Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Irish RFU hails ‘important milestone’ with news of gender balance endorsement

By PA
Ireland Women's team are rooted at the foot of the Six Nations table with accusations of a lack of support levelled at the IRFU (Photo By Roberto Bregani/Getty Images)

A proposal to achieve 40 per cent female representation on the Irish Rugby Football Union committee has been endorsed at the governing body’s annual council meeting.

ADVERTISEMENT

The council has agreed the necessary amendments to IRFU laws to enable the target to be achieved by the end of the year.

IRFU chief executive Kevin Potts hailed the news as an “important milestone in our history”.

“The IRFU is committed to meeting the 40 per cent gender balance target by the end of this year and today’s decision by council will allow us achieve this,” he said in a statement.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We have engaged and consulted with our stakeholders on the changes required and I welcome council’s unanimous support.

“This is an important milestone in our history and one which will pave the way for greater diversity and inclusion in Irish Rugby.”

Meanwhile, Greg Barrett has been elected the 134th president of the IRFU.

Cork-born Barrett, who has been a Munster delegate on the IRFU committee since 2013, replaces John Robinson in the role.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 5 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 18 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules Stephen Donald weighs in on All Blacks eligibility ruling
Search