Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It's time to move on from Owen Farrell

Owen Farrell of England walks out of the tunnel after half time during the Six Nations Rugby match between Wales and England at Principality Stadium on February 25, 2023 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by Dan Mullan - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

On one hand, with two Six Nations wins from three games, Steve Borthwick’s England reign could be said to have made a half-decent start.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, an alternative view suggests losing at home to Scotland then struggling past Italy and woeful Wales is a slightly underwhelming effort from the world’s best-funded rugby nation.

Having come across Borthwick on a few occasions while he was in charge at Leicester, his approach to handling the media and his open, friendly approach since taking the England job from Eddie Jones has been a pleasant and very welcome surprise.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Reportedly, his behind-the-scenes staff find the former Bath and Saracens lock a likeable figure who has plenty of time for everyone. A sharp contrast therefore with his acerbic predecessor and hopefully a man who can deliver a long-term winning culture rather than the kind of electric shock therapy which brought some short-term success to teams coached by Jones.

There is no doubting that Borthwick has impeccable credentials for the top job courtesy of his brilliantly successful career as player, captain, lineout specialist, coach and more recently at the helm of a Tigers side which he transformed from relegation candidates to English champions almost overnight.

Regardless of how England fare during March or at France 2023, he should therefore be guaranteed a good run in the head coach role. Nonetheless, we also must acknowledge that should England follow the formbook and be well beaten by world no.1 and no.2 sides France and Ireland, they will unacceptably once again finish in the lower reaches of the Six Nations table.

Borthwick’s pointed comments about the side he inherited not being much good at anything are spot on as their travails in the scrum, their lack of power at the breakdown and with ball in hand and their regular disciplinary problems under Jones clearly showed. The new boss certainly has plenty on his ‘to do’ list and only limited match time before the World Cup in which to tackle it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Judged by their approach against Italy and Wales, England’s priority is to re-establish their pack’s traditional status as one of the world’s most combative outfits with a powerful scrum and lineout and a dynamic driving maul.

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count.

England almost won the 1991 World Cup with a forward pack and good kicking game, but a repeat performance is surely now impossible given the nature of the modern game. For example, South Africa’s winning team in Japan certainly had a dominant set of forwards, but also plenty of power and craft in their backline plus a pair of electric wingers.

Related

Should poor results against Ireland and France underline the veracity of this, while Borthwick will redouble his quest to beef up the forward pack he will also need to acknowledge that this will only take England so far.

ADVERTISEMENT

If they are to challenge the world’s top sides in France next year, England must develop an all-court game which mixes the sledgehammer with the rapier – and it is very difficult to see how this happens with the conservative Owen Farrell calling the shots as fly half and captain.

It can be argued that Jones (and his predecessor Stuart Lancaster) have already acknowledged this through their regular selection of George Ford at no.10 with his Wigan childhood mate outside him.

However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential.

Just as Andre Esterhuizen enabled Marcus Smith to spark Harlequins to the Premiership title, the in-form Ollie Lawrence brings the same qualities to England. This means Farrell plays at fly half or not at all.

With Ford – who led Borthwick’s Leicester to the title 12 months after Smith had done the same for Quins – returning to fitness, the two most creative talents in English rugby will shortly be at their head coach’s disposal.

Related

While recent stats may suggest otherwise, neither is as reliable from the kicking tee under pressure, not as defensively able as Farrell (not withstanding concerns about his rugby league style high shots). Twice in England’s win over Wales their captain was first in over the ball to win a turnover or slow Welsh possession and neither Ford nor Smith bring this appetite or skill set.

But, combined with a powerhouse inside centre and a footballing no.13 such as Elliot Daly or – if he can rediscover form – Henry Slade, both of Borthwick’s alternative options bring attacking flair and an ability to unlock defences by playing flat to the gain-line and putting teammates into space with well-timed sleight of hand.

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort, instead instinctively preferring to go through the phases with ball in hand. The last World Cup final showed England how long it takes to get possession from tough opponents like South Africa, so keeping it for a while when you have it seems a good idea.

Watching England in recent times, and listening to the hushed tones in which newly-selected younger players express their reverence of Farrell, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that he is the team’s dominant and shaping personality.

With the possible exception of Ford, is there anyone in the backline – and maybe the entire squad – that will challenge him? It may just be that by also making their fly half and senior player captain England have created a less-than-healthy environment with one overly-dominant voice that suffocates those around him.

It may be coincidence, but with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia last summer under the leadership of the laid-back Courtney Lawes.

Related

Borthwick installed Farrell as captain soon after taking charge, and changing direction this close to a World Cup is not ideal.

The rise of Ludlam, Jack Willis and Ollie Chessum, the return of Ben Earl and the guaranteed presence when fit of Tom Curry means Lawes is not currently a guaranteed starter.

