Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's so unfair, they are throwing us out of the bus'

(Photo By Seb Daly/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

These days, the phone of Harold Verster, the Cheetahs managing director, doesn’t stop trilling between five in the morning and eight at night. The South African administrator was due to retire this week, shifting his profound love of Free State rugby from the boardroom to the stands. Instead, Verster is ruminating over legal documents, scrutinising figures and briefing his players and staff about a grave predicament.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Cheetahs have effectively been jettisoned from the Guinness PRO14. The South African Rugby Union wants its four heavyweight franchises – the Bulls, Stormers, Lions and Sharks – to be the flag-bearers in the northern hemisphere, settled by a vote at a special general meeting on Tuesday.

The upshot is devastating for the Cheetahs, desperately cruel to the franchise that forged the path between South Africa and the European game since 2017. The Cheetahs, remember, were booted out of Super Rugby three years ago, deemed surplus to requirements as that competition became bloated and its relevance waned. 

Video Spacer

RugbyPass takes a trek through South Africa in this edition of Rugby Explorer

Video Spacer

RugbyPass takes a trek through South Africa in this edition of Rugby Explorer

They leaked players and coaches but have comfortably held their own in the PRO14. In effect, they have blazed a trail north for the bigger, more glamorous South African teams, only to be tossed aside again.

“Like in Super Rugby, we are on the back foot. We need to go through all the documentation to try to prove our case. It is very unfair,” Verster told RugbyPass. “We opened negotiations with the PRO14 (then PRO12) in 2017 and it was quite a difficult road to travel, to find your feet, contract players. 

“We lost a lot of players who wanted to play Super Rugby. We have lost coach Franco Smith to Italy, Rory Duncan to Worcester, Daan Human to the Boks, Dave Williams to the Sharks, and even our doctor to Dubai. We regrouped, we have got brilliant coaches, doctor, a brilliant team, one of the best teams in a long time. Suddenly this thing hits you like a lightning bolt.

“When we joined the PRO14, SARU said they appreciated our solution to being left out of Super Rugby, they called it an ‘elegant settlement’ and said in their report that it would be wonderful for South African rugby. Now they are throwing us out of the bus. It is so unfair. It is really, really frustrating. We are very unhappy with our situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

At Tuesday’s meeting, Verster says the Cheetahs proposed the standings in the forthcoming Currie Cup be used to determine which four teams joined the PRO14, but arguments and counter-claims only ended in an impasse.

The Cheetahs have been granted ‘fifth-franchise’ status, meaning they will be eligible to participate in international tournaments, if not remain in the one where they are already established. 

One idea being mooted is a Super 8 competition featuring two teams apiece from New Zealand and Australia, as well as the Cheetahs, and one representative each from Argentina, Japan and the Pacific Islands. If no amicable solution can be found, Verster says the Cheetahs will have little choice but to engage SARU through the courts.

“It depends on what content is in the Super 8 for broadcasters and sponsors and we are currently investigating that, and then we might accept it. If the content is too low and we don’t get enough from it, we have got no option but to look at alternatives,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“SARU has a contract with PRO14. We are not sure exactly what is in the contract, but we have agreements between us and SARU to show that we should be included until the 2022/2023 season. We have enough back-up – not fixed contracts, but agreements that could be seen to be contracts. 

“Our senior counsel has looked at it and we feel very comfortable that we have got a good legal case. We do not want to enter into legal battles with SARU. The last option would be legal, but if that’s the last thing to stand on, every union will obviously look at it.”

All of this will be pondered at a board meeting on Friday where Verster hopes the franchise will begin to piece together their next course of action. The stakes for Free State rugby here are monumental. The cost of facilities, a large squad and staff, and operational outgoings could be ruinous.

“If we lose out on the Super 8 and the financial model, we face serious issues, almost too serious to contemplate,” said Verster. “We sit in a stadium here that can accommodate 40,000 people – this thing costs us R9-10million a year (£470,000). The other smaller entities in smaller stadiums cost them 1.5m or so (£70,000). If we are pulled to that level with them, we are actually in a worse position than them.

“Compare us then to the big four, we can’t sustain this stadium, we can’t sustain our academy, our medical facilities, that puts us in a spot and it’s absolutely unreasonable to do it overnight.” 

Verster reels off a long list of international coaches who learned their rugby in the Free State, from Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber to Franco Smith and Neil Powell. He talks about the people’s fervour for the game and how the stadium is rammed full when the Springboks come to town.

“They say we are too small, that we are in the middle of South Africa – the proof of the pudding is in the eating,” he added. “We have a fantastic team of people and we fight like a team. We have got to pull this thing through and we will. I’m very confident we will find something.

“First-prize is to get us back into the PRO14. We have got a right to be there. They made a mistake to get us out. Why are the other four so well positioned to take the place that we rightfully deserve? If it wasn’t for Covid-19, we would be there now.

“If we are in the PRO14, we should stay there. People like us up north, the PRO14 people really want us there, but it’s not their decision. Treat us fairly, we deserve it. We don’t want to fight, we want to solve this problem as we did with Super Rugby, but please, be fair to us.”

https://www.facebook.com/rugbypass/posts/4477767485629873

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The joy, spirit and obstacles of the rugby pilgrim The joy, spirit and obstacles of the rugby pilgrim
Search