Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Not a great team’: Irish scribe on All Blacks’ ‘lucky’ win over England

Ardie Savea of New Zealand looks on during the Autumn Nations Series 2025 match between England and New Zealand All Blacks at Allianz Stadium on November 2, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

Irish rugby writer Gerry Thornley didn’t mince words when assessing the All Blacks ahead of this week’s Test at Dublin’s Aviva Stadium. Thornley believes that New Zealand are “not a great team” and that they were “lucky” to beat England at Allianz Stadium on Saturday evening.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following the All Blacks’ 64-19 demolition of Eddie Jones’ Japan in Yokohama, coach Scott Robertson turned to a more familiar lineup for the clash with England. Ardie Savea, Beauden Barrett, Jordie Barrett, Rieko Ioane and Will Jordan were among those who returned.

But, this was always going to be a tough Test for the visitors, with some considering England the favourites going into the highly anticipated clash. Mark Tele’a scored the first try of the match in the eighth minute, but the boot of Marcus Smith kept the scores close.

England led 22-14 with 15 minutes left to play, but Damian McKenzie and Tele’a helped New Zealand claw their way back. McKenzie slotted a clutch sidelined conversion with four minutes to play to give them a 24-22 lead, with England missing late chances to steal the win.

Coach Robertson and assistant Jason Ryan were seen celebrating wildly as the All Blacks hung on for an important win on their Northern Tour. But it doesn’t get any easier for them with the Irish up next, but as Thornley explained, that result sets the stage for the Dublin Test.

“The All Blacks for me, they’re not a great team at the moment. They’re a little bit lucky to escape with a win at the weekend. I’m glad they did win because I think it sets up this game better than if they’d lost to England at Twickenham,” Thornley said on SENZ Breakfast.

“What it showed me was in the way they conjured tries almost from nothing like (Wallace) Sititi’s offload for (Mark) Tele’a’s first try, Beauden Barrett working that switch with Will Jordan, Tele’a’s finish in the corner at the end.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But more than anything, if I could extract one moment from that game is when the ball is behind them and they’re running back into their own half and Wallace Sititi picks the ball up leaves an English player for dead and accelerates away and gets that offload away… that just sums up the threat the All Blacks have. They still have an ability to conjure tries out of nothing.

“They’re the team with the most flair, the most X-factor. Will Jordan is an absolute game-breaker… pity Beauden Barrett’s not playing because I love watching Beauden Barrett play, greatness in our midst, you don’t want to miss out on chances to see him play.”

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
2
Draws
0
Wins
3
Average Points scored
22
25
First try wins
60%
Home team wins
20%

With Barrett out of the picture, it seems more likely than not that coach Robertson will turn to a familiar face to steer the All Blacks’ ship as the team’s chief playmaker. McKenzie seems like the front-runner to line up in the 10 jersey after dropping back to the bench for the England Test.

McKenzie, 29, started New Zealand’s first eight Tests of the year in the No. 10 jumper before being relegated to the bench for Bledisloe II in Wellington. The playmaker returned to the starting side against the Brave Blossoms but received mixed reviews after that performance.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Stephen Perofeta is another potential candidate to start at first five-eighth but would be considered an outside chance. The same can be said for Super Rugby Pacific champion Harry Plummer who was called back into the squad after Barrett was ruled out.

“I’d love to know what you guys think of Damian McKenzie,” Thornley added.

“It seems to me from this side of the world that Scott Robertson invested a huge amount of faith in him and then abandoned him.

“Then he comes out and saves the All Blacks in the weekend in the last quarter. Now, how’s he feeling when he starts again?”

Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for the latest episode of Walk the Talk to discuss his move to the NFL. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

110 Comments
J
JWH 41 days ago

I mean from SA, Australia, and England you nonce

R
RedWarrior 42 days ago

Many NZ supporters are arrogant and stupid. We know this?

J
JWH 43 days ago

I think a lot of other supporters find it pretty funny 🤣

R
RedWarrior 43 days ago

Ioane is disrespecting Ireland again and making NZ look bad. NZ stand alone in condoning the mocking of beaten opponents. Good team: horrible attitude.

