Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's an easy fix. Very easy': Plea to World Rugby to sort Folau Fakatava's All Black eligibility

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The extension of World Rugby’s residency qualification rule next year from three to five years has thrown a spanner in the works for those on the verge of debuting for their new countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Highlanders halfback Folau Fakatava is one of those players for New Zealand, who would’ve likely debuted for the All Blacks in 2021 had he not suffered a season-ending injury. As an uncapped player, Fakatava is now subject to the five year residency rule which would delay his potential capping until 2023.

New Zealand’s Players’ Assocation CEO Rob Nichol is calling on World Rugby to preserve the eligibility of those who had already served the necessary three years, provided their residency status does not change.

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 3:57
Loaded: 4.18%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 3:57
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

    “It’s not just about Folau, it’s an anomaly that’s been created through the way the regulation has been altered,” Nichol said in an interview with Stuff.co.nz.

    “It’s been highlighted, and it’s now up to World Rugby if they choose to fix it.

    “It’s an easy fix. Very easy. It’s literally just to say that once you have qualified, based on your residency, you maintain that qualification so long as you remain resident.”

    The extension of the residency rule was supposed to strengthen the integrity of the international game but the new rules regarding eligibility switching seemingly contradicts the approach taken to the residency qualification rule.

    Players can now switch nation eligibility after completing a stand down period, as long as they have a birthright connection to that second nation, which means going forward players can represent multiple countries throughout their international careers.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Should World Rugby fail to amend the residency rule, Fakatava won’t be able to represent the All Blacks until 2023 but he still remains eligible for Tonga, his nation of birth where he grew up until moving at age 16 to New Zealand.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

    USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

    Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    4 Comments
    J
    Jmann 1332 days ago

    He absolutely should be able to play for his adopted country. The only reason he wasn't capped was due to an injury. But we all know that WR have zero intention of ever doing a single thing to help NZ.


    They should have rolled him out on crutches for the last 10secs of a game to avoid having to turn to WR for a logical and helpful outcome.

    L
    LL 1333 days ago

    He can play for Tonga immediately then, if he keeps his residency in NZ play for them later. But that's not how NZ does things. They want the prime playing years from Island players, then toss them back to their home countries.


    Since he wasn't capped in 2021 under the old rules, he has to wait.

    S
    Shane 1331 days ago

    He's been in NZ since he was 16. The main thing has nothing to do with NZ he is an Adult and its his decision who he wants to play for. Its absolutely hypocrisy from some nations where they get a tonne of NZ born players, but plead cultural sensitivities. You either want one rule that is born in a country or not. If not, then you have to abide by other rules, you cannot cherry pick.

    A
    Andy 1332 days ago

    The reason he isn't eligible is because world rugby don't recognise his residency in NZ while he was Under 18. Being a minor, they base his residency on his parents. If they accepted all the years he's been in NZ, he'd have 5 years.

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    N
    NB 37 minutes ago
    Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

    There are already reports of French clubs hoovering Aussie teenage talent and it made big waves down under https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250417-rugby-australia-hits-out-at-french-clubs-poaching-young-talent - big enough for Dan Herbert to come out and challenge the legality of the policy. Also they set up academy ‘shops’ in the Pac Islands a while back.


    The sheer size of the Top 14 season wil demand squads as big as in the NFL in future, esp if they stick to their welfare guns more rigorously. That will mean more JIFF products and more young overseas ‘graduates’!

    5 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France