Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's very easy when you lose a man to hit the panic button'

(Photo by Michael Steele/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Freddie Steward has shared his delight in Marseille about how England reacted so brilliantly to having to play with 14 men for their 77 minutes in their Rugby World Cup opener versus Argentina.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were only three minutes gone on the clock at Stade Velodrome when Tom Curry was yellow-carded for his head-on-head contact with Juan Cruz Mallia.

That sanction was soon upgraded to red by the foul player review officer but England reacted brilliantly to their third yellow-upgraded-to-red card in four matches, going on to beat the Pumas 27-10.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Those previous reds – for Owen Farrell in the 64th minute versus Wales in London and Billy Vunipola in the 53rd minute in Dublin – had given Borthwick’s team a taste of how to cope with being a red-carded man down.

It was also just six months ago when Steward himself was red-carded on the stroke of half-time in Dublin (a punishment rescinded to yellow at a subsequent midweek disciplinary hearing).

Related

Marseille became the jackpot payout for all those man-down experiences. “Definitely, when you have been somewhere before it’s always easier to channel that. Throughout this whole pre-season there has still been genuine belief,” enthused Steward.

“It’s been said a lot; these are the games that matter. Coming into a World Cup, regardless of our form, we started on zero points. We had to be tough. Obviously, we lost Tom early on and I suppose it’s the ultimate test isn’t it: When you go a man down, can you still find something? We did.”

ADVERTISEMENT

George Ford was the jewel in the English crown, stroking over all 27 points that his try-less team scored. “He is one of those players that make it look so easy. He makes everyone else look great and that is the telling side of a player like George.

“He is a dream to play with. It’s so nice when you stand behind him and he is slotting drop goals for fun, it makes everyone else’s life a lot easier. He is such a tactician.

“It’s very easy when you lose a man to hit the panic button and everyone’s like ‘argh’ and heads are in the air, but George was ice cool about it and when you have one person doing it, it radiates around the team.

“To have someone like him at 10, you just trust him. You trust that he is going to make the right decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
B
Bob Marler 468 days ago

Kiwi fans take note. You can win 14 vs 15.

M
Mark 468 days ago

Fair play to England, they turned up, stood up and played intelligently.
Ford delivering a masterclass in game management and keeping the scoreboard ticking over.
Curry's red was ridiculously harsh.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search