Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Is Wade right that English rugby is obsessed by size?

Christian Wade

When Christian Wade sensationally announced his retirement from rugby last week, in order to pursue a career in the NFL, he was candid in his reasons why he had developed such a love-hate relationship with the sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to BBC Sport, Wade claimed that English rugby is too obsessed by size and that it was a challenge that he has had to face throughout his career. From not being picked at 16 years of age to feeling like he had to prove himself throughout his time in the professional game, it all came to a head in 2015.

When Stuart Lancaster didn’t select him in his Rugby World Cup training squad and Eddie Jones never reached out to him following his appointment as England’s new head coach, Wade admitted that that was when he gave up on his hopes of adding to the solitary England cap he won against Argentina in 2013.

England players from left-right, David Pace. Christian Wade, Kyle Eastmond and Richard Wigglesworth before the Test match between Argentina and England at Estadio Padre Ernesto Martearena. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

So, is Wade right? Is English rugby particularly obsessed about size, in a way that other nations aren’t?

Based on Test selections by Tier 1 nations for this coming weekend, the answer is not too supportive to Wade’s claims.

If we take Wade’s height of 1.73m and his weight of 86kg as the baseline, very few players selected fall below that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland have a pair on their bench, with George Horne weighing in at 79kg and Darcy Graham at 75kg. Both players are slightly taller than Wade.

Fellow Six Nations rivals Wales also have some candidates, with starting back three players Luke Morgan (81kg) and Leigh Halfpenny (85kg) sitting below Wade in terms of weight, as does bench scrum-half Tomos Williams, at 77kg. All three players are taller than the former Wasps wing, though.

The All Blacks actually boast two of the three players this weekend to be both lighter and shorter than Wade, with starting scrum-half Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi and bench fly-half Brett Cameron both measuring up at 1.71m and 83kg. Bench scrum-half Mitch Drummond also weighs in at less than Wade at 84kg, but in terms of centres and outside backs, New Zealand don’t have anyone that tips the scales at less than 90kg.

Italy’s starting right wing Giulio Bisegni has a clear height advantage at 1.8m, but only weighs in at 83kg, whilst replacement scrum-half Guglielmo Palazzani stands at 1.77m and 80kg.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks, a side previously known for their obsession with size, can only offer up their starting and bench scrum-halves, with Ivan van Zyl and Embrosie Papier both weighing in at 80kg. Papier is the other player to join the New Zealand half-backs in being both shorter and lighter than Wade.

And it is a similar story with Ireland, where starting scrum-half Luke McGrath is the only player under 86kg, with the Leinsterman listed at 82kg. Like the All Blacks, there is no one outside of nine weighing in at anything less than 90kg in Ireland’s starting back line.

As for England themselves, George Ford only tips the scales at 84kg, but does enjoy a slight height advantage over Wade.

Continue reading below…
Watch: Owen Farrell discusses Tuilagi injury, Ashton call-up and Springboks

Video Spacer

The remaining Tier 1 nations, France, Australia and Argentina, are not in action this weekend.

If you exclude half-backs and fly-halves, given the differing requirements of those positions compared to the outside backs, only Graham, Morgan, Halfpenny and Bisegni weigh less than Wade out of those players featuring this weekend, and all four have height advantages over the former wing.

You could also look at that quartet and suggest that only Halfpenny is a regular starter, with the other three taking opportunities that injuries have provided them. Opportunities, it should be said, that are harder to come by with England, due to the size of the player pool available.

It could be argued that Wade’s weight was an issue for England, but given the scope of other squads picked this week, it seems his height would be an issue for any of the top Test-playing nations in the world.

It’s brutal, but there’s no denying how important the battle for aerial balls is, especially with the recent trend in cross-field kicks, so height is a key influencer in selection.

All of that said, Wade made great strides with his defence and aerial game over the last three or four years and to be denied the opportunity to show that he could cut it at Test level will forever be one of the unanswerable ‘what ifs’ of English rugby.

As a running back and kick returner in the NFL, that diminutive height and low centre of gravity should only aid his elusiveness and hopefully he finds a home that appreciates the undeniable skills that he brings to the mix.

Watch: Scotland flanker Jamie Ritchie previews the game against Wales this weekend.

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search