Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘It’s not right for me to talk about previous games’

(Photo by World Rugby via Getty Images)

One endearing thing that you have to like about Mark Jones is that he doesn’t do bluff. His coaching vernacular is of the straight-shooting variety, a style honed in recent years at the Super Rugby-winning Crusaders. He is now working as interim Wales U20s head coach following his aborted spell at the financially collapsed Worcester.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Welsh were Six Nations age-grade wooden spoonists just a few months back under a different coaching regime and having taken charge in early May, Jones’ fingerprints are all over the general improvements witnessed in recent weeks in South Africa at the Junior World Championship.

Heading into the tournament you would have feared the Welsh could go the way of Scotland in 2019 when the event was last staged. The Scots finished 12th and were relegated, a demotion that they will only finally get the chance to rectify next week when they participate in the eight-team World Junior Trophy in Kenya.

Video Spacer

Who is the strongest rugby school in the UK | The Season 10 | Episode 2

Video Spacer

Who is the strongest rugby school in the UK | The Season 10 | Episode 2

Rather than battling relegation in Cape Town, though, a refreshed Wales have had a bit more about them, coming within a whisker of ambushing New Zealand and then showing some gas to pull away from Japan with a late flourish after some difficult early moments.

Tuesday’s pool-closing contest versus France was another level, however. The defeat wasn’t as damaging as the 67-17 battering suffered 15 weeks ago when the teams met in the Six Nations.

Related

Wales had encouraging moments in generating multiple linebreaks but the 14-man French, who ended the group stage as the No1 ranked side out of the 12 participants, always had an extra gear to convincingly win 43-17.

Despite the reduced margin, Jones wasn’t of a mind to compare the March result under Byron Hayward in Oyonnax with what materialised in Athlone. “It’s not right for me to talk about previous games,” he told RugbyPass. “I will just focus on this performance and we were below our level in this performance in terms of our execution. I am disappointed that we didn’t take a lot more of our opportunities.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We showed that we are a very dangerous team. I know they were down to 14 men for a large chunk as well, but there are definitely elements of our performance that we will be disappointed with. The guys had prepared well, they were clear on what their roles were and unfortunately, under the heat of battle, the skill set in particular hasn’t quite held up.

“The positive thing is that gives us an opportunity, gives us something to focus on. We know that we can fix our own game first before we start worrying about opposition and hopefully we can turn it around and come out of the blocks flying in the next match.”

That fifth-to-eighth-place semi-final will be against Georgia in Paarl and with New Zealand facing Australia on the other side of the draw, Wales will have two more decent fixtures to finish out the campaign. “It’s been a mixed pool,” surmised Jones about their three-game Pool A adventure which harvested seven match points to leave them ranked eighth best out of the 12 teams heading into the play-offs.

“Loads of green shoots in the first two games around our set-piece in the first game and some of our strikes from set-piece, we looked really dangerous with the ball in hand and there was some pretty decent defence in there around the phase play stuff.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The second pool match against Japan we showed great game management, good character, dealt with the conditions really well and had some good maturity from young men in what was a tight game and we got away with it in the end. What we have learned against France is you get punished if you don’t take your opportunities. It has been a very mixed pool but the tournament is not over and we have got to make sure we carry on.

“I am happy with the chances that we created. It was definitely an element of our game that was positive; we made 10 linebreaks and they made 12. Just their conversion rate was so much better than ours and we are disappointed.

“We put a lot of work into our set-piece along with other areas of our game. Boys are working incredibly hard in those areas, but we came up against a very strong team and we couldn’t quite contain them at that set-piece and that gave them the platform for their performance.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search