Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ireland player ratings vs New Zealand | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

By Ian Cameron at Aviva Stadium, Dublin
Garry Ringrose of Ireland is tackled by Jordie Barrett of New Zealand during the Autumn Nations Series match between Ireland and New Zealand at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Seb Daly/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Ireland player ratings: Andy Farrell’s Ireland were blown off the park by referee Nic Berry in what was a scrappy and error-strewn display in their Autumn Nations Series opener against bitter rivals New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pre-match chat was about the increasingly acrimonious relations between these two teams but it was very much the All Blacks having the last laugh here.

Ireland deserved to lose this one, even if they didn’t get the rub of the green on the hallowed Aviva turf.

Video Spacer

The 20-min red card explained by referee Karl Dickson

Referee Karl Dickson explains the 20-min red card system that is in place during the Autumn Nations Series.

Video Spacer

The 20-min red card explained by referee Karl Dickson

Referee Karl Dickson explains the 20-min red card system that is in place during the Autumn Nations Series.

Here’s how we rated the Irish players:

1. Andrew Porter – 8
Porter was immense. Started the game with a superb charge down on Ratima and was after that his usual tireless self in the scrum and breakdown, showing immense strength against a powerful New Zealand front row, even if Nic Berry didn’t always reward his dominance.

2. Ronan Kelleher – 5
Back from injury, Kelleher was strangely pinged for contesting the ball in a 9th-minute ruck, an infringement that saw New Zealand get their first points of the game. Ireland’s win percentage at the lineout was also sub-par, but he wasn’t totally to blame for that.

3. Finlay Bealham – 7
Deserves a lot of credit here, as there were real fears around his scrummaging coming into this one in place of the injured Tadhg Furlong. For the most part, held his own at the setpiece and worked hard in open play. Showed grit.

4. Joe McCarthy – 8.5
Another player thrown in the deep end after his injury lay-0ff, McCarthy was relentless in defence and carried well when called upon. Got into the All Blacks gladiator style, which Paul Mescal seemed to love from his vantage point in the stand [see what we’ve done there?] Maybe his best performance in an Ireland jersey.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ireland player ratings
Actor Paul Mescal looks on during the Autumn Nations Series match between Ireland and New Zealand at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

5. James Ryan – 6
The energy and commitment was there with the 6’8 lock leading Ireland’s tackling stats for most of the match. Played with visible intensity, but began to wilt under the huge defensive workload that was being asked of the men in green.

6. Tadhg Beirne – 5
Worked tirelessly in the trenches, bringing his usual grit and work rate to a physical contest. His trademark turnovers or game-changing moments weren’t on show here though and he ended up in the negative on that front.

7. Josh van der Flier – 8.5
Van der Flier was sharp as a tack around the fringes, tackling like a demented wolverine high on Class-A narcotics and generally making life difficult for the Kiwis. Did brilliantly to squeeze over in the 43rd minute when Ireland desperately needed it.

ADVERTISEMENT
Fixture
Internationals
Ireland
13 - 23
Full-time
New Zealand
All Stats and Data

8. Caelan Doris – 7.5
Doris carried like a 6.6-litre Duramax and added huge value in defence with some particularly pitiless tackling. Instrumental in Ireland’s physical approach, but there was only so much he could do against wave after wave of black attack.

9. Jamison Gibson-Park – 6.5
Showed flashes of his usual pace and creativity but was a bit loose in execution, leading to some bungled opportunities. The All Blacks got to him at times, but he stayed in the fight.

10. Jack Crowley – 4
Struggled to make an impact in the first half, remaining largely anonymous. Grew into the game slightly in the second forty but couldn’t quite find his usual rhythm or influence. Reliable with the boot, but needs to work on his stage presence and his handling.

11. James Lowe – 5.5
Tried to make things happen but wasn’t given a stage tonight by his native New Zealanders. Managed some decent clearances but the All Blacks were eating up Ireland’s kicking game. If he was judged on his 72nd-minute kick alone it would have been a 10 out of 10 performance.

Possession

Team Logo
8%
36%
31%
25%
Team Logo
8%
36%
42%
14%
Team Logo
Team Logo
67%
Possession Last 10 min
33%
41%
Possession
59%

12. Bundee Aki – 3
A totally off-colour performance from Aki. Opened his account with a poorly timed pass which went to the deck before inexplicably spilling a ball a few minutes later. One good run aside, the All Blacks had his number in attack, where he struggled to make a meaningful impact.

13. Garry Ringrose – 6
Reliable and composed, even if he spent most of his evening scrambling in defence, including a thunderous hit on Ireland’s arch-nemesis Rieko Ioane. Didn’t get the chance to do much on the other side of the ball. Took a nasty headshot on 39 minutes from soon-to-be Leinster teammate Jordie Barrett, which resulted in Barrett’s binning.

14. Mack Hansen – 5
Showed flashes of his creativity with ball in hand and had a couple of threatening runs. Worked hard defensively but not as involved as he’d have liked.

15. Hugo Keenan – 6.5
A calm presence at the back, Keenan was safe under the high ball and covered the ground well. Consistently there to support his teammates but like most of his comrades didn’t get a look in offensively.

REPLACEMENTS

16. Rob Herring – 5
Herring brought fresh energy and physicality but couldn’t make a significant impact.

17. Cian Healy – 6
Scrummaged well when introduced. Didn’t get many chances to make a mark in open play.

18. Tom O’Toole – NA
Came on but HIA’ed after just two minutes.

19. Iain Henderson – 1
A 62nd-minute knock-on from Henderson was not the type of impact Ireland were looking for from the Ulsterman, nor was a penalty conceded that extended New Zealand’s lead minutes later. A dire cameo.

