Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Chris Ashton explains why England are failing to develop wingers

(Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Imagesges)

Former England winger Chris Ashton has criticized Eddie Jones’s conservative approach to rugby, blaming it for ruining England wingers’ potential.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ashton argues that it has prevented many talented wingers from making their mark on the England team and suggests that a more open selection policy under Steve Borthwick could benefit the squad by introducing fresh talent and dynamism.

Ashton was largely shut out during the Jones’ England era, but when he did play he says training sessions left him out in the cold.

“It seems that every year, England always has a winger that we get excited about,” Ashton says. “We’ve had some fantastic wingers, but we haven’t seen someone breakthrough in the last few years for England. Why is that?

“The reason we haven’t seen someone really establish themselves in the wing position or break onto the scene with the same impact and ability that they show week-in, week-out in the Premiership is because of the way England have played over the last few years.

“I’ve been in England training sessions where I wouldn’t touch the ball for the entirety of them. How are wingers supposed to be able to make an impact when they aren’t seeing any of the ball in training? There were a number of occasions where wingers were going into games cold and would find themselves in the same situation in a match with so few touches of the ball. I used to get so frustrated about it.

“The kicking style and set piece style that was so successful under Eddie Jones, a style that worked for so many years until the end, was seen as the norm for wingers. It was a case of do your job and take the opportunity when it comes, but that style doesn’t make the most of talented players like Ollie Hassell-Collins who need touches of the ball and confidence from their coaches.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Players like him play in teams that move the ball from wing to wing, which is how they have an impact on the game. They don’t do it through kick-chasing or kick-competing, so it limits the number of wingers that England have been able to trust to play that style of rugby.

Chris Ashton
Chris Ashton and Eddie Jones – PA

“From what I saw against Italy, it looks like England are trying to move away from that approach under Steve Borthwick. It looks like we’re trying to play, and we went through some good phases. That will help the wingers,” concluded Ashton.

Chris Ashton was speaking with Gambling Zone. Read the full interview here.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

19 Comments
A
Anthony 317 days ago

CHRIS. It was a pleasure to watch you play. Rugby needs characters like you most of all now. They are all BORING . Marcus excepted. The supporters have all been brain washed by Eddie, Steve Borthwick too.
In a week that Barry John has died , it reminded us of how PROPER no 10,s used to play . Mix it up. Side step , drop goal , dash though the gap . England have boring kick artists whose only attribute is an up and under , AND are lauded for it !!! it shows how we have all been suckered into the game plan by boring dunderheads .
Hopefully what goes round etc. We are all bored to hell . Marcus/Fin will have their day . SOON.

f
finn 317 days ago

What an odd thing to say. England moved the ball about far more under Eddie than under Steve.

C
Colin 317 days ago

Spot on Mr Ashton.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search