Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Irish TV pundit clips up 12 incidents where Boks beasted All Blacks

Analysis details how the Springboks used defence to win them the final

In the aftermath of what was another epic contest in the 2023 Rugby World Cup final, there has been plenty said about how the Springboks edged the All Blacks 12-11 at the Stade de France in Paris.

ADVERTISEMENT

While New Zealand lost their captain to a red card, they lifted their play and had multiple opportunities to score and even take the win, despite trailing all match.

Some fans and pundits have been quick to focus on referee calls, or even the missed Jordie Barrett penalty, as reasons why New Zealand lost, so it was refreshing to come across the views of former Leinster stalwart and Ireland hooker Bernard Jackman, who has looked at things from a defensive point of view.

Defence

92
Tackles Made
209
14
Tackles Missed
37
87%
Tackle Completion %
85%

He’s perfectly illustrated how South Africa’s well disciplined and well executed defensive strategies are what actually won them the match, putting pressure on New Zealand and in a lot of cases, putting an immediate stop to their attacking efforts.

Led by workhorse flanker Pieter-Steph du Toit, who famously made 28 tackles in the final, the Springboks showed that it’s clearly not always attack that wins big matches.

“It was beauty and the beast – the best attacking side that went into the world cup against the best defensive side,” said Jackman on RTE Sport.

“They (the Springboks) pressure everything. They just make you make mistakes through their physical presence, through the speed that they come at you, and it’s phenomenal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jackman takes us through a selection of clips from the final, displaying how the rush defence forced errors from the usually very slick All Blacks side, who a week prior had easily beaten Argentina by forty points.

“The All Blacks had no handling error against Ireland, and they had seven or eight in this game, and it’s not by chance, it’s not down to the weather. It’s down to the pressure.”

The analysis appears to have been appreciated by both South African and neutral fans alike.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Men's Highlights

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Women's Highlights

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

115 Comments
A
Another 462 days ago

I’m a Kiwi and stout All Blacks fan but I don’t think this is unreasonable analysis. However, the notion of the Springboks having an unbreakable defence is more of a cultural stereotype as, in all honesty, the stats just don’t quite add up in this WC to support that point.

SA conceded tries and missed tackles during the knockout games they played in - quite a lot of them, really. I think the critical factor for them was more to do with attitude and confidence, while also using their bench effectively to target the breakdown area late in the game especially. Against France, England and New Zealand they were outplayed for large portions of the game but held on enough to be able to exploit weaknesses when it counted.

For France, their essential weakness (after losing their big lock, Willemse especially) was an inability to slow down and control a game. They attacked aggressively but couldn’t consolidate their lead through set piece control. They could only play at hyper speed, which allowed SA to meet fire with fire using high ball attacking and simple driving play. Every time France scored, SA came straight back at them.

For England, their essential weakness was an inability to score tries as well as a weak reserve front row. They couldn’t accumulate enough points while dominant, which kept SA in touching distance and gave an easy target for SA at the scrum to earn penalties towards the end.

For New Zealand, their weakness stemmed from ill discipline, which itself stemmed from a underlying lack of confidence based on several years of shaky results. When things didn’t go to plan - like referee/TMO decisions not going their way - you could palpably sense a degree of panic in their game. This led to desperate high tackles and the like even when they weren’t needed. This was true throughout the last few years, to be honest. Past NZ teams weren’t necessarily better in any technical sense but were mentally stronger...more confident that things would turn in their favour eventually.

They had it against Ireland, but that was after months of analysis, a very smooth build up in the Group stages, and they were helped a little by Irish overconfidence too. SA weren’t overconfident as much as they were cussed and defiant which is a different mindset.

If teams want to learn from the World Cup and improve next time, they need to honestly address these weaknesses rather than beating their nationalistic chests or blaming the referee.

B
Bob Marler 518 days ago

Sjoe. I’m jelly of Leinster already.

An attack mindset in defence is very clever. Instead of being passive - you maximize every minute of the game whether you have the ball or not. Nienaber will be missed but long may his influence last.