20. Peter O’Mahony – 6
Added valuable experience and grit in the closing stages, but Ireland were more or less cooked at that stage.

21. Conor Murray – NA
Not on long enough to rate.

22. Ciaran Frawley – 5
Ireland seemed to wake from their slumber when Frawley came on, at least with ball-in-hand. One spill in particular aside, he was an improvement on Crowley.

23. Jamie Osborne – 5
Came on late and saw limited action.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

40 Comments
K
Kevin Volf 43 days ago

That Frawley Crowley comparison is poor. Ireland had scored all their points, and were winning, when Frawley came on. They didnt need to 'wake up from their slumber', they needed to press their advantage.

W
Willie 44 days ago

These ratings are partially useful if you did not watch the game. They are even less useful if both teams are assessed by different people. Surely if one of these analysts watches one team, they can be expected to watch the other.

B
Bull Shark 44 days ago

I thought berry had a shocker. Irish may be feeling hard done by.

P
POHM 39 days ago

What, for being allowed to come in from the side ruck time with impunity, and being allowed to lay on the wrong side of the ruck continually, with berry saying " they're trying to roll away" lets face it, any other ref and Ireland would have had several in the bin for repeat offences.

D
Docant 43 days ago

Nick Berry is not an international class ref.He should be replaced by someone more competent.

B
BM 44 days ago

Most of the inflated ratings given Ireland today as a 10-point loser just show that NH are not adjusting ratings to reflect it.....dream on NH raters!!!😇YOU need to adjust ratings for losers to be fairer in a contest especially when winners are not given the same chance to higher ones 'cos they mjght have deserved it!

C
Craig S 44 days ago

Ian after reading your ratings I have to wonder if we watched the same game! JGP was everywhere today and was outstanding. James Lowe put in his usual top effort against his fellow countrymen. the 6.5 and 5.5 you gave them is unfair and TBH simply unbelievable.

B
BH 44 days ago

Way too generous for the Irish tight 5. They were owned in every department and were lucky not to be penalised more as they were very ill-disciplined. Their scrum and lineout got cooked.


"Kelleher was strangely pinged for contesting the ball in a 9th-minute ruck" - yet he never released the ball in the tackle.

A
Andrew Nichols 44 days ago

showing immense strength against a powerful New Zealand front row, even if Nic Berry didn’t always reward his dominance.


What dominance? He played well but the packs were equal bar one where the TH had to come back on and got owned by Tuungafasi...and that scrum out from their line where their dissarray was inexplicably rewarded with a reset.

J
JWH 44 days ago

Yeah I think it's safe to say that Ireland forward pack got owned.


Lomax had that LH number that whole game, and Tamaiti only got tricked once due to an experience gap.


The Irish lineout was also abysmal, losing ball whenever they needed it.

B
BB 44 days ago

JGP 7.5 at least for me.

J
JH 44 days ago

Comedy ratings!!

S
SadersMan 44 days ago

The Irish-Kiwis were a mixed bunch today. Bundee looked tired as. How the heck does James Lowe do that 50/22 thing from no angle? JGP was great, I thought.

B
B 44 days ago

URC:Leinster, Munster, Ulster, Connach vs SRPacific:Blues, Chiefs, Hurricanes, Crusaders.

Cheers SRPacific referee Nic Berry...

C
Chiefs Mana 44 days ago

Is that’s the best of the much vaunted URC, I’ll take super rugby thanks

T
TI 44 days ago

Ah yes, the obligatory ref whine. That's why, for sure...

J
JH 44 days ago

Ireland got away with murder at the rucks and breakdown.

O
Oh no, not him again? 44 days ago

Rusty vs battle hardened. The joys of the rugby calendar.

P
POHM 39 days ago

Funny these excuse's are always used by NH bloggers when they lose, whether it be down south or up north.

M
MakeOllieMathisAnAB 44 days ago

Good advertisement for why we need a global calendar. Ireland played as though it was their first game since July.

N
Ninjin 44 days ago

That is what happens when you only have maybe 10 world class players, a few imports and the rest are club level. Not Ireland's best game but they did seem rusty. Good on the All Blacks!

B
Bull Shark 44 days ago

Vulnerable at 10. Neither Irish 10 looked good.


I thought Irelands defence looked good.


Well done ABs. That wasn’t a pretty win, but you beat Ireland at home. Kudos.

J
JWH 44 days ago

Forwards rated way to highly after being dominated the whole game

J
JWH 44 days ago

Alright, had some time to dig through the stats a bit.


Ireland won 6/10 scrums (60%) and were 7/10 at the lineout (70%). Ireland made 151 tackles and missed 30 (83%).


New Zealand were 8/10 at scrums (80%) and were 8/9 at the lineout (89%). New Zealand made 100 tackles and missed 14 (88%).


NZ made 9 linebreaks, Ireland made 1. New Zealand made 317 post contact m (2.69 per carry), Ireland made 177m (2.06 per carry).


Ireland conceded 13 penalties to New Zealands 5.


Shows NZ's complete domination at setpiece, and were better during general play. That entire Irish front row deserve <4, and the locks deserve <4.5 for that misery at the lineout. Doris a 7.5 for doing what? Beirne also deserves less than 4. What is the point in playing 3 locks if you can't even win the lineouts.


Just abysmal today from that Irish forward pack. The author might have to be less merciful with this Irish team if he wants to keep his reputation alive.


'Added valuable experience and grit in the closing stages, but Ireland were more or less cooked at that stage.' - Ian Cameron


Just found this gem of a one-liner too. Anymore insight you'd like to add, Ian?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 21 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search