Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

An irreverent and microscopic look at Leinster's secret to success

Terming anything ‘the best’ is usually subjective. It’s a matter of opinion, to be debated and discussed. And yet, the phrase ‘Leinster are the best team in Europe’ is just an indisputable fact.

ADVERTISEMENT

On their journey to a record-equalling fourth European Cup, Leinster smashed out of the way the English champions, the Pro14 champions, the defending European champions, the Pro14 leaders, the Top14 leaders, and, in the final, a massive bag of money masquerading as a rugby team. Leinster have taken on every challenge presented to them, and passed them all with an array of flying colours that would make Israel Folau dizzy.

On the surface, Leinster should not be as successful as they are. Their captain, Isa Nacewa, is so old even his hair has wrinkles and these days he runs like he has a permanent erection. They’re coached by a team comprising of the man behind the most high-profile coaching failure in rugby history, and a guy with about as much experience being a coach as a bus making its first long-haul journey.

Their squad is mostly made up of boys from the local area, promoted rather than recruited, the same strategy used by the Dragons, which, it goes without saying, is perhaps not the best model to follow.

Video Spacer

Except none of these things are actually negatives, because Leinster have always gone with what works, rather than what should work. Nacewa is still putting in man of the match performances between crosswords, the squad just won the Champion’s Cup, and the coaching team was a stroke of low-level genius.

When club legend Leo Cullen, a man with a fish-face that could have saved Guillermo del Toro a fortune in special effects, was appointed head coach of Leinster it stunk of jobs for the boys. However, Cullen’s career paid off: As a player and captain, Leo Cullen was never the star. He was a guy who worked hard and got the best out of those around him, and he’s become the same as a coach.

Somewhere in the step to professionalism, rugby has apparently adopted the auteur theory from French cinema, credit for a side usually goes solely to the head coach. But with Leinster, the thing Cullen deserves most kudos for is building a team who can do their jobs exceptionally well.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2016, Cullen appointed Stuart Lancaster. Lancaster is best remembered as the England coach who got them dumped out of their own World Cup in the pool stages. However, people forget everything that happened in the four years prior to that. Lancaster established a team culture and playing style with England that has very much formed the foundations for everything Eddie Jones has since done, and hauled the team back to being respectable from the borderline calamity left behind by Martin Johnson.

The coaching team split responsibilities between them, taking two jobs each: Cullen takes care of the forwards and man-management, Lancaster structures attack and defence. Girvan Dempsey works with the backs, and gets forgotten by the press.

The gameplan is essentially a huge, brutal game of Bop-It, forcing defenders to make decisions quicker and quicker, knowing eventually they’re going to slip up and miss the ‘SLAP IT’ cue. Opposition allowing, Leinster like to play at a faster and faster pace as phases go on, until eventually a defence can’t keep up. Even if they’re reading their pattern play, this doesn’t give them opportunity to get a defensive line set up in time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking of pattern play, Leinster use dummy runners better than any other club side out there. On any strike move, they invariably have three or four players running off Sexton, who are all able and likely to get the ball, meaning a defence has to watch all the runners, not knowing which are the dummies. You’d wonder how Leinster always seem to have so many, but I figure it must be because Rob Kearney has bought so many dummies down the years they probably have plenty lying around in reserve.

Leinster’s dummy lines are about confusing a defender, putting doubt in their mind. There’s never a right or wrong way to play rugby, no matter what Quade Cooper’s career might suggest, but most teams approach dummy runners incorrectly. Sides such as England and Wales use dummy runners to distract a defence. To prevent them seeing what they’re cooking up on attack.

However, if the runner doesn’t stand a realistic chance of receiving the ball, the whole move is pointless; it’s just someone flapping about in the defender’s peripheral vision. The to-be tackler is already ignoring plenty of them in the crowd. You might as well just put your loosehead in a silly hat and tell them to do the Macarena. An international-standard defence is going to see right through what you’re doing either way.

Leinster’s attack, on the other hand, is built around options. Each player runs lines off the next, meaning even if a defence does read their planned play, Sexton can just select another runner and start a different move. It’s likely the dummy runners are coached to expect the ball just the same as they would if they were part of the plan. If they don’t think they’re a dummy runner themselves, the defence is all the less likely to think so too. In fact, we probably need another name for dummy runners who don’t know they’re dummy runners. I quite like Buzz Lightyear runners.

These Buzz runners continue to occur in every phase, too, not killed after the initial strike move as per most teams. There’s an immaculate attention to detail in all of Leinster’s play, not just the flashy first-phase work you’ll see over and over in slow motion, including in my own videos.

Every phase is approached as either first-phase, or a chance to set up a new first-phase. Forward drives and carries are varied and pitch-wide, and allow them to generate quick ball and attack off a new position.

