Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's a TMO's paradise... 34 different cameras will cover the RWC semi-finals and final

TMO referrals are now common in rugby, but more camera angles will be available at RWC 2019 (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Television match officials at the World Cup are going to be spoilt for choice when it comes to reviewing footage at the finals. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2019 tournament is the first World Cup where broadcast production will be completely produced and controlled by World Rugby.

One of the steps that will be taken to enhance coverage of the sport is to have a total of 34 cameras covering all angles for the semi-finals and the final, rising from the 28 and 23 camera plans used for other categories of matches during the six-week tournament.

That multi-angle coverage is aimed at setting new standards in rugby broadcast production in the hope of achieving a record global footprint by attracting new fans and showcasing the sport in higher quality than ever before.

World Rugby reckons Japan 2019 will set a rugby broadcast record as the action is set to be available to more than 800million households in 217 territories once all rights deals are announced, surpassing the 683m homes record in 2015. 

The governing body claims these figures underline its commitment to expand the sport’s reach from its current 800m following and to engage with the next generation of fans across the globe.

“Our mission is to grow the global rugby family and our World Cup 2019 broadcast plans reflect that mission – providing more content to more people with more innovation than ever before,” said Bill Beaumont, the World Rugby chairman. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are excited that new standards will be set in the broadcast and social media presentation of World Cup, as fans will experience the action from more angles and feel even closer to the world’s top players and the stories that will mark a historic and very special event.” 

In a further enlivening development, augmented reality (AR) graphics will be incorporated into the coverage for 34 of the 48 matches for elements such as team line-ups, player comparisons, statistics and tables. 

Rugby World Cup 2019 by the numbers

1st Rugby World Cup hosted in Asia

6 worldwide partners renewed in record time with a record value

9th Rugby World Cup

ADVERTISEMENT

12 host cities from Sapporo in the north to Kumamoto in the south

20 teams

48 matches

55 team camps

94 teams involved in the qualification

217 broadcast territories *when all broadcast deals are announced

3,000 media in attendance

13,000 volunteers

25,000 disadvantaged children in Asia who will benefit from ChildFund Pass It Back support

400,000+ international visitors

600,000 tickets sold to international fans from the Antarctic to Russia

1.16 million Impact Beyond Asia 1 million project participants to date

1.5 million+ tickets sold to date 

£1.5 million pledged to ChildFund Pass it Back from fans and commercial partners 

1.8 million attendance

5.5 million tickets applied for 

14 million rugby fans in Japan

40 million anticipated domestic broadcast audience for the opening match

90 million+ RWC awareness in Japan (77.4 per cent of the population) 

112 million rugby fans in Asia 

500 million+ live broadcast audience

800 million broadcast households

Y216.6 billion (£2.97BN) added value to the Japanese economy – a record

WATCH: Part one of Operation Jaypan, the two-part RugbyPass documentary on what the fans can expect to experience at the World Cup in Japan

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 35 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search