Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Video: Wasps fuming over red card for Brookes

(Photo by Malcolm Couzens/Getty Images)

Defence coach Ian Costello has questioned whether alleged foul play from Kieran Brookes merited the early second-half red card which resulted in Wasps versus Leicester becoming the second 14-on-14 round ten match in this weekend’s Gallagher Premiership. 

ADVERTISEMENT

A player from each side was red-carded for headshots with the shoulder when Bath narrowly defeated Gloucester in the Premiership on Friday night and two more players saw red when Wasps visited Leicester the following day. 

Leicester’s Jasper Wiese was red-carded for the 27th-minute incident where his shoulder made contact with the head of Ben Morris. However, rather than make use of their one-man advantage, Wasps suffered their own red card when Brookes clashed with Tomas Lavanini in the 42nd minute. 

Video Spacer

Who were the best players in round two of the Six Nations?

Video Spacer

Who were the best players in round two of the Six Nations?

Interviewed some minutes later on BT Sport, Costello was unhappy that Wasps has followed Leicester in going down to 14 men. Asked about the contest becoming 14 against 14 he said: “I’m struggling with the second one but I’m biased. 

“I thought the ball carrier was quite low and Brooksy was part of the tackle. I would probably need a look at it from different angles. I am all for looking after players, it just looked pretty harsh from up here but I could be wrong on second viewing. 

“It’s about timing really. There was one earlier where he was a little bit late and he took out the second man. Fair enough. I thought they both arrived together there, but player safety is paramount and good technique. We will have a look at it after and see was it warranted. We just have to deal with it now 14-on-14 and we have been playing poorly.”

Here is how the decision was reached, with the BT Sport commentary of Austin Healey interspersed with the dialogue of the two officials, referee Craig Maxwell-Keys and TMO Claire Hodnett…

ADVERTISEMENT

CMK: Time is off because the player that knocked it on is being treated where they scrum is going to be so we will have plenty of replays. 

AH: That’s the same. It’s a little bit closer, it’s not as evident. He does hit him with the elbow. 

CMK: We’re asking the same question, whether that right arm is attempting to wrap if we have head contact? 

CH: That’s the best angle, Craig, Do you want to see that again?

CMK: So firstly we definitely have got a shoulder that hitting someone on the head. Agree? 

ADVERTISEMENT

CH: Yes, he is not in a position or making a legitimate tackle. 

CMK: I could have some sympathy if I saw that arm coming up at least and it was deflected off the other tackler which prevented him wrapping, but I don’t see that as the issue. He was always tucking his arm, making no attempt to wrap. 

CH: Agreed, Craig. 

CMK: Okay, so let’s assess sanction points. It’s shoulder to the head so always illegal. So mitigation becomes irrelevant. It’s always illegal, shoulder to the head, it’s another red card.  

AH: I think that one is slightly more harsh because it is not his shoulder that hits him, it’s his elbow that hits him.

The match at Mattioli Woods Welford Road Stadium eventually ended with 14 Wasps players playing 13 from Leicester as Tigers back row Hanro Liebenberg was red-carded for taking Josh Bassett out in the air in the 79th minute of a match that the home side won 27-8.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search