But with his Premiership-winning skipper Ellis Genge very much part of the first XV, Borthwick also knows a replacement leader is close at hand and in the interests of being competitive in France the Farrell situation is a nettle which England’s new boss surely must grasp.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
B
BigMaul 754 days ago

Anyone claiming Billy V should be picked ahead of Dombrandt has just lost all credibility.

S
Steve 758 days ago

Most relevantly, both only kick away possession in their opponent’s half as an absolute last resort...? Smith kicked away load of possession in the games he played for England. Clearly no research has been done for this piece and its just an excuse to stick the boot into Farrell, for what reason I am unsure

l
lot 758 days ago

To this end, the return of Dan Cole and the selection (and old-style non-substitution of Jamie George) has shored up the setpiece. In addition, the presence of Alex Dombrandt, Lewis Ludlam and Ollie Lawrence has brought a gain-line threat and by putting England more regularly on the front foot shrunk their breakdown penalty count. what garbage is this??

the whole english backrow do NOT break advantage lines in all games. the worst is the 8th man. very club level skills. cant tackle, cant carry ball in traffic. england carriers are the tight fives. dan cole is reserve player and is pretty much non existent when he comes on. no carries and no presence. stuart need to replace him. and billy must replace the kindy level guy in 8th. he's not ready for this level.

l
lot 758 days ago

quite an erroneous piece of garbage this writing is. first farrell was not injured in aussie. he was replaced as skipper by lawes. his constant kicking is the game plan. even ben earle was kicking at opposition red zone. sarries would never allow that.

f
finn 758 days ago

"However, since Billy Vunipola’s effectiveness declined and England belatedly acknowledged that they cannot build a side around the rarely-fit Manu Tuilagi, a ball-carrying presence at inside centre has become essential."

I don't understand the remark about Tuilagi, given that his abandoment has occurred at the same time as the emergence of Ollie Lawrence. I'm not quite sure why England were fine with Tuilagi as a big ball carrier at 13 alongside Ford and Farrell, but the same wouldn't work with Lawrence at 13 alongside Smith and Farrell?

f
finn 758 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

f
finn 758 days ago

"with Farrell absent through injury, England’s best spell of the last two years brought an impressive series win in Australia"

Farrell played all three tests against Australia. In fact, he played every minute.

H
Huw 759 days ago

You say accuracy off the Tee for Farrell, but you presumably must have written it before yesterday's misses. I didn't note any publishing date. Farrell as a constant cramps England's style should they wish to adapt to which ever team they are playing.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 1 hour ago
'Matches between Les Bleus and the All Blacks are rarely for the faint-hearted.'

“….after hyping themselves up for about a year and a half”


You see, this is the disrespect I am talking about. NZ immediately started this character assasination on Irish rugby after the series win “about a year and a half” before the RWC. We win in NZ and suddenly we are arrogant. Do you consider this respectful?

And please substantiate Ireland talking themselves up comment: for every supposed instance of this there is surely 100x examples of NZ talking themselves up?

We were ranked 1, but that’s not talking ourselves up. We were playing good rugby.


Re the QF: that was a one score match: if you say we ‘choked’ you are really saying that Ireland were the better team but pressure got to them on the day? That is demeaning to your own team and another example of disrespect to Ireland.


New Zealand:

-NZ’s year long prep included a wall defence that Ireland had not seen until the match.

-Insights on all players strenghts and weaknesses. The scrum coach said that he had communicated several times with Barnes about Porter. He also noted when Barnes was looking at Porter he was NOT looking at the NZ front row.

-A favourable draw meaning NZ would play Ireland in a QF, where Ireland would not have a knock out win under their belt.

-A (another) favourable scheduling meant that NZ could focus on the QF literally after the France match and focus on Ireland after they beat SA in the pool.


Ireland:

-Unfavourable draw: have to play the triple world cup champions with players having multi RWC knock out match winning caps in the QF, when Ireland DONT want to play a top 4 team.

-Unfavourable schedule: Have to play world no 5 Scotland 6-7 days before the quarter. Have to prepare for this which compares unfavourably with NZs schedule (Uruguay 9 days before QF). Both wingers get injured with no time to recover.

-Match: went 13-0 down but came back. Try held up brilliantly by Barrett and last play of the match saw Ireland move from their own 10 metre line to 10 metres from the NZ line.

Jordan himself said that the NZ line was retreating and someone needed to do something which was Whitelock.


Ireland died with their boots on. You saw the reaction from NZ after the whistle. Claiming Ireland choked is disrespectful to NZ and to a great rugby match. It is also indicative of the disrespect shown by NZ and fans to Ireland since 2022. We saw it in some NZ players having a go at Irish players and supporters after the whistle. Is that respect?

50 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Drought-busting win over Brumbies gives Waratahs platform to build on Drought-busting win over Brumbies gives Waratahs platform to build on
Search