Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's no secret that USA Rugby have been financially f***** for years'

(Photo by Adam Pretty/Getty Images)

A Major League Rugby board member has hailed the bankruptcy of USA Rugby as a positive step forward for the growth of the sport in America – and for the country’s 2031 World Cup bid. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chapter 11 bankruptcy declaration last Monday by the American union sent shockwaves around the rugby world about the precariousness of the business of rugby in challenging times worsened by the economic ramifications of the coronavirus pandemic. 

However, James Kennedy, the majority owner of MLR club Rugby United New York, claimed the writing was on the wall for a very long time for the Colorado-based organisation. 

“It should have happened at least a year ago, if not two years ago when Dan Payne was leaving,” said Kennedy to RugbyPass. Payne quit as USA Rugby’s CEO in April 2018 for a similar role at Rugby Americas, the governing body for 23 national unions in that area.

“They were always fighting a rearguard action. There is plenty of me on the record on this, so it’s not Monday Morning Quarterback. Bankruptcy is what they needed to do. 

“It was no individual’s fault, as there was chopping and changing personnel. It was a system that was just built to fail in a weird way. It was chronically underfunded and because it was underfunded it wasn’t able to get the money it needed. 

“If they got their membership policies right they would be the wealthiest union in the world, but they couldn’t even do that because they didn’t have the money or the resources.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This needed to happen. I feel bad for vendors that are owed money, but to say the bankruptcy is because of Covid is a bit disingenuous.

“It’s no secret that US Rugby have been financially f***** for years. They overspent at the last World Cup (in Japan) and they messed up at the Sevens World Cup in San Francisco.

“They forget to factor in the cost of hotel rooms. Not just the price, they forgot to negotiate with the hotels before they were awarded the World Cup. 

“They were awarded the World Cup and then went to the hotels. The hotels were, ‘Well you’re coming here anyway, we’re not giving you a deal’. Stuff like that year on year crippled it. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Bankruptcy will just clean that up and it will make the (2031) World Cup bid process easier. I don’t want to say any names, but the void will be filled with competent people and competent organisation.”

USA Rugby’s demise should also offer Major League Rugby – a completely separate entity – the perfect opportunity to accelerate the growth it has enjoyed since its inaugural season in 2018. 

Kennedy has already been talking to local districts that had been operating under the wing of USA Rugby and the hope is they will now row in behind the MLR in the same way the NBA, basketball’s professional league, wields so much influence on that sport in America. 

“The US is broken into a raft of unions. The New York union is New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, which is called Empire Geographical Union. I will be talking to them about absorbing them for a while, taking over their membership and how we set it up. DC are trying to do the same down with their union. San Diego the same. 

“It’s a natural progression. If we rule our provinces we are fully motivated to expand the game, grow the game, gets fans at clubs, at colleges, at high schools, in our women’s programmes… it’s in all our financial interest to do that and then what I would see is a feeder model. 

“Take USA Basketball (USAB): they have men’s and women’s teams in the Olympics and various World Cups etc, but it’s a five-person office in Colorado because the NBA and the NCAA does everything.

“These (USAB) people just book a few flights every now and then because the grassroots is done by the NBA and the colleges. The country is too big for an organisation (similar to USA Rugby) to do something like that.

“It [USA Rugby’s bankruptcy] is a good thing. I say that with respect to people that have lost their jobs, people that are not getting paid, but it’s a good thing for rugby in the US ultimately. 

“If it cleans up the World Cup bid which is going on right now… anything without US Rugby involved is a better situation than having them at the table where they swear they are good when everybody knows they are not good. This is a good opportunity. 

“It will be a good chance for MLR to get out in the press and explain to the rugby public and the non-rugby public that US Rugby and MLR are separate entities and always have been for exactly this reason.

“We are the ones expanding the game. Like, we were launching a women’s professional team this year which we have now put off until next year. It’s all pretty good stuff basically.”

WATCH: Ben Foden chats to Jim Hamilton in the latest episode of The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search