Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Inaugural World Club Cup on course for 2028 launch

By PA
Johnny McNicholl of the Crusaders, Garry Ringrose and Robbie Henshaw of Leinster (Photos By Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images and Joe Allison/Getty Images)

Rugby union’s inaugural World Club Cup is on course to launch in 2028 as talks over the new competition reach an advanced stage.

ADVERTISEMENT

All five leagues involved in the four-week tournament that will be hosted in the northern hemisphere in June are in support of the concept being driven by European Professional Club Rugby, the PA news agency understands.

While an agreement has yet to be finalised, the format of the WCC is taking shape with eight European sides, six from Super Rugby and two teams from Japan to be involved.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Qualification is meritocratic only with the top eight seeds from the group stage of the Investec Champions Cup given the chance to compete, even if some nations are unrepresented as a result.

The competition will run every four years, meaning there will not be a European champion for that year, although a more competitive Challenge Cup will take place for those not involved in the WCC.

Crucially, the Gallagher Premiership, Top 14 and United Rugby Championship are open to playing their finals in May in order to accommodate the new tournament in June.

Reaching this point in the planning process is a significant achievement for EPCR chairman Dominic McKay and chief executive Jacques Raynaud given the concept of matching the best club sides from Europe and the southern hemisphere has been mooted for years without any progress being made.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is understood that the prospect of a strong commercial return for all stakeholders from the WCC has been key to the momentum behind establishing it in 2028.

EPCR is also aiming to launch a women’s version of the Champions Cup in 2026 with talks between the relevant leagues and unions to be held in June.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

13 Comments
A
AllyOz 46 days ago

The timing isn't great for the Super Rugby teams - it might mean pushing the competition earlier and we are already starting in summer (February) which can regularly have temps in the 30s (and still in the high 20s at night).


But I think it would actually bring something to SR. If the top teams prove to be competitive at this level and if we get a decent share of any revenue, then it could help bolster the SR competition and give it some additional meaning. And it might draw in the sort of private investors that Europe have. We have a very small market - about 30-32 million population across the Pacific countries that participate. It would be good to be part of something larger that brought more eyeballs from outside. And, if a team like the Reds or the Crusaders or the Drua are competitive, it could get NH fans watching the regular SR competition - buying subscriptions etc.


So, while it won't be easy for us to be involved, it could be beneficial longer term. It is probably better than expanding SR and taking on all the burden of regular travel to places like SA or Japan or S. America, which was part of what brought us undone before.


What might work even better would possible to add some expansion in the region, play SR AU and SR NZ again (with some added Pacific teams) and have the Top 4 from NZ and the Top 2 from the Australian conference included based on recent results.

J
JH 256 days ago

When the Blues went north to play the European champions in the late 90s and thumped them, the NH has never wanted a bar of a world club championship.


Now years later the NH and now Japanese clubs having strip-mined SH Super sides of as many players and coaches as they can get their hands on for their own teams, it suddenly seems like a great idea to them.


They just had to wait for the Crusaders to finally slip.

J
JD Kiwi 256 days ago

I'd have much preferred this in year three of the World Cup cycle. Playing in Europe, just after the world cup exodus, seems like a pretty tall order.

S
Shaylen 256 days ago

Six Super Rugby Teams? Really? Just the top 8 from the champions cup? are you kidding me?

S
SB 257 days ago

Far too many super rugby teams for this competition, sorry to say it but with the quality of Super Rugby these days, how did they swing this? There are 16 positions and 5 comps, rather make it 3 from each competition and one invitational side from the Argies (bring back the Jaguares).


However still not intrigued to watch it…

A
AllyOz 46 days ago

I am from the SH but I feel you're right.

M
MakeOllieMathisAnAB 257 days ago

Holds no interest for me. I don’t want All Blacks getting burnout with an extra competition.

I hope the NZ teams send extended squads of young players who need the experience.

P
Phillip 257 days ago

Initially, I thought it would be a great idea! However, on reflection, I don’t know what benefits a Super Rugby team ( I loath them being referred to as clubs) or a club from Japan would take away from this. Teams from Australia and New Zealand don’t even mix with our friends in Japan on a regular basis as it is, beside maybe a preseason trip or two. Maybe, a regional tournament model that would result in the winners playing each other for a World Club trophy instead? I don’t know, but I’m struggling to see the value in it when the goal for any one playing at that level isn’t to match up against a club from half way around the world, but to push for selection in a national team to represent their country. Just my 2 cents.

f
fl 257 days ago

I don’t like this.


There are enough rugby competitions. Creating more will just devalue what we already have.

H
Head high tackle 257 days ago

So dont watch. I love it and Im already looking forward to the Chiefs being crowned the first world club champions.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 16 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search