a lot of great work in place in 2018 and 2019 before the pandemic hit – and then we have been lucky because France is a fantastic hosting nation whether you are looking at rugby in the past, the Euros (in football), preparing for the Paris 2024 Olympics.

“It is a great nation from a sporting and hosting perspective. Whether you are dealing with the government, whether you are dealing with the French organsing committee who have been great partners for us, whether you are dealing with host cities and venues, we are dealing with people who have got a hell of a lot of experience of putting on big events and that really helps when you are in those challenging circumstances you have with covid.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our confidence in them and their confidence in their ability in being able to deliver has been really strong throughout and we are fortunate that even in those very difficult times in 2020, 2021, 2023 seemed like far enough away that we were confident that we would be in a position to get to where we are now which is 100 days out from a fantastic tournament. Yes, it’s a great question because it has been a preparation period like no other.”

The off-field business of rugby isn’t the only aspect that is nicely approaching the crest of a wave in a timely fashion. Test rugby – and the sport in general – was a tough spectacle during the pandemic. Behind closed doors matches didn’t generate an inspired atmosphere and the sport became dominated by defence.

Related

Now, though, attack is wielding the upper hand with stadiums packed to the rafters and it bodes well for some grippingly creative rugby to unfold across the seven weeks of the tournament in France. Gilpin, no more than the rest of the rugby world, is relishing the potential drama that could materialise.

“It’s interesting, and we have seen it across a number of sports: the on-field performance was challenging in the pandemic at a time when you haven’t got crowds there inspiring and creating that great stage, but rugby globally at every level has come roaring back,” reckoned the World Rugby CEO.

“We are seeing some of the best, most entertaining, compelling rugby we have seen for a very long time and we would like to think we have helped enable that as a sport by being braver, being more innovative, spending more time looking at and talking about the shape of the game and getting every part of the rugby ecosystem across coaches, players, medics, lawmakers together and try and innovate.

“Some of the stuff we are doing around the foul play review bunker for TMOs is part of that and again, how do we speed the game up, how do we make sure we have got consistency in decision making?

“We are trialling more and evolving more and evolving more quickly than ever before. That is not all going to be at the World Cup this year, but the direction of travel really supports the game becoming faster, more compelling, more ball in play and more enjoyable to watch and play hopefully.”

Related

With demand for France 2023 tickets unprecedented, and with the women’s and sevens games set to accelerate appeal in the next year, is rugby is in a terrific spot to fire up the imagination, not just of the avids who follow every kick and pass but of people who haven’t come across the sport before?

“Absolutely,” replied Gilpin. “We have got this incredible opportunity as a sport in the next 12 to 15 months. I can’t overemphasise it enough, France will be an amazing host nation, with great excitement, shaping up to be a brilliant tournament.

“We are launching WXV in the women’s game, a chance to build on an exceptional, really special women’s rugby World Cup in New Zealand last year. WXV will be about building the competitiveness of the women’s game. We are reimagining, relaunching our World Sevens Series later in the year – it’s a quiet back half of the year for us!

“And then we play forward not only into the Olympic Games next year in Paris with the rugby sevens which will again be part of a brilliant Olympics and again because of France and Paris as a host we will have spectacular crowds, see the best of sevens, but we are also already incredibly excited about the World Cup 2025 in England and the moment that will give us in this journey in the women’s game.

“So, we have got a great opportunity with the sport. With the sport growing and with this enthusiasm around the sport the way it is being played, if we can’t get that right on this big stage there must be something wrong with us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search