Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's personal': England rift alleged between Vunipola and Borthwick

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

An ex-England international has alleged that a bust-up is the reason why Billy Vunipola hasn’t figured at all this year for his country under new head coach Steve Borthwick. Previous head coach Eddie Jones had recalled the Saracens No8 for last July’s three-Test series win away to Australia and Vunipola remained the player in that England jersey for three of England’s four Autumn Nations Series matches in November, starting versus Argentina, New Zealand and South Africa and coming off the bench against Japan

ADVERTISEMENT

Vunipla was absent, though, when Borthwick named his 36-strong squad on January 16 for the 2023 championship and the coach has since named the generally misfiring Alex Dombrandt as his No8 in all four England matches – including last Saturday’s humiliating record home defeat versus France.

Given that the England back row of Lewis Ludlam, Jack Willis, Dombrandt and replacement Ben Curry were so brutally blown away by the French, former England out-half Andy Goode had hoped that Borthwick would recall Vunipola for the final match of the campaign away to Ireland next Saturday in Dublin.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However, Borthwick continued to exclude Vunipola when the squad was publicly confirmed on Monday morning and Goode, appearing on the latest edition of The Rugby Pod he hosts with Jim Hamilton, has now alleged that a bust-up with coach Borthwick is the reason for Vunipola’s continued absence.

Borthwick would have previously worked with Vunipola when he was the England assistant coach under Jones, taking charge of the forwards from 2016 through to the pandemic suspension of the 2020 Six Nations. Throughout that period, Vunipola was a regular Test pick when he was fit, but he has now been cast aside since Borthwick took charge after joining from Leicester in December.

Asked on the show about the England back row situation, Goode said: “This is the thing, pre-match doing the analysis, seven of that eight pack that monstered by France started every Six Nations game. Dombrandt, non-existent in the game, has been poor in the Six Nations. I look at the squad thinking, ‘You want some ballast, bring Billy back’. Billy ain’t there and I’m hearing the reasons around Billy not being involved in the Steve Borthwick squad is because they had a fallout. Had a fallout and Steve won’t pick him for that reason.

“From what I hear and understand it’s personal. Steve won’t pick Billy Vunipola because of what happened previously between them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Co-host Hamilton interjected that it was crazy how only last month the talk was about the England back row having so many options available and now this particular part of the team now appears to be stuck in a selection rut. Goode replied: “Well, there is one in the squad who probably makes more metres, breaks more tackles, metres after tackles, everything that you need – Ben Earl.

“He is not a massive bloke but in terms of performance of what he has done in the Premiership this year: I don’t have the stats to hand, but I’d be amazed if he is not in the most metres made bracket, most tackle busts, most metres made after contact as a player in the Premiership – and he can’t get a look in under Steve. I know he played Italy and put a kick in because that is probably what they told him to do but I can’t see England winning.”

Quizzed about what decision Borthwick will make at No10 given the current speculation is that George Ford could be a starter in Dublin, Goode, who is also a RugbyPass columnist, said: “What has George Ford done to deserve playing for England in the here and now? Off the back of an achilles injury, he has played two-and-a-half games (for Sale), has not set the world alight, and got spanked by London Irish at the weekend.

“I am bringing Manu (Tuilagi) back in the centres, so you have got to back Marcus Smith again (at 10) which probably means you have got a choice to make between Owen (Farrell) at 12, which I don’t agree with… I can’t see England winning. I can see a better performance from England, but this Ireland team is at times unplayable.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

15 Comments
K
Kate 646 days ago

That performance by Dombrandt in the weekend was the worst that I have seen by a loose forward in a test match. He was just *atrocious*.

l
lot 647 days ago

borthwick cutting off his nose to spite his face 🤔 don't think so. Borthwick is too professional to let a little dust up get in the way of winning. Might believe it if it's EJ, not borthwick. he's probably giving others chance to prove themselves. we now see dombrandt needs longer time. this rwc too soon. need to bring back BV to improve his coaching credibility. continue losing, then he is as mediocre as his playing days....

B
BigMaul 647 days ago

Seems like unsubstantiated rumour “my mate’s dog walker’s uncle told me…”. No detail or evidence to back up the claim.

Even if this were true, Billy V has had his chance time and time again and has failed to produce the goods over the last 5 years or so. He shouldn’t be picked. On ability. Borthwick has the 2 best 8s in his squad in Dombrandt and Simmonds and is right to stick with them.

There is, undoubtedly, an issue around the balance of England’s pack though. The likes of Lawes, Curry (and Underhill?) are missed and would make a big difference at 5/6(/7) respectively. Chessum and Ludlum both have shone in patches, but they’re a significant step down in quality and physicality… maybe Ribbans and Ted Hill would be better understudies to bring the required physicality.

England also need to sort out their scrum - Genge and Sinckler have been poor in that regard so far. England might be better with a Marler/Rapava-Ruskin starting at loosehead and Collier/Cole starting at tight head to give them a set piece platform.

T
Tony 647 days ago

Borthwick is just a s#%t Eddie Jones.

Not a good enough coach to make selection calls based on who's been mean to him. You need all the help you can get, probably just pick your best players.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search