Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's slightly weird for me because his dad was my idol growing up'

(Photo by Malcolm Couzens/Getty Images)

Harlequins general manager Billy Millard has spoken about the background in recently convincing Louis Lynagh – the son of Michael, the legendary World Cup-winning Wallaby – that his future is best served by staying with the Londoners rather than seek out a Super Rugby contract in his father’s native Australia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lynagh’s younger brother Tom has agreed to a deal that will take him into Queensland Reds set-up next August but Louis, the 21-year-old born in Treviso when his dad was there in 2000, felt it best to stay with Harlequins and keep developing there.

Following a Gallagher Premiership debut off the bench at Leicester in the final game of last season, Lynagh has catapulted up the Harlequins selection pecking order to make seven more league appearances this season, starting on six occasions and scoring twice on the wing.  

Video Spacer

Finn Russell guests on RugbyPass Offload with Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson

Video Spacer

Finn Russell guests on RugbyPass Offload with Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson

That emergence resulted in an unspecified length contract deal being signed on March 4 by the Harlequins academy graduate and Millard, the Australian currently overseeing the team through to the end of this season following the sudden departure of Paul Gustard, is chuffed that Lynagh has chosen to remain at The Stoop rather than seek out pastures elsewhere.    

“Louis is such a great kid. He has got leadership potential, is very professional and diligent and has great energy,” said Millard. “It’s slightly weird for me because his dad was my idol growing up. 

“Getting to know Michael a bit closer – Michael and Louis have a great relationship and Louis is just a really good fit (for Harlequins). He took his opportunity really well. You all saw it, he is a good footballer and he is just starting out. He has got a lot of competition there which he is not shying away from. He has got a big future.”

Asked if it was difficult to convince Louis to stay and not follow the Australian route his brother Tom is taking, Millard added: “I don’t think so. There were a couple of conversations there. He has got a lot of close friends here and we provided him with the opportunity and we see a long-term future for him here.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Tommy going back to the Reds, again he is his own man and that is a great opportunity for him but we were very keen for Louis to stay for a whole lot of reasons. I wouldn’t say it happened quickly but it was quite easy conversations. He asked a lot of good questions and we got there quite naturally.”

Is Louis a chip off the old block Millard was so enthralled by when he was growing up in Australia? “Different positions, so not really. Louis is a strike runner, he is playing out wide, he can play at full-back as well.

“He has got a good kick on him but his dad was the master ten back in that era and was a very good goal kicker. They are different, they are their own men but you can see similarities in the way that they move at times and just some of their little demeanours.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 12 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search