D
Dr A 518 days ago

209 tackles v 92 is an INSANE stat for a final. I’ve always thought, this is a game of who wants it more and the Boks wanted it more. 209 vs 92 shows who wanted it more.

The fact is this.

This All Blacks side was one of the worst on record, coached by the worst coach in our history. First, world cup pool loss, Argie home loss, Irish home series loss, 69% win record for a coach is horrific, most losses as an AB coach.

And worst of all - the head to head records v our arch rivals, Ireland, SA and France. Here Foster came in at 38%.

I don’t know why we are all disappointed about the final loss because the numbers above tell a story of a team that should have just got out of pool play and got shot.

T
Timgrugpass 519 days ago

One could not read a more vacuous & self involved article, ie less than half of it was the article itself, the rest quotes praising itself ie summary, defence stops attack, if it works. Rocket science.

England would be slammed if it had won the same way. Apparently the same makes the Bok superheroes. Pathetic insecurity.

T
Tim 520 days ago

What a bad example, to say their defence won them the game when they missed 37 tackles highlights that the defence wasn’t that good against 14 players.

M
Michael 520 days ago

Geees give it a bone !!!!

T
Terry 520 days ago

Rubbish!

y
yster 521 days ago

Really nicely put, never looked at it from this angle but that is impressive.

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 521 days ago

The problem is words like “actually” and “always” as if defensive intensity and strategy are not “playing” rugby or not conducive to a “positive, flowing game.” As Wittgenstein and co. have taught us, the problem is in our language.

N
NJ 521 days ago

No other team defends like the Springboks, Best D in this universe ;p. I hope this team can take it up a gear from here!!!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Andrea Irvine 51 minutes ago
Blues lose All Black for season ahead of Hurricanes derby

I can rewire a human brain, course through the most sensitive neural pathways, and restore life with steady hands and a sharp scalpel. But it would appear none of those prepared me for the horror of a hardware wallet that had decided it wanted to self-destruct. It had been years since my Ledger device had sat comfortably in my drawer, unvexed and pristine, like a relic from my earlier Bitcoin investment days. Then came the fateful evening when I decided to switch it on just to check on my stash. That is when I was greeted by an error message so incomprehensible that it could as well have been written in ancient hieroglyphics. At first, I kept calm. I had been in life-and-death situations before, so surely, I could troubleshoot a problem with my wallet. Rebooting? Nothing. Firmware reset? Even worse. With every attempt, my precious $680,000 worth of Bitcoin seemed to slip further from my grasp. The real panic set in when I realized that I had stored my recovery phrase somewhere "safe"-so safe that even I couldn't remember where it was. Hours of frantic searching, multiple YouTube tutorials, and a last-ditch effort to reach out to Ledger support resulted in one grim conclusion: "Your funds may be irretrievable." As a neurosurgeon, I’m used to bad news—but this? Unacceptable. That is when I discovered TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY. A little skeptical I was- if they couldn't help me, a manufacturer of the device, then how would anyone else? I had nothing to lose. The moment I reached out to them, I knew I had done the right thing: I was professional, transparent, and confident that they could recover my lost Bitcoin. They performed some kind of digital wallet emergency surgery, getting everything back in six days. Through what can only be described as magic, by way of forensic techniques, they bypassed corruption and extracted my private keys and every Satoshi, to boot. If it stopped there, that would've been great; then they walked me through how to properly secure my assets going forward more "too safe to find" backups. I may be the expert in the operating room, but when it comes to resuscitating a dead crypto wallet, TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY is your team on call. Cold storage has failed; don't try to self-operate, just get the pros in before your Bitcoin flatlines. VISIT THEM ONEMAIL: Techcybersforcerecovery@cyberservices.comTELEGRAM: @TECHCYBERFORCWhatsApp: +1 561 726 36 97

3 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘Redefine the future’: India unveils revolutionary Rugby Premier League ‘Redefine the future’: India unveils revolutionary Rugby PL
Search