Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It wasn't in my mind to check whether there was fake blood... I hadn't come across that before or even heard talk of it'

Harlequins' Tom Williams walks off with physio Steph Brennan to be replaced by Nick Evans (not in picture) as fake blood pours from his mouth (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Nigel Owens has admitted there was nothing more he could have done at The Stoop 10 years ago when the Bloodgate saga played out in the infamous Harlequins-Leinster European Cup quarter-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Welsh official was referee on that never forgotten Sunday a decade ago when Quins got winger Tom Williams to bite into a fake blood capsule so that Dean Richards could get his kicker Nick Evans back on the field as a blood sub in a match the Londoners were to lose 5-6.

Writing in his weekly walesonline.com column, Owens reflected how the controversy unfolded and is still incredulous Harlequins tried to cheat their way to victory. 

“Could I have done anything more to prevent the above events unfolding? Probably not,” wrote the referee about a bust-up that would surely have had far deeper repercussions had Leinster not won the quarter-final en route to winning the trophy that season.

“Call me naive and overly trusting, but it certainly didn’t cross my mind that something like that would happen in rugby. I wasn’t qualified to go over and test whether there was fake blood.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

“Had I asked to see the cut, the people handling Williams could have told me it was at the back of his throat and so wasn’t visible. Not being medically trained, I wouldn’t have been able to agree with that contention or dispute it.

“There has to be an element of trust. In those days, there was no neutral match-day doctor. My concern when Williams left the pitch was to make sure Evans had earlier been substituted for a tactical reason rather than an injury. Had he gone off for the latter, he would not have been allowed to return.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Once I had established he had been subbed for tactical reasons it was permissible to allow him to replace a team-mate with a blood injury. It wasn’t in my mind to check whether there was fake blood. I’d seen a lot in the game, but I hadn’t come across that before or even heard talk of it.”

The first Owens really knew that something dubious had taken place was when he entered the changing room following the match to be to Leinster had made an allegation concerning the use of fake blood. He went on to add that he had little to do with the ensuing investigation, merely telling those who asked at the inquest what he has seen and done at the time. 

Ten years on from the fall-out, he insisted rugby must continue to be vigilant if it is to keep its integrity. “Some good did come from the episode because it proved a watershed moment for rugby union,” he said. 

“It raised awareness and let people know that our sport can be affected by cheating as much as any other sport. But rugby deals with these issues and we haven’t seen the like of it since — certainly nothing so wild and audacious.

ADVERTISEMENT
Malcolm O’Kelly (second left) celebrates Leinster’s victory on the final whistle (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

“We can’t take the moral high ground as things do go on in our sport that are unacceptable but rugby tends to deal with the issues firmly but fairly.

“I don’t want to come over all preachy, but no matter how much cash is involved, we have to uphold the integrity of the game. This was more than gamesmanship and pushing the boundaries.

“It was cheating and bringing the game into disrepute. There’s a line that shouldn’t be crossed in sport. Sadly, a decade ago, such a border was crossed.”

WATCH: Jim Hamilton explore the rugby sights of South Africa

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 2 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search