S
SadersMan 45 days ago

Let it go mate. Looking forward to an epic clash in T minus 3hrs & 13mins.

T
Toaster 46 days ago

Absolutely correct

As an ABs fan it is not a great ABs team

Losing to Argentina again and at home was the worst defeat so far to them

Fading away twice to SA was again another poor return having controlled both game for the first 3/4

Yes it was lucky win against England where they had the only two last chances to win the game - but at least we won


Plenty of talent but far from the finished article

Mixed leadership where Scooter is struggling somewhat and poor discipline


But I like the talent coming through and I like the creativity so far

Certainly busted England open multiple times but didn’t capitalise


Another step up against Ireland and very much up against it

M
MakeOllieMathisAnAB 46 days ago

As fair an assessment as you’ll find. I think a lot of people comment based on the emotion the article headline is designed to illicit, rather th a the actual quote.

Ireland are being granted too much respect by NZ in this build up.

They are a veey good team and favourites and #1 and blah blah blah but it’s not like the All Blacks don’t have the players to rip them apart as well.

It’s a lot more even than the pundits are suggesting.

t
thewizard 46 days ago

I think the author of the article got it pretty right, it's not a great team, good enough to beat anything the north might have to offer probably but not ready for the Boks just yet.

D
DC000 46 days ago

He not wrong though. SH rugby is shite and getting worse. The days of relying on the ref to win as the inferior team should end sooner than later - and that's the death of SH rugby right there.


You had a good - and very lucky - run. Good luck trying to exist when your supporters are too cheap to even buy match tickets.

N
Nickers 47 days ago

This is a very accurate analysis of where the ABs are at the moment, and how they score points. They don't seem to have a repeatable system to break teams down like SA and Ireland do.


Luck is maybe the wrong word, but the ABs attack seems to be built around individual brilliance - they are trying to engineer opportunities for DMac, Jordan, Sititi, Telea etc... to pull something off. They don't know what that thing will be but they hope that given enough shots on goal that these players are so good that they will pull something out of the bag.


The Barrett/Jordan try is an exception. That was very well worked. They kept going side to side until they got the defensive picture they needed then pulled off the play perfectly.


The upside of this approach is that it's hard to defend against. The downside, which we are seeing in every game, even the 10 try fest against Japan, is very long periods of the game without the ABs scoring any points. They don't seem to be prioritising building pressure and being able to collect points and gradually turn the screw - It's all or nothing on every play with a binary outcome - score a try or a turnover.

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

One Irish commentator correctly points out the following:


-This current NZ team are not a "great" team. They lost to Argentina, SA twice very recently, they almost got beaten by a very rusty England. Everyone in the SH would concur they are not great. Whats the issue?

-NZ left the winning or the losing of the game on Saturday in the hands of England. First of all they allowed England gain a two score lead. Then having taken the lead they gifted England two golden opportunities to win. They were relying on England to miss. It was down to luck. This isn't mensa stuff.


The journalist was correct. Again, pages and pages of glowing tributes from Irish media in last week ignored so that one or two lines can bait a load of Kiwis brittle egos. It's just a journalist guys, less of the 'crybaby' stuff as ye would say, its getting close to rugby time.


Author relying on brittle Kiwi ego here and you have not let him down!

j
johnz 47 days ago

I wonder if the English should stop celebrating tackles during the middle of the match, like they'd just won the WC. It's better to leave that stuff until the job is done.

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

The English shake hands when the match is over and show respect. NZ could learn a lesson or two instead of being self righteous all the time.

E
Ed the Duck 47 days ago

Foaming uncontrollably at the mouth, clearly another case of ‘sextonitis’…!!!

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

Not sure of the standard of healthcare you NZers have but I would check Rieko for rabies if he is foaming at the mouth.

j
johnz 47 days ago

Well luckily nobody is claiming this is a great All Blacks team yet, but it is a new team with the makings of a very good one. Compare this to Fozzie's 1st year, and you'd have to say this group is well positioned to at least try and become great. But in the end, greatness is earnt, and it's far too early days to go around claiming such nonsense in any case.


