Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It'd be a disaster': Foster's warning to NZR over All Black eligibility

Beauden Barrett and Coach Ian Foster talk prior to a New Zealand All Blacks team photo at the InterContinental on October 09, 2020 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

All Blacks head coach Ian Foster has warned New Zealand Rugby not to tinker with All Blacks eligibility and allow overseas-based players to wear the black jersey.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks are set to lose a host of veteran players after the 2023 Rugby World Cup but many of those have already had long and rewarding careers in New Zealand.

Foster conceded that allowing overseas-based All Blacks would strengthen the team from a depth point of view, but would be detrimental as whole.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I think from an All Blacks perspective, purely selfishly from an All Blacks view, it makes some academic sense,” Foster told Jason Pine on Newstalk ZB.

“But for New Zealand Rugby as a whole, I think it would be a disaster.

“We’ve got a Super Rugby competition that has feed our national team for many, many years.

“I don’t think the Super Rugby competition is perfect at the moment. It needs a bit of work.

“But it’s the development path, it’s where we develop our players. We are able to work with the franchises in that space.

“We need to make sure we are selling that product to the public and we are growing our young players with the older players around them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The minute we open up the door, we know the worldwide demand for our players is huge.”

Overseas eligibility was floated for departing first five Beauden Barrett last year in the media but quickly shot down by New Zealand Rugby.

The All Blacks are set to lose Crusaders’ No 10 Richie Mo’unga on a three-year deal to Toshiba along with Highlanders’ flanker Shannon Frizell.

However, they have been able to retain a number of big names coming off-contract like Scott Barrett, Samisoni Taukei’aho and Rieko Ioane which has eased concerns of a mass exodus.

Foster preferred All Blacks to stay and play in New Zealand to keep the club competition as strong as possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think we will lose a lot of our top players and it will dilute our domestic competition too much,” Foster said.

“There are pros and cons either way but I think we have to look at the game as a whole.

“They need to stay and play here.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
D
David 601 days ago

well its happened before remember luke mccallaster in1999 being called up to replace dan carter in australia and didnt hansen bring back a crusader called matt todd ithinkit was him from japan for2019 and took him to the world cup

A
Andrew 601 days ago

Good grief....Fozzie said something sensible...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search