Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I'm not saying we didn't have the right mindset': What the All Blacks have changed heading into Bledisloe II

New Zealand's Ofa Tu'ungafasi. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

If there is a metaphor for the expected change in the All Blacks for the second Bledisloe Cup Test, it’s Ofa Tu’ungafasi’s haircut.

ADVERTISEMENT

The loosehead prop was a strong performer in a dominant All Blacks scrum in the first test at Wellington, but he stood out more for his outrageously-bad haircut which can only be described as a half-afro.

Given that his brother is a barber, the question is how Tu’ungafasi ended up with the front of his head closely shaved while the back resembled a peacock’s tail.

Video Spacer

The Aotearoa Rugby Pod discuss who they have picked for the Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week from the first Bledisloe test between the All Blacks and the Wallabies.

Video Spacer

The Aotearoa Rugby Pod discuss who they have picked for the Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week from the first Bledisloe test between the All Blacks and the Wallabies.

“I had the same haircut through Super Rugby and some Mitre 10 Cup games even though my wife and my mum were on at me to shave it off,” the prop said on Sky Sport’s The Breakdown.

“But coming into the All Blacks and with some young boys coming through, I wanted to show that just because you’re in this environment you don’t have to change … but one test was enough and I got rid of it.”

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Tu’ungafasi will sport a closely-shaved head for the second Test in Auckland on Sunday – it’s a pointer to the way the All Blacks want to de-clutter their collective heads after they were outplayed in the opening test but hung on for a 16-all draw.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have to be mentally there on the day,” Tu’ungafasi said. “We saw Australia had the right mindset coming into the game.

“There were a lot of factors playing a part in that – the skipper playing his 100th, not having won the (Bledisloe) Cup for a long time … I’m not saying we didn’t have the right mindset but they turned up to play with intent.”

All Blacks selector Grant Fox said while the players were “up” for the game, they possibly had too much going on in their minds as they prepared for a relatively unknown Australian team and with a new coaching panel of their own.

“The boys were up, they were in a really good space but part of what happens with a short preparation time is that there’s quite a bit of information goes in – it’s a new team, new plans, new calls, so it does create a bit of clutter and the players don’t have as much clarity.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’ve got a little bit more clarity this week so hopefully they can clear their minds and play what’s in front of them.”

One of the symptoms of the cluttered thinking came when the All Blacks had a chance to push for a win after the Reece Hodge penalty hit the post.

Camped on the Australian line, New Zealand went wide and a bad pass from Jordie Barrett meant the end of their winning hopes.

“You don’t train these scenarios a lot because you expect players to take ownership of it,” Fox said.

“Jordie saw an opportunity, but unfortunately his [received] pass wasn’t very good and that went begging. He made a call that he thought was on.

“If we’d stayed near the goalposts hammering away we’d give ourselves three options – one, we might get across and score if we’re lucky, two, we might get a penalty or three, you can sit in the pocket for a drop goal. By going wide we negated the three options we had.

“But the guys will learn and if we get in that situation again we’ll get something different.”

– Michael Donaldson

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search