Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I'm not sure if big contact is a penalty these days but that's the wrong decision' - Michael Cheika blasts Taniela Tupou sin binning

Michael Cheika. (Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Two bombed tries and a controversial yellow card resulted in the Wallabies again leaving Ellis Park empty-handed after a 35-17 loss to South Africa in their Rugby Championship opener.

ADVERTISEMENT

Australia were looking for their first win in Johannesburg since 1963 and had a golden opportunity, with the Springboks fielding a weakened side on Saturday night.

However, livewire halfback Herschel Jantjies scored a try in each half in a memorable Test debut for South Africa.

Wallabies coach Michael Cheika slammed a decision to yellow card prop Taniela Tupou for a late, no-arms tackle; with the Springboks scoring 14 points in his absence.

“I make it as the wrong call,” Cheika said.

“The other guy [Springbok] should have been sent to the sin-bin for a shoulder charge.

“The fourth official [should have] focused on the green guy who came in with a shoulder charge and then Taniela came in after that to get him, with his arms wrapped at the right height.

“I’m not sure if big contact is a penalty these days but that’s the wrong decision.”

Taniela Tupou in action against the Springboks. (Photo by Lee Warren/Gallo Images/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies were in the hunt early but two blown tries in the first half proved crucial.

Australia trailed 14-10 at halftime after a try by backrower Lukhan Salakaia-Loto was denied after the last pass from Samu Kerevi was ruled forward by the television match official.

Winger Dane Hayley-Petty, who scored Australia’s opening try, could have added a second and given his team the lead but knocked the ball on as he dived on it over the line.

Skipper Michael Hooper left a further three points on the field when he turned down an easy penalty shot to chase a try just before the main break.

The Wallabies’ second half didn’t go to plan.

In addition to the yellow card, they lost veteran prop James Slipper to a head knock nine minutes in, which gave rookie Harry Johnson-Holmes his first cap.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although behind on the scoreboard, there was a lot to like about the Wallabies, particularly in the first half, with some excellent defence and creative attack that challenged the Springboks, when they went wide.

Halfback Nic White, in his first Test in four years, was sharp, Tom Banks impressed in his first start replacing Israel Folau at fullback while backrower Isi Naisarani also looked strong.

Cheika believes there’s plenty to build on and their ball in hand attack would continue to improve.

“I was happy with a lot of the things we had been working on,” Cheika said.

“I know it was five tries (conceded), but our defence was good.

“But in that second half when we didn’t have a lot of the ball, we were just a bit loose with it when we did have it and that gave the momentum back to the other team.”

Cheika was pleased with the chances his men were able to create despite the Springboks’ rush defence.

“We knew they would come with that hard defence but we still made a significant number of line-breaks,” he said.

“When teams rush on you like that, you are going to get slammed sometimes, it’s the nature of the beast, but sometimes you can pick it apart and we did that.

“There is a commitment to playing that way, both in attack and in defence, and it will build as the season goes on.”

Australia host Argentina, who lost to New Zealand 20-16, in Brisbane next Saturday.

AAP

Foden: Stateside – A RugbyPass Original documentary:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 7 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search