Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It is not up to us to change the way we play because it's not attractive' - Mallett

(Photo by Francois Nel/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Former Springboks coach Nick Mallett has defended South Africa’s brand of rugby, which has been pilloried in recent months for its conservative nature and emphasis on kicking.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks beat Argentina 29 – 10 in the second of a two-match series in Port Elizabeth yesterday, with the boot of Handre Pollard playing a major role in the victory. The Springboks have won five of their last six Test matches, their sole loss coming against the British & Irish Lions in the first game of the series in July.

Yet their style of play has been heavily criticised by pundits and even rival coaches. All Blacks head coach Ian Foster said the Lions series ‘put him to sleep’ and even former Springboks have criticized the turgid brand of rugby that the Boks play.

Video Spacer

What Sacrifice means to the Black Ferns | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

What Sacrifice means to the Black Ferns | Healthspan Elite

Mallett, who coached the Springboks between 1996 and 2000 said that the crucial point is that Jacques Nienber’s side are winning and shouldn’t be ashamed to play to their strengths.

“Test matches are there to win, and what Rassie and Jacques have done is they have gotten the team to win,” said Mallett on Super Sport. “The Springboks play within the laws, we were penalised far less than Argentina, even with the passion with which we play the game.

“So don’t criticise South Africa for playing this type of Test match rugby when they can win. If they lost, then you can criticise them. 57-0 in 2017 against the All Blacks, 38-3 against Ireland, with exactly the same group of players.

“In 2017 we suffered humiliating losses when we tried to run the ball, it didn’t work much. Now we’re beating the teams that beat us by plenty before by playing to our strength.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is not up to us to change the way we play because it’s not attractive. You play the way you play best in order to beat the opposition. If people want to change the way we play, they have to change the laws. Because we’re the best at what we do.”

Mallett laid down the gauntlet to New Zealand.

“So let’s get New Zealand over here, they’re the best at running the ball. We’re the best at tackling people who run the ball and turning them over.

“We’ve got a far better set-piece than them, we’ve got a better maul than them, we’ve got a better kicking game than them. It’s a clash of two different styles of play.”

The Springboks will remain in Nelson Mandela Bay until a decision is taken on the re-scheduling of the Rugby Championship’s remaining fixtures and Nienaber said they were ready for any eventuality. SA Rugby have offered to host the remainder of the games, all on South African soil.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search