Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

In defence of Eddie Jones' call to change the ruck laws

England captain Dylan Hartley talking to referee Romain Poite

Yes, Italy should be praised for their smart anti-ruck tactic. But now World Rugby needs to change the game’s laws so they can never do it again, writes James Harrington.

ADVERTISEMENT

The laughter that followed England’s struggle to counter Italy’s ‘fox’ anti-ruck policy in the third round of the 2017 Six Nations was soon drowned out by anger and disbelief as Eddie Jones suggested the laws should be changed.

Critics pointed out that Italy broke none of rugby’s laws – which they didn’t. Their tactic was both smart and legal. Jones the Fox was outfoxed for once, they said – which he was, for 40 minutes at least. Conor O’Shea deserves all the praise in the world for daring to be different. Jones should put up and shut up, they insisted. No, he shouldn’t.

Many have also argued that the England players should have been more aware of the laws of the game they play, quicker to react to Italian tactics, and generally more streetwise about the whole thing. There is no doubt that those wearing white shirts at Twickenham on that day were culpable of what could be termed, in this jargon-packed world, as Sensible Reaction Inertia.

But, make no mistake, what Italy did against England has never been done before. Yes, the no-ruck-no-offside ploy is well known, and a rugby smartarse near you will no doubt be listing all the times it has been used: David Pocock did it against Ireland, they’ll say; as did the Chiefs; it’s been around the sevens circuit since 2012; Wasps also used it against Toulouse in the European Champions Cup … then, in an aside, they may even argue that fact alone really means that James Haskell and Nathan Hughes should have recognised it much earlier.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1485479950″]

Tell them to stop. Maybe even remind them that they were screaming ‘OFFSIDE!’ at the TV like almost everyone else before an even bigger smartarse pointed out the sheer cunning of ‘The Fox’. The tactic has been used before, but no side before Italy had employed it so intensively, so often, and so brazenly. Pocock did it once, Chiefs used it sporadically, and usually at restarts, and Wasps’ Hughes was as surprised as anyone when he tried it against Toulouse.

Italy, on the other hand, did it time and time and time again. For more than half the match. That’s an extreme use of a loophole – and that alone is why World Rugby should seriously consider changing the relevant law.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is a precedent for this.

The kick to touch has been an accepted and standard tactic since forever. But, in 1963, Welsh scrum-half Clive Rowlands belted the ball out of play so often that there were more than 100 lineouts in an otherwise unmemorable Five Nations encounter between Scotland and Wales at Murrayfield.

At the time, kicks could go out on the full from anywhere on the pitch, and the lineout would be taken from the point the ball crossed the touchline. But, following that match, the law was reviewed and – eventually (rugby’s powers that be always were a conservative bunch) – modified to the one known and accepted today, in which players can only kick a ball out on the full if they are inside their own 22, otherwise the lineout will be taken in line with the point from which the ball was kicked.

Even that law has been modified to stop teams taking the ball into their own 22 before passing it to the player with the biggest howitzer boot … But that’s by-the-by.

The point is the Welsh hoof-and-hoof again ploy in that one game in 1963, though entirely within the laws of rugby, was so extreme and affected play to such an extent that it prompted a change in rugby’s laws.

ADVERTISEMENT

The same is true of Italy’s anti-ruck tactics at Twickenham in 2017. Conor O’Shea and Brendan Venter should be applauded for their smarts – and for giving England a tactical shoeing for the better part of an hour. Then the law should be changed so it cannot be repeated.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BeamMeUp 1 hour ago
The Springboks have something you don't have

A few comments. Firstly, I am a Bok fan and it's been a golden period for us. I hope my fellow Bok fans appreciate this time and know that it cannot last forever, so soak it all in!


The other thing to mention (and this is targeted at Welsh, English and even Aussie supporters who might be feeling somewhat dejected) is that it's easy to forget that just before Rassie Erasmus took over in 2018, the Boks were ranked 7th in the world and I had given up hope we'd ever be world beaters again.


Sport is a fickle thing and Rassie and his team have managed to get right whatever little things it takes to make a mediocre team great. I initially worried his methods might be short-lived (how many times can you raise a person's commitment by talking about his family and his love of his country as a motivator), but he seems to have found a way. After winning in 2019 on what was a very simple game plan, he has taken things up ever year - amazing work which has to be applauded! (Dankie Rassie! Ons wardeer wat jy vir die ondersteuners en die land doen!) (Google translate if you don't understand Afrikaans! 😁)


I don't think people outside South Africa fully comprehend the enormity of the impact seeing black and white, English, Afrikaans and Xhosa and all the other hues playing together does for the country's sense of unity. It's pure joy and happiness.


This autumn tour has been a bit frustrating in that the Boks have won, but never all that convincingly. On the one hand, I'd like to have seen more decisive victories, BUT what Rassie has done is expose a huge number of players to test rugby, whilst also diversifying the way the Boks play (Tony Brown's influence).


This change of both style and personnel has resulted in a lack of cohesion at times and we've lost some of the control, whereas had we been playing our more traditional style, that wouldn't happen. This is partially attributable to the fact that you cannot play Tony Brown's expansive game whilst also having 3 players available at every contact point to clear the defence off the ball. I have enjoyed seeing the Boks play a more exciting, less attritional game, which is a boring, albeit effective spectacle. So, I am happy to be patient, because the end justifies the means (and I trust Rassie!). Hopefully all these players we are blooding will give us incredible options for substitutions come next year's Rugby Championship and of course, the big prize in 2027.


Last point! The game of rugby has never been as exciting as it is now. Any of Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Argentina, Scotland, England & Australia can beat one another. South Africa may be ranked #1, but I wouldn't bet my house in them beating France or New Zealand, and we saw Argentina beating both South Africa and New Zealand this year! That's wonderful for the game and makes the victories we do get all the sweeter. Each win is 100% earned. Long may it last!


Sorry for the long post! 🏉🌍

12 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Rassie Erasmus holds the solution to England's Jamie George conundrum Rassie Erasmus holds the solution to England's Jamie George conundrum
Search