Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What was Jaco van Heerden thinking? The weirdest refereeing performance of the Super Rugby season

Piers Francis (Photo: Getty Images)

Remember back at the start of the year when World Rugby decided to crack down on high tackles? If you do, you’re doing better than referee Jaco van Heerden.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues’ 30-22 loss to the Stormers at Newlands leaves them 10 points adrift of the Highlanders at the bottom of the New Zealand conference. While they still have a better record than any Australian team, their chances of making the playoffs are pretty much zilch.

Obviously most of the reasons for that is down to the Blues painfully poor conference record. But there was one incident in Friday night’s game that they can feel fairly hard done by. It came when an Englishman playing for the New Zealand side got KO’d by a New Zealander playing for the South African one.

The big story earlier in the year was the aforementioned action on high tackles, with the northern hemisphere feeling the brunt of the implementation growing pains. We saw a fair few odd calls and at least one that controversially changed the outcome of a game, but, for the sake of reducing concussion, it seemed to have worked.

However, after watching Shaun Treeby’s hit on Piers Francis on Sunday morning showed you could be forgiven for thinking the initial flurry of cards and penalty tries were just for show.

I’ve watched a lot of Treeby over the years – he’s originally from Wellington and racked up a half-century of games for the Highlanders before reemerging in Cape Town. He’s hardly what you’d call a dirty player, but his swinging arm that connected with Blues first five Francis’ jaw was about as textbook a high shot as you can get.

The verdict from van Heerden was a penalty only, after consulting with the TMO. This despite the fact that whole reason for the crackdown on these in the first place was right there, lying face down just metres away from him. Francis was out cold.

ADVERTISEMENT

He went to the sideline, where a concussion test confirmed that he wasn’t going to be rejoining the action. It is a pretty far-reaching moment for the Blues, as their first-choice first five now faces a mandatory stand down period while they try and salvage their season.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

If that wasn’t bad enough, Blues winger Matt Duffie found out the hard way that van Heerden hadn’t just left his cards at home when he made the Treeby decision. Duffie, who has been in otherwise great form this season, got his first yellow after repeated team infringements, then a professional foul with a quarter of an hour to go.

So a guy who got himself involved in a few too many rucks got a red card, while the guy who illegally injured an opponent out of the game remained on the field.

On top of that, Stormers lock Eben Etzebeth got to spend 10 in the sin bin for little more than exchanging some colourful language with Sonny Bill Williams in the first half.

ADVERTISEMENT

All you can ask from a referee is consistency. But for all the bluster from the game’s governing body about player welfare only a few months ago, maybe van Heerden is the one who needs a concussion test.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search