Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's time to move on from Owen Farrell

Owen Farrell of England walks out of the tunnel after half time during the Six Nations Rugby match between Wales and England at Principality Stadium on February 25, 2023 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by Dan Mullan - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

On one hand, with two Six Nations wins from three games, Steve Borthwick’s England reign could be said to have made a half-decent start.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, an alternative view suggests losing at home to Scotland then struggling past Italy and woeful Wales is a slightly underwhelming effort from the world’s best-funded rugby nation.

Having come across Borthwick on a few occasions while he was in charge at Leicester, his approach to handling the media and his open, friendly approach since taking the England job from Eddie Jones has been a pleasant and very welcome surprise.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Reportedly, his behind-the-scenes staff find the former Bath and Saracens lock a likeable figure who has plenty of time for everyone. A sharp contrast therefore with his acerbic predecessor and hopefully a man who can deliver a long-term winning culture rather than the kind of electric shock therapy which brought some short-term success to teams coached by Jones.

There is no doubting that Borthwick has impeccable credentials for the top job courtesy of his brilliantly successful career as player, captain, lineout specialist, coach and more recently at the helm of a Tigers side which he transformed from relegation candidates to English champions almost overnight.

Regardless of how England fare during March or at France 2023, he should therefore be guaranteed a good run in the head coach role. Nonetheless, we also must acknowledge that should England follow the formbook and be well beaten by world no.1 and no.2 sides France and Ireland, they will unacceptably once again finish in the lower reaches of the Six Nations table.

Borthwick’s pointed comments about the side he inherited not being much good at anything are spot on as their travails in the scrum, their lack of power at the breakdown and with ball in hand and their regular disciplinary problems under Jones clearly showed. The new boss certainly has plenty on his ‘to do’ list and only limited match time before the World Cup in which to tackle it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Judged by their approach against Italy and Wales, England’s priority is to re-establish their pack’s traditional status as one of the world’s most combative outfits with a powerful scrum and lineout and a dynamic driving maul.

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count.

England almost won the 1991 World Cup with a forward pack and good kicking game, but a repeat performance is surely now impossible given the nature of the modern game. For example, South Africa’s winning team in Japan certainly had a dominant set of forwards, but also plenty of power and craft in their backline plus a pair of electric wingers.

Related

Should poor results against Ireland and France underline the veracity of this, while Borthwick will redouble his quest to beef up the forward pack he will also need to acknowledge that this will only take England so far.

ADVERTISEMENT

If they are to challenge the world’s top sides in France next year, England must develop an all-court game which mixes the sledgehammer with the rapier – and it is very difficult to see how this happens with the conservative Owen Farrell calling the shots as fly half and captain.

It can be argued that Jones (and his predecessor Stuart Lancaster) have already acknowledged this through their regular selection of George Ford at no.10 with his Wigan childhood mate outside him.

However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential.

Just as Andre Esterhuizen enabled Marcus Smith to spark Harlequins to the Premiership title, the in-form Ollie Lawrence brings the same qualities to England. This means Farrell plays at fly half or not at all.

With Ford – who led Borthwick’s Leicester to the title 12 months after Smith had done the same for Quins – returning to fitness, the two most creative talents in English rugby will shortly be at their head coach’s disposal.

Related

While recent stats may suggest otherwise, neither is as reliable from the kicking tee under pressure, not as defensively able as Farrell (not withstanding concerns about his rugby league style high shots). Twice in England’s win over Wales their captain was first in over the ball to win a turnover or slow Welsh possession and neither Ford nor Smith bring this appetite or skill set.

But, combined with a powerhouse inside centre and a footballing no.13 such as Elliot Daly or – if he can rediscover form – Henry Slade, both of Borthwick’s alternative options bring attacking flair and an ability to unlock defences by playing flat to the gain-line and putting teammates into space with well-timed sleight of hand.

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort, instead instinctively preferring to go through the phases with ball in hand. The last World Cup final showed England how long it takes to get possession from tough opponents like South Africa, so keeping it for a while when you have it seems a good idea.

Watching England in recent times, and listening to the hushed tones in which newly-selected younger players express their reverence of Farrell, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that he is the team’s dominant and shaping personality.

With the possible exception of Ford, is there anyone in the backline – and maybe the entire squad – that will challenge him? It may just be that by also making their fly half and senior player captain England have created a less-than-healthy environment with one overly-dominant voice that suffocates those around him.

It may be coincidence, but with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia last summer under the leadership of the laid-back Courtney Lawes.

Related

Borthwick installed Farrell as captain soon after taking charge, and changing direction this close to a World Cup is not ideal.

The rise of Ludlam, Jack Willis and Ollie Chessum, the return of Ben Earl and the guaranteed presence when fit of Tom Curry means Lawes is not currently a guaranteed starter.

But with his Premiership-winning skipper Ellis Genge very much part of the first XV, Borthwick also knows a replacement leader is close at hand and in the interests of being competitive in France the Farrell situation is a nettle which England’s new boss surely must grasp.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
B
BigMaul 659 days ago

Anyone claiming Billy V should be picked ahead of Dombrandt has just lost all credibility.

S
Steve 664 days ago

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort...? Smith kicked away load of possession in the games he played for England. Clearly no research has been done for this piece and its just an excuse to stick the boot into Farrell, for what reason I am unsure

l
lot 664 days ago

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count. what garbage is this??

the whole english backrow do NOT break advantage lines in all games. the worst is the 8th man. very club level skills. cant tackle, cant carry ball in traffic. england carriers are the tight fives. dan cole is reserve player and is pretty much non existent when he comes on. no carries and no presence. stuart need to replace him. and billy must replace the kindy level guy in 8th. he's not ready for this level.

l
lot 664 days ago

quite an erroneous piece of garbage this writing is. first farrell was not injured in aussie. he was replaced as skipper by lawes. his constant kicking is the game plan. even ben earle was kicking at opposition red zone. sarries would never allow that.

f
finn 664 days ago

"However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential."

I don't understand the remark about Tuilagi, given that his abandoment has occurred at the same time as the emergence of Ollie Lawrence. I'm not quite sure why England were fine with Tuilagi as a big ball carrier at 13 alongside Ford and Farrell, but the same wouldn't work with Lawrence at 13 alongside Smith and Farrell?

f
finn 664 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

f
finn 664 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

H
Huw 664 days ago

You say accuracy off the Tee for Farrell, but you presumably must have written it before yesterday's misses. I didn't note any publishing date. Farrell as a constant cramps England's style should they wish to adapt to which ever team they are playing.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search