Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Immature': Provincial union chairman slams NZRPA boss over latest twist in Silver Lake spat

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

NZRPA boss Rob Nichol’s decision to leak confidential information to media amid the controversial Silver Lake saga has been labelled as “immature” by a provincial chairman.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nichol leaked a memo sent to media on Friday which outlined an alternative proposal to the controversial Silver Lake deal, which, should it get the green light, is set to inject a much-needed $387.5 million into the national union’s coffers.

In return, Silver Lake, the American private equity firm, would have 12.5 percent stake in NZR, a concept Nichol and the NZRPA are staunchly opposed to.

Video Spacer

The Spirit of Rugby | Episode 1 | RugbyPass

Video Spacer

The Spirit of Rugby | Episode 1 | RugbyPass

In the memo sent to media, Nichol revealed Auckland-based investment manager company Forsyth Barr has tabled an offer which would see NZR sell a five percent stake in its revenue-generating assets via an NZX-listed entity to the Kiwi public and institutions.

The decision to leak the proposal, which contained confidential information, to media before running it past NZR sparked a sensational response from the national union’s chief executive Mark Robinson, who said his organisation’s relationship with the NZRPA is now “at a new low”.

Northland Rugby chairman Andrew Ritchie was similarly incensed by Nichol’s actions, which he slammed as “immature” and “not in good faith”.

“I think it’s immature, and clearly a play,’’ the Northland boss told Stuff. “I don’t think it’s in the spirit of things. And it’s not in good faith.

“Maybe they are being naive, I don’t know. But it is a very, very disappointing thing that they are coming out with these things.’’

Northand, along with New Zealand’s 25 other provincial unions and the Maori Rugby Board, unanimously voted in favour of the Silver Lake deal, which is hoped to financially revitalise the country’s domestic game, last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the NZRPA refused to sign off on the deal due to concerns regarding foreign ownership of the national union, which has brought the deal to a standstill.

Ritchie made it clear how important the Silver Lake deal would be to the amateur level of the game in New Zealand, something of which he want the NZRPA to understand.

“If the deal came through from Silver Lake it would be an absolute game changer for the grassroots game,’’ he said.

“And that is what we are thinking of. It is not just about the money. It is the sophistication that they [Silver Lake] bring and the development that comes with it.’’

Richie added he, and other provincial unions around the country, struggle to see why the NZRPA are so opposed to the deal and are disappointed by the public feud between them and NZR as a result.

“It has been a well thought-out plan and not just something that has been plucked out of the sky. I think we are all struggling to see where the Players’ Association are coming from. It’s disappointing to say the least.’’

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search