Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It's what needed to happen': Wilkinson's message to bruised England side

Kyle Sinckler, Alex Dombrandt, Max Malins, Jack van Poortvliet and Jamie George of England look dejected during the Six Nations Rugby match between England and France at Twickenham Stadium on March 11, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

England’s legendary flyhalf Jonny Wilkinson has offered a philosophical view of the 53-10 defeat at the hands of defending Grand Slam champions France.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Cup-winning No 10s perspective comes from personal experience after Wilkinson was involved in previous heavy defeats, suffering a 76-0 loss to Australia in 1998 and a 58-10 loss to South Africa in 2007.

In both cases England rebounded from the losses to have success, winning one World Cup in 2003 and making the final in the other 2007.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Wilkinson believed that the defeat will help the side reach the bottom from which they can shed themselves of false beliefs, allowing for a re-birth to occur following a mindset change.

His personal experience from the defeat to the Wallabies ended up as a ‘cleansing opportunity’ which enabled him to experience growth as a player.

“It’s really interesting because it’s what needs to happen, there is no other way around it,” Wilkinson explained to the ITV post-game show.

“It’s not a wrong turn, it’s not the end of the path, this is the path.

“In that 1998 game for me it was a real cleansing opportunity to realise the story of who I thought I was could no longer carry on.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was almost forced to change. And in that change I found brand new possibility.”

The former England flyhalf also didn’t think this meant that success is years away, pointing to his experience in 2007 leading to his second World Cup final appearance.

England were heavily beaten in the summer by the Springboks in South Africa and returned to face them at that year’s World Cup.

“In Bloemfontein in 2007, yes in the summer there we lost a game by 50 points, within three months we were in a World Cup final,” he recalled.

“It doesn’t mean ‘oh this means years and years of this’, it has to happen. It’s a massive humility check in all kinds of ways.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Not that those guys are arrogant but it is realising that an evolution needs to take place and it is a huge learning experience.

“If there is that desire and intention to push on, it will turn into something bigger and better.

“However long that takes, I don’t know. Which players will be there and which won’t, I don’t know.”

Related

It doesn’t get any easier for England who have to face Ireland next week, the world’s current number one ranked side and favourites to complete a Grand Slam.

They will travel to Dublin to face Andy Farrell’s side at home which could be a ceremonious occasion should Ireland defeat Scotland on Sunday.

Despite the result against France, Wilkinson believed the team will feel less burdened now that the worst has happened.

“I think that team will come out lighter next time on the field,” he said.

“They’ll feel more bouncy on their feet. They won’t feel heavier because of this defeat.

“In that Ireland game I think there will be a freshness in the team.

“They can say ‘yeah okay let’s stop pretending’ and give it a crack.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search