Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ireland player ratings vs France - Six Nations Super Saturday

(Photo by Franck Fife/AFP via Getty Images)

Ireland headed into this Six Nations Super Saturday on top of the table but while all the talk in advance was how they would need the bonus-point win to guarantee them the title, England’s struggle in their 34-5 victory over Italy instead meant a win by just seven points or more would ultimately suffice (six if they scored one try). 

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite this simplification of the mathematics, which would have been even simpler had Ireland not conceded a converted try in the last play the previous weekend in Dublin versus the Italians, winning in Paris was still a tall order when viewed from the prism that Andy Farrell’s side had been dismantled in their last away match at Twickenham. 

However, much can change in eight pandemic months and with this Irish XV altered in a number of areas and benefiting from their round four tune-up, momentum was with them heading into this 2020 decider, especially given the level of optimism that their back row lethargy had potentially been solved by finding CJ Stander two robust rookies to pack down with. 

Video Spacer

Ireland boss Andy Farrell sets the scene ahead the match in Paris

Video Spacer

Ireland boss Andy Farrell sets the scene ahead the match in Paris

That hope, though, was ultimately trick rather than treat as Ireland miserably failed to build on the promising first half that had ended with them just 17-13 in arrears. The gap should have been a solitary point but skipper Johnny Sexton made the cardinal cup final rugby error of spurning easy three points by instead kicking to the corner and rolling the dice. 

When the opportunity failed to translate into a try, a massive psychological blow had been struck and what unfolded in the second half was a contest that became a best-forgotten Irish nightmare. 

The final result showed that the gap on the scoreboard was only eight points, France winning 35-27, but there was effectively a chasm between the teams for large parts of the second period. Come the finish the only team celebrating were 1,100 kilometres away from Paris as England had been handed their third title in five years under Eddie Jones while sat in their Roman hotel. 

It left an error-srewn Ireland reflecting on what if, having only themselves to blame after their misfiring second-half was encapsulated by Sexton’s unnecessary show of angry at being withdrawn eleven minutes from the finish. Here’s how the veteran captain and his Irish teammates rated on an evening that doesn’t reflect well on new boss Farrell: 

ADVERTISEMENT

15. JACOB STOCKDALE – 4

His recent switch to full-back put emphasis on his defence and he was found wanting. Had gotten away with a fumble just minutes before he was woundingly involved in the first-half penalty try that resulted in Caelan Doris getting carded. Why he didn’t fall on the ball is a question that will Halloween-like haunt him? His second-half also had errors, three points given away at a 50th-minute penalty, and he was then too slow to cut out a try-creating Romain Ntamack kick through. His metres carried ended in excess of 100 and he finished with a try, but those things were consolations on a very poor night. 

14. ANDREW CONWAY – 5

Similar to last week, traffic was restricted in his area of the pitch. Had no ball at all in the first half, but did have a few tackles to make. Crucially pipped to the catch that Anthony Bouthier made which instigated the counter that pushed France 22-13 ahead early on the resumption. Not his fault Ireland were shown up.  

13. ROBBIE HENSHAW – 6

A starter in place of the broken-jawed Garry Ringrose, the only change to the Ireland XV had his hands full on paper with Virimi Vakatawa and co coming down his channel. A busy first-half on the tackling front was followed by dogged fire-fighting in the second where he showed immense pluck to produce a solo try on the hour. Without that, Ireland could have been hosed like used happen in the bad old days in Paris.

12. BUNDEE AKI – 5 

With Ireland needing physicality in the carry, he took it upon himself to seek out bruising contact in the opening period. However, he didn’t turn up in the second half. His unwise kick resulted in the game-changing early France try and he was hooked on 53 minutes for Chris Farrell who didn’t have the brightest of starts with a possession-losing miscommunication with Stockdale. 

ADVERTISEMENT

11. HUGO KEENAN – 6

Very nearly had a try off Sexton’s splendid grubber on then minutes, the incident which resulted in Bouthier’s yellow card for deliberately batting the ball into touch. Was constantly brave in the air contesting ball and didn’t drop his head, providing the assist out of the tackle for Stockdale’s late try. 

10. JOHNNY SEXTON – 5

Started excellently, his grubber nearly creating a try for Keenan while his carry in getting held up over line helped build the pressure that led to Cian Healy’s try. However, instead of going on to lead his side to glory, he neglected the maxim of kicking your points in cup final rugby. Shocking call to go for the corner at the end of the first half instead of the posts. Was then left chasing Ntamack’s shadow throughout a terrible second half where at one stage he even failed to find touch with a penalty. His show of pique when substituted wasn’t the action of a team man.  

9. CONOR MURRAY – 5

Began with a good attempted penalty kick from inside his own half and from there he kept Ireland’s tempo high during a promising first-half where his only individual regret was getting penalised at the ruck that saw France go 17-13 ahead. Struggled in the second half behind a pack that didn’t know what had hit it during the opening 15 minutes and he was hooked for Jamison Gibson-Park on 65 minutes. 

1. CIAN HEALY – 6

A night where he became Ireland’s sixth Test rugby centurion, his 100th appearance, unfortunately, wasn’t a winning one despite an at times warrior-like contribution. His gutsy try catapulted Ireland level at 7-7 and he was to go on and encouragingly return from a first-half head injury assessment. However, that was as good as it got. 

2. ROB HERRING – 4

Had shown glimpses against the Italians that he might have what it takes to be Rory Best’s long-term successor but this was a couple of steps backwards. His lineout throwing had messy moments while his presence at the breakdown wasn’t the influence it was seven days earlier. Hooked on 58 minutes for Dave Heffernan whose throwing accuracy was problematic. 

3. ANDREW PORTER – 5

Enjoyed an early penalty win at the scrum, but far too easily stepped on halfway by Gael Fickou who set up the opening try. Improved after that and helped manoeuvre Ireland into a decent position by the interval but was left with too many second-half fires to fight before leaving Finlay Bealham saw the last eleven minutes of the game out. 

4. TADHG BEIRNE – 6

Exhibited smart play in some of his first-half carrying which helped inflate Irish optimism that winning was mission possible. Continued to battle hard against the second-half tide and lasted 62 minutes before Ultan Dillane was introduced. 

5. JAMES  RYAN – 6

A far better showing than what he produced last weekend against the Italians. Latched on to drive Healy over for his try while so much of his in-tight first-half play was what you wanted from him. Kept trying despite the second-half momentum shift and finished his team’s busiest tackler with a double-digit figure. 

6. CAELAN DORIS – 5

Will replay his yellow card incident over and over in his head, inexperience tempting him into the foul on Gregory Alldritt that resulted in the first-half penalty try and his sin-binning. His return just before the break to make it 15 vs 15 again was the reason why Sexton went for the corner instead of the posts. Will learn so much from how the difficult second half unfolded. 

7. WILL CONNORS – 5

Star player on his man of the match debut against the Italians, this was a very different outing and he wasn’t the influence Ireland needed him to be. Paid the price for his team’s early second-half slump, Peter O’Mahony brought on 14 minutes into it.  

8. CJ STANDER – 5

His ball-carrying was much curtailed in the opening half, interval stats counting just five paltry metres off nine runs. With the second-half pressure on, it was his in-from-the-side penalty that put France 25-13 ahead. Won two breakdown penalties in riposte in the closing stages but by then the game was long gone from him and from his dazed team.  

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 25 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search