Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's time for a rethink for the New Zealand U20s after another low finish

New Zealand U20 co-captain Peter Lakai scores against Georgia at the World U20 Championships. (Source/World Rugby)

The New Zealand Under 20s are in the doldrums. At the World Rugby Championship in South Africa, they finished in seventh place with a 50-26 win over Georgia U20 after suffering their heaviest loss in tournament history to France (14-35) and then conceding their highest score against Australia (44) in another loss.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s the second consecutive tournament that New Zealand have contested a lowly consolation fixture. Since winning the first four World Championships between 2008 and 2011, New Zealand has only won twice since 2015 and has missed the semis three times in the last five tournaments.

It should be noted New Zealand played an hour against the Junior Wallabies with 14 men after Tom Allen was red-carded. However, the ‘Baby Blacks’ were no certainties of winning with a full complement after splitting a home series with Australia in June where they were outscored across two Tests.

Against the defending world champions France, the Kiwis looked out of their depth.

Does success at this tournament really matter? The fact that 913 players, including 64 All Blacks, have become internationals from it resoundingly answers that question.

Sam Whitelock, Codie Taylor, Brodie Retallick, Sam Cane, Beauden Barrett, Waisake Naholo, and TJ Perenara are just some of the long-term All Blacks to have graduated from the Under 20 World Championship.

Furthermore, it’s no coincidence as Ireland and France’s results have improved at the Under 20 level so too has the fortunes of their senior teams.

Senior World Cup-winning All Blacks coach Sir Steve Hansen observed in the New Zealand Herald recently.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our high-performance department at the moment has to be squirming at our record at under-20 level. Are we getting that business, right? I don’t think so. If we’re not winning under-20 World Cups, we’re not producing world-class players at a younger level to bring into this team [the All Blacks].”

It hasn’t been all doom and gloom in the talent department. Taha Kemara (First-Five), Macca Springer (Wing), Harry Godfrey (Fullback), and Peter Lakai (Flanker) are all individuals who’ve shown they could be very good in the senior ranks. The quartet all debuted in Super Rugby in 2023.

However, New Zealand’s set-piece implosions and failure to measure up physically have been alarming. Without tough and regular age group competition, New Zealand looks comparatively disorganised and undercooked against Northern Hemisphere opposition.

Geographical isolation, worsened by recent Covid lockdowns, is a barrier that disproportionately disadvantages New Zealand. Since when, though, has New Zealand used the excuse of being at the bottom of the world for not being able to achieve?

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand needs to rethink how it resources and prepares its leading age group talent, otherwise where will the next generation of stars come from?

The biggest issue appears to be the lack of hard, regular rugby. Combinations look cluttered, different styles appear unfamiliar, and impressive fitness scores in the gym don’t equal battle-hardened athletes.

Why don’t the New Zealand Under 20s take a leaf out of the Black Ferns book and play internal matches against men? Invitational teams, provincial unions, club sides, and a proper season of matches, following the Super Rugby Under 20s, could surely improve outcomes.

All Blacks legends Ma’a Nonu, Conrad Smith, Ali Williams, Ben Smith, and Kevin Mealamu all helped the Black Ferns in their positions. Daniel Carter taught the kickers and Sir Graham Henry cast his eye over trainings and the girls flourished.

Stronger mentoring programs are required with a particular emphasis on forward play, the style of which is often the antithesis of the New Zealand approach. The expertise of Mike Cron, Jason Ryan, and the like should be summoned.

In the NPC last year there were 183 players who debuted for the Union which they represented aged 20 years or younger. Why don’t the New Zealand Under 20s compete in the NPC?

The NPC is largely a development competition now with 2022 finalists Wellington and Canterbury having a combined 38 players in their squads who debuted at 20 or younger. Wellington won the competition with 13 of their 33 players born in 2000 or after.

Junior sides competing in senior competitions isn’t without precedent. The Wellington Phoenix Reserves for example compete in the Central and National football leagues.

