Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's time to move on from Owen Farrell

Owen Farrell of England walks out of the tunnel after half time during the Six Nations Rugby match between Wales and England at Principality Stadium on February 25, 2023 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by Dan Mullan - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

On one hand, with two Six Nations wins from three games, Steve Borthwick’s England reign could be said to have made a half-decent start.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, an alternative view suggests losing at home to Scotland then struggling past Italy and woeful Wales is a slightly underwhelming effort from the world’s best-funded rugby nation.

Having come across Borthwick on a few occasions while he was in charge at Leicester, his approach to handling the media and his open, friendly approach since taking the England job from Eddie Jones has been a pleasant and very welcome surprise.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Reportedly, his behind-the-scenes staff find the former Bath and Saracens lock a likeable figure who has plenty of time for everyone. A sharp contrast therefore with his acerbic predecessor and hopefully a man who can deliver a long-term winning culture rather than the kind of electric shock therapy which brought some short-term success to teams coached by Jones.

There is no doubting that Borthwick has impeccable credentials for the top job courtesy of his brilliantly successful career as player, captain, lineout specialist, coach and more recently at the helm of a Tigers side which he transformed from relegation candidates to English champions almost overnight.

Regardless of how England fare during March or at France 2023, he should therefore be guaranteed a good run in the head coach role. Nonetheless, we also must acknowledge that should England follow the formbook and be well beaten by world no.1 and no.2 sides France and Ireland, they will unacceptably once again finish in the lower reaches of the Six Nations table.

Borthwick’s pointed comments about the side he inherited not being much good at anything are spot on as their travails in the scrum, their lack of power at the breakdown and with ball in hand and their regular disciplinary problems under Jones clearly showed. The new boss certainly has plenty on his ‘to do’ list and only limited match time before the World Cup in which to tackle it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Judged by their approach against Italy and Wales, England’s priority is to re-establish their pack’s traditional status as one of the world’s most combative outfits with a powerful scrum and lineout and a dynamic driving maul.

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count.

England almost won the 1991 World Cup with a forward pack and good kicking game, but a repeat performance is surely now impossible given the nature of the modern game. For example, South Africa’s winning team in Japan certainly had a dominant set of forwards, but also plenty of power and craft in their backline plus a pair of electric wingers.

Related

Should poor results against Ireland and France underline the veracity of this, while Borthwick will redouble his quest to beef up the forward pack he will also need to acknowledge that this will only take England so far.

ADVERTISEMENT

If they are to challenge the world’s top sides in France next year, England must develop an all-court game which mixes the sledgehammer with the rapier – and it is very difficult to see how this happens with the conservative Owen Farrell calling the shots as fly half and captain.

It can be argued that Jones (and his predecessor Stuart Lancaster) have already acknowledged this through their regular selection of George Ford at no.10 with his Wigan childhood mate outside him.

However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential.

Just as Andre Esterhuizen enabled Marcus Smith to spark Harlequins to the Premiership title, the in-form Ollie Lawrence brings the same qualities to England. This means Farrell plays at fly half or not at all.

With Ford – who led Borthwick’s Leicester to the title 12 months after Smith had done the same for Quins – returning to fitness, the two most creative talents in English rugby will shortly be at their head coach’s disposal.

Related

While recent stats may suggest otherwise, neither is as reliable from the kicking tee under pressure, not as defensively able as Farrell (not withstanding concerns about his rugby league style high shots). Twice in England’s win over Wales their captain was first in over the ball to win a turnover or slow Welsh possession and neither Ford nor Smith bring this appetite or skill set.

But, combined with a powerhouse inside centre and a footballing no.13 such as Elliot Daly or – if he can rediscover form – Henry Slade, both of Borthwick’s alternative options bring attacking flair and an ability to unlock defences by playing flat to the gain-line and putting teammates into space with well-timed sleight of hand.

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort, instead instinctively preferring to go through the phases with ball in hand. The last World Cup final showed England how long it takes to get possession from tough opponents like South Africa, so keeping it for a while when you have it seems a good idea.

Watching England in recent times, and listening to the hushed tones in which newly-selected younger players express their reverence of Farrell, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that he is the team’s dominant and shaping personality.

With the possible exception of Ford, is there anyone in the backline – and maybe the entire squad – that will challenge him? It may just be that by also making their fly half and senior player captain England have created a less-than-healthy environment with one overly-dominant voice that suffocates those around him.

It may be coincidence, but with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia last summer under the leadership of the laid-back Courtney Lawes.

Related

Borthwick installed Farrell as captain soon after taking charge, and changing direction this close to a World Cup is not ideal.

The rise of Ludlam, Jack Willis and Ollie Chessum, the return of Ben Earl and the guaranteed presence when fit of Tom Curry means Lawes is not currently a guaranteed starter.

But with his Premiership-winning skipper Ellis Genge very much part of the first XV, Borthwick also knows a replacement leader is close at hand and in the interests of being competitive in France the Farrell situation is a nettle which England’s new boss surely must grasp.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
B
BigMaul 629 days ago

Anyone claiming Billy V should be picked ahead of Dombrandt has just lost all credibility.

S
Steve 633 days ago

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort...? Smith kicked away load of possession in the games he played for England. Clearly no research has been done for this piece and its just an excuse to stick the boot into Farrell, for what reason I am unsure

l
lot 634 days ago

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count. what garbage is this??

the whole english backrow do NOT break advantage lines in all games. the worst is the 8th man. very club level skills. cant tackle, cant carry ball in traffic. england carriers are the tight fives. dan cole is reserve player and is pretty much non existent when he comes on. no carries and no presence. stuart need to replace him. and billy must replace the kindy level guy in 8th. he's not ready for this level.

l
lot 634 days ago

quite an erroneous piece of garbage this writing is. first farrell was not injured in aussie. he was replaced as skipper by lawes. his constant kicking is the game plan. even ben earle was kicking at opposition red zone. sarries would never allow that.

f
finn 634 days ago

"However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential."

I don't understand the remark about Tuilagi, given that his abandoment has occurred at the same time as the emergence of Ollie Lawrence. I'm not quite sure why England were fine with Tuilagi as a big ball carrier at 13 alongside Ford and Farrell, but the same wouldn't work with Lawrence at 13 alongside Smith and Farrell?

f
finn 634 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

f
finn 634 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

H
Huw 634 days ago

You say accuracy off the Tee for Farrell, but you presumably must have written it before yesterday's misses. I didn't note any publishing date. Farrell as a constant cramps England's style should they wish to adapt to which ever team they are playing.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 17 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

303 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search