Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jake White was spitting after Bulls loss to Stormers

Vodacom Bulls head coach Jake White before the United Rugby Championship match between Ulster and Vodacom Bulls at Kingspan Stadium in Belfast. (Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White did his best tap-dance to put forward a humble disposition, but could not resist the temptation to point out what he felt were ‘inconsistencies’ by match officials.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Firstly, we have to be humble,” White started off his post-match media briefing after his team suffered a 21-33 loss to the Stormers in their United Rugby Championship quarterfinal in Cape Town at the weekend.

The Stormers were impressive in all aspects of the game, as they put down a marker in defence of their title – reaching their second successive home semifinal.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The Stormers played really well,” the Bulls’ boss continued, adding: “Credit to the Stormers, they’re champions, they’ve got a good team.

“They’ve got an incredible record here [Cape Town]. They’ve got 10 incumbent Springboks.”

White made it clear he felt some of the calls were not consistent with the messages they received from the refereeing brains trust during the season.

He suggested some of the calls from referee Jaco Peyper and TMO Marius Jonker were in contrast to what they had received from the URC refereeing panel under the management of Tappe Henning.

It started with a head-knock to star flyhalf Johan Goosen.

“Someone whacked him on the head in a tackle,” the Bulls boss said of the HIA call that went against Goosen in the 42nd minute.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A couple of those head-to-head clashes no one saw,” White said, adding: “I watched a Test match where some of those tackles, you get red-carded.

“And tonight, [the] best referee [Peyper] and the best TMO [Jonker] in South Africa, [say there is] nothing wrong.”

It did not stop there, as his teaser saw the media probe for more detail on his feeling about those ‘questionable’ calls.

“I am not going to give you the whole run-down,” White said, adding: “A lot of work goes into preparing video clips of things.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The answers are that [those tactics] won’t be allowed. Then you see the same pictures in a game, and it is allowed.”

He made it clear there needs to be more consistency between what is being told to teams before a game and what happens in a game.

Related

“One thing that we are going to have to work out is how can we, through the URC, find a way to get [consistency].

“I’ve heard that there is zero tolerance on hands past the ball on the ground, but it didn’t look like that tonight.

“I heard that if you sack a maul, and it’s a tackle, you can’t lie on top of the ball. But that didn’t happen tonight either.”

White then complimented the Stormers for playing and adapting to how match officials rule on the day.

“To be fair, that’s what the Stormers do well: you’ve got to adapt to that.

“They do it well and they are very good at it.

“For argument’s sake, one of the things that they did really well is that they play the support runner in the breakdowns, and then got over the ball.

“[They] never once got penalised for taking out the support runner without the ball.

“But credit to them.

“They obviously worked very hard on the breakdown, and it works for them.

“They’ve got a good set-piece, and defend well.

“So, if I analyse the game, it’s funny how we went 7-0 down and I actually said: ‘I don’t want the ref to give a penalty at scrum time when someone slips’. Then we were 10-0 down.

“When you are 10-0 down against the Stormers, it’s incredible because you have to chase the game.

“Their defence is so good that once you have to start chasing the game, you must put yourself under pressure.”

White was also not happy about the yellow card issued when flank Cyle Brink took out counterpart Hacjivah Dayimani near the tryline.

“I saw exactly the same picture on the other side of the field when the captain asked the official: ‘Didn’t he tackle him head to head’?

“And then he said: ‘No, he didn’t have the ball’.

“I didn’t know you could tackle a guy without the ball.

“For me, it was a yellow card against Cyle for exactly the same picture as against Keagan Johannes in the other corner.

“So, I repeat, I think we’re going to need to find a way [to get consistency].

“We’ve spent a lot of time and effort – and [South Africa’s Director of Rugby] Rassie [Erasmus] taught you this many months ago, putting videos together asking about it – and then you see the pictures and then you don’t get any joy from the same pictures.

“I am saying it again.

“I’ve got a lock [Charlie Ewels] playing for the Bulls against the Sharks [in the Currie Cup] he got red carded in a Test match for exactly the same tackle that I saw in this game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
C
Colm 592 days ago

I've never seen a soith African team when it wasnt the fault of the officials

J
Jacque 593 days ago

Nothing new with Peyper & Jonker. They are the WORST.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING James O'Connor on Crusaders preseason: 'I haven't experienced anything like it' O'Connor on Crusaders preseason
Search