Running the New Zealand Under 20s like an NPC team would create better continuity and opportunity for those competing at the World Cup and help really good prospects assimilate more successfully into a senior professional environment.

The team could be coached full-time and include an overarching mentoring role. Present coach Clark Laidlaw was previously tied up with the All Blacks Sevens for the best part of a decade. Is he as immersed as he could be in our best young XV’s prospects?

The team should take their home games to small unions and rural venues to provide isolated and disconnected grassroots fans a chance to watch quality rugby.
Unfortunately, the tumbling numbers and financial struggles of rugby clubs are complex issues not easily resolved. Weaker clubs mean fewer players and fewer pathways.

Club rugby might not be an adequate preparation ground for the rigorous of the Under 20 World Championship, but it’s better than younger players not playing at all.

The present model seems to involve the best youngsters playing a smattering of club fixtures before being wrapped in cotton wool for several weeks, playing the odd game among themselves, ticking some Academy boxes, and then getting dispatched overseas to get their butts kicked.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
P
Pecos 520 days ago

I can't remember France or Ireland winning the real RWC to be fair. Also, can an annual tournament of teenagers really be a "world cup" "world championship"?

M
Mike 528 days ago

Don't underestimate how much younger players learn off the old pros in the NPC set-ups. If you allowed them to compete locking them into one coaches environment, with no senior players I don't think it's that helpful.
Also I hope Laidlaw had some help with the tighties, but are we surprised a 7s coach produces an enterprising game plan with weakness at set piece?
This has been an historical challenge for the Hurricanes so I hope they will not be affected by the lack of concentration in these realm next year.
Also, I do wonder if our young men understand the bigger world when they're 18-19. NZ is a very sheltered society and when you're a school rugby star you might not understand that you're a big fish in a small pond. We also seem to have fallen in to the Aussie trap from 20 years ago where they started converting chunky loose forwards into front rowers because of the extra demands around the field; there will always be pain points with this.

J
Jon 529 days ago

resoundingly answers that question
And it is a clear 'No'.

I don't think being in and around that 2nd ranked bunch is a bad thing, even if all are so clearly behind France. Results have all provided pretty consistent scores between Ireland, England, Aussie, and though i'm not sure they were more under done than Aussie (supposedly you'd think they had similar prep), even New Zealand when it seemed to count were at the same level (I'm under the impression Wales hadn't been matching it with the top 6N sides). They seemed to chop and change players a lot.

Very interesting and insightful article though thank you. A lot of those factors do seem like they will be resolved now that COVID has passed. I'm wondering if the NPC is not already too reliant on these new players coming through to the top sides then? You would have the best u20 playing for their province and then have to have another big group of not so distinct athletes below them. I do prefer this avenue (quantity) rather than collecting the best 40/50 youngsters and hosing them in "academies" for the rest of their youths.

NPC has a lot of the Super Rugby stalwarts running around to guide them. Seems like a good scenario currently. Returning a few more pro's (with investment money and ideas) into the NPC and not having so many younger guys fast tracked would be preferable to me. Education as well as full time athlete "academization" please!

F
Forward pass 530 days ago

I think the two lost seasons due to covid lockdowns really hampered the development of this side. They went in ranked 7th and probably would have been 5th barring a RC. Im not concerned.

m
mike 530 days ago

So disappointing. Set pieces a shambles. Some brilliant individuals, but no team cohesion. The players did their thing, but the coaches and managers need to own this result. Could I or any armchair critic coach this team to 7th - probably, yet highly taunted coaches did!

f
flyinginsectshrimp 530 days ago

and the girls flourished.
Do you mean the women flourished? In a formal context we don't refer to grown men as boys, and neither should we refer to grown women as girls. Hell, some of the Black Ferns are probably much older than you, Adam.

J
Jmann 530 days ago

why does the RC not have an U20s comp? That seems to be the essential difference.

E
Euan 530 days ago

But for the red and yellow cards, they would have beaten Australia, and finished much higher.

B
Bruiser 531 days ago

The selection process must need review as well. Do the smaller unions and less profile schools get a proper look in.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search