Instead of carrying by the guard of the ruck, you’ll often see Leinster spread their pods out. Where possible, they’ll look to carry into players who are not renowned jacklers. Dan Leavy’s break against Saracens (As seen at 7:15 in the video) was a product of him shuffling out wider, to avoid a clump of jackle-happy Sarries. He happened to find space in the process, so when the ball found him, it was straight through the middle.

They’re always good at generating quick ball, but in the European semi-final against the Scarlets, Leinster went through phases faster than Marvel Studios will when they hit full cash-cow mode. The Scarlets normally play a very effective rush defence, charging in on an opposition to reduce their time on the ball. However, as Leinster’s ball was so quick, they couldn’t get into position, never mind actually blast their faces.

Video Spacer

On one level, Leinster are just very smart and very good at the basics, but there’s also some fascinating innovation going on. In order to explain this most effectively, I’m first going to go back to those basics, and explain what a breakdown is.

Upon completion of the tackle, the ball carrier has to release the ball and in order to do so, may place it once in any direction, at which point the opposition may try to steal it, prompting the ball carrier’s teammates to go in and protect it. This creates a ruck.

When talking about ball retention, most teams focus on the players clearing out, looking for new techniques to smash. But, to go full secondary school English lesson for a second, let’s look at that ruck description, and ask ourselves: What was the subject of that sentence? It wasn’t the players protecting. It was the ball carrier. So Leinster’s technique for retaining the ball focuses on the ball carrier.

The tactic is very simple. The problem at any breakdown for the team in possession is always a threat nearing the ball. Rather than looking to move the threat, Leinster started to move the ball.

In the example detailed in the video at 5:55, Isa Nacewa is tackled close to the tryline. As he hits the ground, he begins to present the ball as per normal, on the side where he fell. However, the first to the breakdown isn’t one of Nacewa’s nursing home carers, but my personal player of the season, athletic auto-locking octopus, Taigdh Beirne.

Video Spacer

Beirne gets into a great body position, and initiates the octo-grapple. However, Nacewa uses his authorised one movement to roll his entire body round and place it on his left, just as Beirne goes for the ball. Beirne’s octopus targeting system is looking left, but because of Nacewa’s roll, he now has to shift his bodyweight to the right side, in which time support has arrived to remove the two of his eight limbs he shows in public.

There’s an argument that this is double movement and therefore illegal, but no referee is going to risk ruining the flow of the game by penalising it. By exploiting this technicality, Leinster have found a way to deny a player like Beirne or James Davies the half-second they need to steal the ball.

They have continued to deploy this tactic throughout the close-season. Whilst they will use it in tight, it’s used primarily out wide, by Leinster’s outside backs. It allows them to buy an extra second, even if they jackling threat is only a winger, when the player feels they are on their own. It’s possible other teams do this too, but Leinster are the first I’ve noticed employ it as a deliberate and identifiable tactic.

Ball retention is at the heart of Leinster’s attack. This season, Saracens, Scarlets and at times Munster all struggled to deal with the way Leinster shift the point of focus at such speed. If you can retain your ball at the pace Leinster do, it gives you complete control of the game. They can continue to move at a million miles an hour, or they can use the fact the ball is already secured and slow things right down.

Their ability to attack with dummy runners phase after phase is born from the belief they have that they’ll keep hold of the ball. You can run the most complex backs pattern in the world, but it’s a fat lot of good if you lose the ball the next phase because nobody was there to clear out. Their team have a rugby articulacy that allows them to use their skills to their full potential.

This allows, in turn, them to use the incredibly accurate kicking games of halfbacks Luke McGrath and Jonathan Sexton. When in the opposition half, Leinster are happy to keep hold of the ball until something opens itself up. However, except for in desperate, own-tryline circumstances, Leinster tend to make sure each kick is contestable. The old adage goes ‘The kick is only as good as the chase’, and the collective members of Leinster’s back three tend to make sure the kick looks pretty bloody excellent. This allows them to either shut down any counter attack (Especially useful against a side such as the Scarlets who thrive on it), or win the ball back.

So, who can stop Leinster?

Leinster have as close to a complete game as you’ll find in Europe, and it’s all built on the speed of their ruck ball. They’ve played two finals in the last month, and they’ve won two finals in the last month. And yet, they won both in very different manners: One a tight game thanks to territorial control late on, and one a free-flowing encounter where they scored five tries. However, their ability to win in different ways all comes back to their proficiency at the breakdown. Their ability not just to win their own ball, but to win it quickly, quicker than anyone else.

If, like Racing, you’re up against a solid defence you can’t break down no matter what, you’ve given yourself all the tools to beat it regardless. It takes a lot to be the best team in Europe, but Leinster have managed to build a game involving a lot around not a great deal at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
Search