Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Israel Dagg names his chosen heir to the All Blacks No 10 jersey

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The impending exodus of All Blacks following this year’s Rugby World Cup has New Zealand rugby fans particularly nervous about the future of the infamous black No 10 jersey, with Richie Mo’unga and Beauden Barrett both tiers above their competition and both heading to Japan in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks took three players who can play flyhalf to Europe last year; Mo’unga, Barrett and Stephen Perofeta. The latter is primarily a fullback but given his experience in the All Black camp and brief showings at flyhalf for the Blues, Perofeta is widely considered a leading candidate to take up the mantle in 2024.

The wild card in the mix is the Chiefs’ superstar Damian McKenzie, who is yet to reveal his plans beyond the World Cup.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Talking on SENZ radio, former All Black fullback Israel Dagg named his top three candidates to succeed Mo’unga and excluded McKenzie from the mix.

“I’d take Perofeta,” Dagg said. “He’d be my man that I’d build my team around.

“He’s been in that environment for a year now, he knows what it is. Has played limited time at 10, but I’d take Perofeta.”

For his second option, Dagg opted for 20-year-old Highlanders rookie Cameron Millar. The young playmaker excelled in the New Zealand U20’s side last year and continued his fine form for Otago in the NPC.

“We haven’t seen him but I’ve talked about him a wee bit,” Dagg said of Millar. “I expect he’s going to have a standout season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Might be a wee bit early but get him in there, get him in the environment building for that future.”

Dagg was torn when selecting his third player, with the decision being split between the Chiefs’ Josh Ioane and the Crusaders’ prodigy Fergus Burke.

“It’s either Josh Ioane or (Crusader) Fergus Burke for me. (Both) have been given opportunities at a Super level, have shown good signs that they could potentially kick on.

“(But) if I’m going to pick one, I’m going to pick Josh Ioane.”

Burke joins the Chiefs’ Bryn Gatland as omissions from Dagg’s list who will likely look to put their hat in the mix for a promotion post-World Cup. Brett Cameron’s return to New Zealand shores will draw the eyes of selectors as well, Sir Steve Hansen and co selected the now 26-year-old for a lone All Blacks cap in 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT

19-year-old Taha Kemara joins Cameron Millar as a young gun to watch in the future. The 19-year-old will have a year of stewardship under Richie Mo’unga before he sees any consistent opportunities at Super Rugby level, which will come during Mo’unga’s three-year sabbatical.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
R
Ruby 680 days ago

I'd take Ruben Love over any of them, even though he's primarily a Fullback, he's definitely worth developing in both.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 28 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search