Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I'm not sure whether we will get back to those days of exceptional or extraordinary scores, I don't think that's good for the game either'

(Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

England defence coach John Mitchell believes there will be tweaks introduced around the breakdown that will see rugby create more continuity and dilute the contestability that has affected the attacking side of the sport, especially in northern hemisphere Test games in recent weeks.    

ADVERTISEMENT

Test rugby in Europe has come in for massive criticism for its low frills conclusion to the 2020 Six Nations and well as the generally dull fare on offer in the Autumn Nations Cup. 

As the England defence coach, Mitchell is partly responsible for this attacking malaise that has many fans complaining about a lack of entertainment, but he feels it won’t take much to loosen up the game and ensure people get to see a more enjoyable spectacle.  

Video Spacer

England have started preparations for next Sunday’s Autumn Nations Cup final

Video Spacer

England have started preparations for next Sunday’s Autumn Nations Cup final

“Experience informs me that the game tends to go in cycles,” said Mitchell ahead of next Sunday’s Nations Cup final featuring England versus France, a match where he claimed Eddie Jones’ squad had no other injury concerns following the loss of Jonathan Joseph.    

“It has been quite a defensive cycle for a period of time generally after World Cups, there are some tweaks to make sure that attack prevails. I’m sure that will follow at some point. When you get closer to a World Cup you go back into a defence cycle so I’m sure we will get some freedom for attack to present itself again. When that will be I’m not sure. 

“There is a number of people talking about certain areas that can be fixed or tweaked to create more fluency in attack. The game always has a few tweaks here and there to make sure we calibrate towards the right balance of exciting football versus contestability.

“It’s just small tweaks around the breakdown (that are needed). The breakdown is always the area where you either create continuity or contestability. Suddenly the game is highly contestable. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The tweaks that we had just after the World Cup, there was probably a real feeling that the game might get a bit more fluent as a result and present more continuity but it hasn’t I guess, it has created more contestability. Clearly, that is an area where they are going to have to spend most of their time in order to get the balance right.”

Attack play that entertained supporters used to be all the rage in professional rugby, Mitchell recalling a time when it was written into a performance he was given while working in Super Rugby at the turn of the millennium.  

“It’s amazing. I remember when I was first contracted for Super Rugby almost 20 years ago, one part of my performance review was around the style of football. The arrival of Super Rugby was very much on the premise of creating the most attacking football in the world. 

“I’m not sure whether we will get back to those days of exceptional or extraordinary scores, I don’t think that is good for the game either. But if we just create some simplicity around the breakdown then we can really move forward. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“The game is still good at the moment. It’s like anything in life, you will have right and left wing thinking so it really depends where you sit, but having been in the game for a while and having also coached attack you sort of understand where we have got to get the balance right.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 16 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search