Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Is this the greatest All Blacks v Springboks XV of all time?'

(Photo by Anesh Debiky/AFP via Getty Images)

Last Friday night’s All Blacks versus Springboks clash at Twickenham was one of the most atmospheric occasions at English rugby HQ in many a year, the stadium concourse wedged house before kick-off as excited fans congregated early in great anticipation of a southern hemisphere blockbuster just a fortnight out from the start of the 2023 Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

The novelty of this northern hemisphere venue for this fixture was reflected in programme sales, the issue for this first staging of the Qatar Airways Cup quickly becoming a sell-out.

For those fortunate enough to get a copy, the 64-page issue contained a fantastic debating point article – Is this the greatest All Blacks v Springboks XV of all time?

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

In it, an unnamed writer decided to ignite the debate of what a composite XV of two of the world’s most successful sides would be like.

“Which country boasts the best player in each position is an argument that most Springbok and All Blacks fans will happily bicker over forever,” began the feature.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
0.7
10
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
2.6
13
Entries

“But what would that side look like if we put together a hypothetical, magical first XV composite team from the two most successful sides in rugby history? Let the good-natured arguments commence.”

In the end, the Springboks narrowly shaded the selection, getting eight players included compared to seven All Blacks. Here are the position-by-position picks along with honourable mentions given for the next-best from 15 to nine and one to eight:

ADVERTISEMENT

Composite All Blacks/Springboks XV:
15. Christian Cullen (New Zealand) – Honourable mention: Ben Smith, Willie le Roux;
14. Bryan Habana (South Africa) – HM: John Kirwan, Joe Rokocoko;
13. Jean de Villiers (South Africa) – HM: Jaque Fourie, Conrad Smith ;
12. Ma’a Nonu (New Zealand) – HM: Sonny-Bill Williams, Frans Steyn;
11. Jonah Lomu (New Zealand) – HM: Doug Howlett, James Small;
10. Dan Carter (New Zealand) – HM: Handre Pollard, Andrew Mehrtens;
9. Joost van der Westhuizen (South Africa) – HM: Aaron Smith, Fourie du Preez;
1. Os du Randt (South Africa) – HM: Tony Woodcock, Craig Dowd;
2. John Smit (South Africa) – HM: Sean Fitzpatrick, Bismarck du Plessis;
3. Carl Hayman (New Zealand) – HM: Tendai Mtawarira, Owen Franks;
4. Sam Whitelock (New Zealand) – HM: Victor Matfield, Ian Jones;
5. Bakkies Botha (South Africa) – HM: Brodie Retallick, Eben Etzebeth;
6. Schalk Burger (South Africa) – HM: Jerry Collins, Juan Smith;
7. Richie McCaw (New Zealand) – HM: Michael Jones, Siya Kolisi;
8. Duane Vermeulen (South Africa) – HM: Kieran Read, Zinzan Broke.

Each selection came with a short description of why that particular player was picked. For example, here is what was written about second row Botha: “Most engine rooms need an enforcer and few are bigger and more terrifying than Botha, whose ‘dark arts’ have been etched into rugby folklore.

“A winner of the Rugby World Cup in 2007, Botha also tasted success with Toulon on the Cote d’Azur where his 19st frame, booming laugh and raw power was appreciated by every coach he came into contact with and feared by opponents.”

As for McCaw, the description read: “He wasn’t the biggest back row, he wasn’t the strongest back row and he wasn’t the fastest back row, but McCaw had a top-of-the-range diesel engine that could run and run which, allied to genuine rugby intellect and the smarts to play on the very edge of the rule book, saw him revered globally.

ADVERTISEMENT

“McCaw was also an inspirational leader who would never expect a fellow teammate to do anything he wasn’t prepared to do. A bona fide legend.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

22 Comments
P
Pecos 478 days ago

Zinzan "Broke" indeed.

B
Bob Marler 478 days ago

Andre Joubert ahead of Willie.

Fourie ahead of Joost.

Eben ahead of Bakkies. Sorry Bakkies.

Kieran ahead of Duane. Sorry Duane.

d
dave 478 days ago

Pieter Van Zyl is an incredibly underrated South African specimen. An athletic lightweight compared to South Africa's current props, he had a way of dealing with referees not seen since Bakkes Botha. Caused McCaw to lose his temper which was very hard to do. Would waltz into today's front row rotation in a canter.

R
Rugger 479 days ago

FDp best scrummy - Joost highest points scorer 39 tries in 81 tests almost 1/2 & higher % of tests were vs NZ & Aus [whilst still a serious Union nation]

T
Thomas 480 days ago

I'm not a fan of comparing amateur era players to the pro era. Different sport.
Not a bad list, but I'd make a couple of changes.
Ben Smith over Cullen for me. Percy Montgomery over Willie Le Roux.
Kirwan in HM? LOL. Ahead of Julian Savea, Kolbe, or Mapimpi? Just no way :D
Etzebeth over Botha any day.
Jerome Kaino, the best #6 of all time doesn't even get an HM? Nope.

B
Beaudy 480 days ago

Cant leave beauden out imo, 2x world player of the year. Willie Le roux is good, but not one off the greatest players ever

S
Silk 480 days ago

I would put Fourie du Preez above Joost. Victor Matfield above Whitelock and Zinzan above Vermeulen. Michael Jones above McCaW.
I'm Bok supporter.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 56 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search