As Thornley points out, this is a team that can score tries from nothing. That doesn't have anything to do with luck. The most pleasing aspect of the current squad is the number of line breakers nicely distributed throughout the side from jerseys 1 to 15.


Sititi is a great find, Jordan has the ability to find tiny holes in well structured defences, Clarke has been punching holes in midfield with his power, and Te'lea is a finisher of freakish qualities. Should Roigard be returned to his rightful starting spot, they have a halfback with unbelievable athletic ability who can threaten to find gaps around the ruck all day long.


So yes, this is an imperfect and unfinished team that can sometimes be dominated and flustered, but still has plenty of ability to score more of those "lucky" tries against the rub of play.


It's an ability that was somewhat lost under Foster, but if you look through the "great" era prior, there were plenty of games the ABs probably shouldn't have won, but somehow found a way to win with big plays against momentum.


So I'm happy a bit of "luck" is back in the team. Any team who wishes to become great will need to create a fair bit of it.

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

I think as an assessment of where NZ are, dangerous but incompleet, plus an assessment of ireland's chances to his Irish audience (Not a great team (yet) we have a chance), he is being fair. Every NZ pundit always believes NZ will win every match. But when an Irish pundit dares to say this NZ team isnt "Great" some Kiwis (not you) go spare.

F
Flankly 47 days ago

There are things on the rugby field that are legitimately about luck, but there are not that many. The bounce of the ball can be genuinely good or bad luck. But, in the absence of a dramatic act of God, missing a penalty goal or a dropped goal is not a lottery. To state the obvious, missing a kick at goal is what happens when you are not good enough.


If we're going to talk about England being unlucky then we should also consider how unlucky NZ were with their recalled tries, knock-ons and loose kicks.


In the end NZ scored 3 tries against a very good England defence, and looked quite capable of scoring more. Ireland should ake that seriously.

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

The result was out of NZs hands. NZ were lucky England were not good enough to put a couple of easy chances away to win.

S
SF 47 days ago

Silly article. I'm a Saffa and I've seen and learnt that you never write an AB side off. We've played them too many times to make that mistake. Yes, this current AB team is a little bit off the boil and seem to be stuck in between the way they want to play. But they still beat England. No luck. You make your own luck. This AB team might be losing a few games at the moment, but they will find their feet. They seem to be in the same place the Boks were when Rassie took over in 2018. It's a transition phase. The NH teams must enjoy their opportunities now against this AB team. In a year or so the AB's will be back in the top 2 in world rugby

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

So you disagree with this Journo and you believe that this is in fact a "Great" NZ team?

Otherwise what are you actually talking about?

He is an Irish journalist saying this is not currently a 'great' NZ team, we have a chance here lads. So f**king what?

G
GG 47 days ago

Amazed how all the criticism of the ABs comes from the NH. You will never read or hear any such stuff from Saffa, the Aussies or the Argies. Never. Maybe the ABs side is off the level of the side under Richie McC but they remain the benchmark. They are in transition with the loss of a bunch of WC players and a new coach, so need a bit of time. Their balance in the forwards is still slightly clunky, and they take time to replace their halfbacks who were world class. Have a feeling Ireland will face a smack on the nose this weekend

S
SF 46 days ago

Not from the Aussies or the saffas? Are you serious? What are you smoking champ?

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

Does anybody in the SH believe this team that lost to Argentina and South Africa twice is a "Great" NZ team? No? Then the NH is in agreement with the SH and most of NZ. Move on.

J
Jmann 47 days ago

Get past a RWC quarter final before you start announcing which teams are 'great'.

R
RedWarrior 47 days ago

New Zealand were beaten by Argentina, SA twice, and were lucky England didnt take two gilt edged chances. This is not a 'great' NZ team. Everybody in the SH surely would agree with that journo? Sort your egos out.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

5 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search