Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's skill execution' - Foster looking to build from disappointing draw after missed opportunities at the death

Captain Sam Cane and Coach Ian Foster of New Zealand speak to media after the Bledisloe Cup match between the New Zealand All Blacks and the Australian Wallabies at Sky Stadium on October 11, 2020 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

A new era for All Blacks rugby got off to a shaky start in Wellington on Sunday, with the Wallabies holding the hosts to a famous 16-all draw. But Australia also came within a posts-width of securing what would’ve been an historic victory, with a monstrous Reece Hodge penalty just missing the target.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not only was it the first test match for either team this year, but it was also Ian Foster and Sam Cane maiden test since taking the reigns of the national side as permanent coach and captain respectively.

After the nearly 90 minutes of rugby, both Foster and Cane were clearly disappointed with the result – with the Captain carrying the wounds of the test with him into the post-match press conference.

Video Spacer

All Blacks | Bledisloe 1 2020 | Post match press conference

Video Spacer

All Blacks | Bledisloe 1 2020 | Post match press conference

James O’Connor put plenty of pressure on the All Blacks late but kicking a penalty with just over five minutes to play, before Jordie Barrett cancelled it out with a penalty of his own in the 79th minute. After the missed Hodge penalty, the rugby in stoppage time would’ve had all rugby fans on the edge of their seat, with both teams having chances to win the test.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CGOi-bOA2nJ/

When the sound of the siren was a distant memory, and with the scores still locked, the All Blacks had the ball inside the Australian 22 with a drop goal looking like a potential option. But instead the All Blacks continued to attack, and it nearly paid off for them.

While they didn’t get the points they were after, Foster is taking plenty out of those final few moments.

“I thought we calmed ourselves down, we were well set up under the goalposts. You’ll see Richie [Mo’unga] was hovering around in that position but Jordie [Barrett] called the ball and it was actually a pretty solid decision in its own because George Bridge was pretty well unmarked out the side,” Foster said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s skill execution, we just couldn’t quite get the ball out where it needed to be. That hurts.

“It’s a message to us all that test rugby is back and if you’re not good enough in those big moments, then you don’t get what you want.”

Another key moment that Foster refused to blame the result on came on the stroke of half-time, with centre Rieko Ioane dropping the ball over the line with no defenders near him.

The All Blacks led by five points at the time, but Ioane decided to put the ball down with one hand. The hosts could’ve potentially have led by as much as 12 going into the break.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It would’ve been useful. He’s feeling pretty frustrated with himself but that’s one of those little lessons that players have to go through and I thought he had a reasonably strong game apart from that.

“That’s why they’re called test matches, you’ve got to take those little moments and when you get a little slopping, it can come back and bite you.

“You can’t dwell on errors in test matches, there’s a whole lot of errors before that and a whole lot of errors after that, but there’s certainly some learnings.

“Part of international rugby is that you make an error and you move on. He’s a confident young man and he’s got to learn from that one little thing, but he can also focus on the whole lot of good things he did in that game too.”

Cane was particularly impressive for the All Blacks, making 26 tackles and securing two turnovers with his work around the breakdown. It was a tough night for the men in black jerseys, who were made to make over 100 more tackles than their opponents in the first Bledisloe Cup test.

“In test matches, you can’t be defending the whole time. It’d be quite nice to apply a wee bit more pressure with the ball and I think that will be an area of focus for us this week,” Cane reflected.

“I’m also really proud of the desire, the attitude at the end, the willingness to keep playing.

“Lots of emotions but as buggered as you are after a test match like that and a result like that, I’m already looking forward to the next one.”

The result sees the equation for the Bledisloe Cup effectively changing for both teams, with the series now going to a best of three format.

Auckland will host the next test on the 18th at Eden Park, at place the Wallabies haven’t beaten the All Blacks at since 1986.

“The Bledisloe is important for us and this test showed where both teams are at, and both teams will walk away with a lot of positives and a lot of stuff that they’ll think that they can go and do better next week.

“It bodes for a great series, and hopefully that gets people excited but we can’t wait for Eden Park now. We’ve got a job to do and Eden Park is pretty special for us and we want to play well up there, and we’re going to have to.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 23 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search