Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It cost us the game, it's as simple as that': Richie Gray rues where Scotland went wrong

Richie Gray of Scotland looks on during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between South Africa and Scotland (Photo by Franco Arland/Quality Sport Images/Getty Images)

Scotland lock Richie Gray had no problem identifying where his side lost the game against South Africa in their World Cup opener in Marseille on Sunday evening, saying his side were not quick enough to react to South Africa’s change in intensity after the break.

ADVERTISEMENT

The world champions went into half-time holding a slender 6-3 lead over a Scotland team that were matching them physically. That even culminated in Gray and his pack winning a scrum penalty on the stroke of half-time, which is a position the Springboks seldom find themselves in. Speaking to RugbyPass after the match, the Glasgow Warriors lock said the team knew that a reaction was coming from the three-time champions, but they were not quick enough to respond in the fifteen minutes following the break.

Points Flow Chart

South Africa win +15
Time in lead
69
Mins in lead
0
85%
% Of Game In Lead
0%
42%
Possession Last 10 min
58%
0
Points Last 10 min
0

“We were feeling good,” the 34-year-old said about Scotland’s mentality at half-time. “Obviously it wasn’t the perfect half by any means, but we put ourselves in a really strong position. We had a big moment before half-time with that scrum. We went in at half-time and we knew there would be a reaction from the Springboks. We had to be accurate coming out the sheds, we simply weren’t in that ten, fifteen minutes after half-time. It cost us the game, it’s as simple as that. You’re going up against the such a good side, to three, six, nine to 18-3 down, chasing it, is not an ideal position and we weren’t accurate enough to do that. So, that ten, fifteen minutes after half-time cost us.”

Related

South Africa immediately came out after the break and won a scrum penalty of their own, which set the tone for what was to come for the rest of the half. Gray pinpointed the noticeable ways Siya Kolisi’s team moved up a gear in the second stanza, as they exhibited their credentials to retain their title against the fifth ranked side in the world.

“They started to move the ball and a little bit more, which was good by them,” he said. “The heat at the breakdown came, the heat at the scrum came, we reacted to it at the end of the game, but just that little bit after half-time we weren’t quick enough.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
D
Dermot 467 days ago

If your auntie had balls she'd be your uncle.

f
fraser 467 days ago

Fact is SA should have been playing a man down for most of the match. Who knows if it would’ve changed the outcome but we deserved to see the impact.

S
Sam 467 days ago

From Brave Heart to No Heart in 20 minutes.

C
Chris 468 days ago

How did it smell?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search