Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It was nasty, very hostile... a shameful second half'

England No4 Martin Bayfield was stamped on the head by the French in 1992 (Photo by Ross Kinnaird/EMPICS via Getty Images)

Former Test referee Owen Doyle has recalled in his new book the infamous 1992 Five Nations Parc des Princes encounter between France and England. The Irish official had taken charge of the championship games between the two countries in 1988 and 1990 in Paris before serving as the fourth official for the 1991 World Cup quarter-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fall-out from that knockout match which was won by England provided an angsty backdrop to the 1992 championship renewal, an x-rated match that became the first and only time that two players from one team were sent off in Five Nations history. French front-rowers Vincent Moscato and Gregoire Lascube were both given their marching orders in a second half that Doyle explained had shamefully nothing to do with rugby.

Writing in The Ref’s Call, Doyle, who retired as a Test referee in 1994 and went on to become IRFU director of referees from 1995 to 2015, provided a colourful insight into the tense rivalry at the time that resulted in the France versus England fixture being branded Le Crunch.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“Before the 1990 fixture, England captain Will Carling asked me if I wouldn’t mind repeating in English anything that I said in French. Not being able to communicate with one of the teams in moments of high tension undoubtedly makes the task more difficult.

“However, no amount of French-speaking could have prevented the events that unfolded in February 1992 in Paris when Stephen Hilditch was the man in the middle, with myself and Brian Stirling his assistants. In fact, had Hilditch been the Master of the Tower of Babel, it would have been to no avail.

England France 1992 Doyle book
Vincent Moscato of France is sent off in the 1992 Le Crunch with England (Photo by Ross Kinnaird/EMPICS via Getty Images)

“The sides played a torrid encounter at Parc des Princes the previous October in a World Cup quarter-final. The English had torn into the French from the off, and France felt the aggression was way over the top, though they themselves were no shrinking violets. That match was refereed by New Zealander David Bishop, a fine referee, with Hilditch and Bishop’s fellow countryman Keith Lawrence on the touchlines. I was the designated fourth official.”

ADVERTISEMENT

England went on to win 19-10 to qualify for the World Cup semi-finals, an outcome that left a bad taste for the beaten France. “Nothing was ever going to convince the French that they hadn’t had a rough ride from the referee,” continued Doyle.

“After the match, as we made our way back to the dressing rooms, Daniel Dubroca ‘approached’ David Bishop, manhandling him as he vented his spleen in no uncertain fashion. I wasn’t close enough to hear the actual words but – later on – the word ‘cheat’ was in the air.

“The coach [Dubroca] was left with no choice but to resign and was replaced by former French scum-half Pierre Berbizier just a year after he retired from playing…

“When the Five Nations came around a mere six months after that World Cup meeting, there was no doubt that France were not going to be intimidated in Paris and that neither team would give an inch. The pre-match atmosphere was tense but, given what we had seen in October, no more than we were anticipating. Or so we thought.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Being frank, nothing could have prepared us for the events of the second half. The last 20 minutes were particularly awful, and nothing to do with rugby. Every ounce of our cumulative experience was needed to keep a modicum of control in what was a shameful second half.

“It was the first, and only, time that two players from one team were sent off in Five Nations history, the French front-rowers Vincent Moscato and Gregoire Lascube both dismissed… Hilditch, Stirling and myself took the brunt of the crowd’s anger. It was nasty, very hostile and very far from the usual crowd reaction to unpopular decisions.

“First, Lascube stamped on Martin Bayfield’s head, an incident I managed to see… It was the first sending-off at Test level on the advice of an assistant referee; it was also an easy call. It was gratuitous and avoidable serious foul play.

“A scrum broke up in complete disarray with punches thrown by both front rows after it appeared that Moscato led with his head. Hilditch read the riot act and was very clear in his instructions.

“There could be no more of it. But as the scrum engaged for the second time, Moscato clearly head-butted Jeff Probyn. Again, the ref was left with absolutely no choice; Moscato was sent off. Determined not to leave the field of play, Philippe Saint-Andre had to escort him off the pitch.”

England eventually beat France 31-13 and unlike now, when disciplinary hearings are held in the midweek after a match, suspensions were handed down to Lascube and Moscato that very same day of the game. “The disciplinary panel met immediately after the match and both French players were suspended for six months; neither would be selected to play for their country again…

“When news of the suspensions filtered back to the hotel, some members of the French Federation were incensed and the normally enjoyable evening was not particularly pleasant. The security escort off the pitch was a good idea, but we didn’t expect to need one at the dinner too.

“On our arrival back in Dublin, we learned that the French Federation had reviewed events and actually extended the length of the suspensions… When we returned the following year for France vs Wales, sincere apologies were forthcoming and we were treated royally throughout the weekend, particularly at the post-match dinner.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 20 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search