Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's night and day between Handre Pollard and the Lions flyhalves

(Photos/Gettys Images)

There shouldn’t be much stress for returning Springbok flyhalf Handre Pollard about his job ahead of his return from injury for the reigning World Cup holders.

ADVERTISEMENT

When you have the easiest job of any 10 in world rugby, what is there to worry about?

Sit behind a big pack, watch them carry all day, enjoy the theatre while your scrumhalf is responsible for controlling nearly all aspects of the game.

This should make Pollard’s return as seamless and smooth as humanly possible against Georgia despite playing just four games recently for Montpellier.

Video Spacer

Beating the Lions – ultimate trailer

Video Spacer

Beating the Lions – ultimate trailer

Bark some orders at your forwards, hoist a few bombs and kick a few penalties. Watch your team smother the opposition on defence.

The only thing that he needs to do is ensure he is on-song from the tee and limit his mistakes. Just don’t mess up on the rare occasion the ball comes your way and kick the goals.

The contrast with the Lions’ stable of flyhalves is night and day.

Whoever eventually starts at 10 for the tourists, Dan Biggar, Owen Farrell or Finn Russell, will be central to any Lions’ game plan with the series essentially resting on their shoulders.

They will be responsible for pulling off the strike plays, embedded with different roles in the array of plays that ask the Lions’ backs to find answers to the Boks defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

On some they will be distributors tasked with holding up the defence just enough, on others they will be the primary playmaker responsible for committing the defence and picking the right option.

They will handle the ball on most phases, guide runners into gaps, link with their outsides, control the side’s phase play, choose when to play for territory in midfield zones and dictate terms from the backfield.

They will digest, and try and master over the next few weeks, a grand plan of schemes of which the success heavily depends on them.

Sure, there are plays that call on Pollard to make a pass every now and again, on the rare occasion the call isn’t for Damian de Allende to truck up another carry from Faf de Klerk.

ADVERTISEMENT

The flyhalf is quintessential to the European game as much as it is for New Zealand. The flyhalf is not a backseat passenger who turns up when the captain calls for a shot at goal. That is the South African way.

It is a fundamental difference in philosophies on how to play the game, on who is responsible for the winning of the game and in what manner. And for South Africa, the flyhalf is there to kick goals and stay out of the way.

Need proof?

Not one South African 10 has ever been nominated, let alone won, the World Rugby Player of the Year award in the 20 years it has been around.

The list of flyhalf nominees is as follows: Jonny Wilkinson (twice), Dan Carter (four times), Juan Martin Hernandez (once), Owen Farrell (three times), Jonathan Sexton (twice), Frederic Michelak (once) and Beauden Barrett (three times).

There’s no mention of Butch James, Ruan Pienaar, Morne Steyn, or Pollard. The Springboks who are nominated are usually an exemplary forward, an outstanding outside back or their main game driver – the scrumhalf.

This is not to say they aren’t capable players. Pollard himself was a genuine all-round prospect at under-20 level with vast talents coming through the system.

However, there are only a handful of games in his Springbok career so far that warrant even talking about – New Zealand in Johannesburg in 2014, Scotland at Murrayfield in 2018 and perhaps Argentina in Salta in 2019.

The South African flyhalves simply do not have the body of work to earn such recognition. They aren’t entrusted to play a varied and skilled game at the international level that calls upon, and tests, their ability in multiple facets.

Those wanting Pollard recognised as one of the world’s best need to first ask the Springbok coaches to change the entire game plan so he can prove it.

Although in doing so you may witness a return to the 2016-17 Springboks who tried to adopt an expansive game and became a lost soul, unsure of their identity, and subsequently plummeted down the World Rankings.

The Springboks can win this Lions series with Morne Steyn at 10. On form, you would pick him. He’s healthy, in vintage touch and has all the experience in the world. He’s a better goal kicker too.

Steyn or Pollard, take your pick. All that matters is that they kick goals. And if Pollard can do that, he will play. He doesn’t need to do anything else.

The difference for the Lions pivots is they shoulder a much heavier burden. And should they win, they will likely deserve an unequal share of the plaudits. Perhaps build the case for a World Player of the Year nomination too.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search