Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jake White's reaction to Bulls home loss in front of URC record crowd

:Vodacom Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White during the European Rugby Champions Cup Pool A match between Exeter Chiefs and Vodacom Bulls at Sandy Park on December 17, 2022 in Exeter, England. (Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White refused to make any excuses following his team’s 19-23 defeat to the Stormers at Loftus Versfeld on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bulls dominated the opening exchanges of the North-South derby which was attended by a Southern Hemisphere URC record crowd of 41 205.

They enjoyed much of the possession and territory and took a 12-3 lead after just 30 minutes of play thanks to the boot of Chris Smith.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the hosts lost their intensity and allowed the Stormers into the match, who eventually scored two tries to retain their stranglehold in the fierce rivalry.

“It is really not nice.” White said, adding: “We dominated the possession and territory, and we trailing 12-13 at the break.

“But we will get better, and I don’t have any doubt that as players and coach, we will get it right.

“I think there is not a player in the team who didn’t give it his all and that is all you can ask for as a coach.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The North-South derby was not short of any drama and per usual accompanied by a couple of contention officiating decisions.

The first one that might have Bulls fans raise a few eyebrows is the try by Marcel Theunissen.

Stormers scrumhalf Herschel Jantjies showed great vision to find Theunissen unmarked with a wide pass on the left for the Stormers No.8 to go over untouched from 22 metres out.

Related

Both passes of Jantjies in the build-up looked questionable, but referee Marius van der Westhuizen and TMO deemed there was no evidence to overrule the on-field decision and the try was awarded.

Bulls supporters also have a right to feel aggrieved about the David Kriel yellow card for the deliberate knockdown.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the Bulls boss opted to not ‘moan’ about referee calls and instead focused on his team’s missed chances.

“The forward pass [the TMO] was looking at was probably the wrong one, it probably should’ve been the one going inside not outside,” the Bulls Director of Rugby said.

“I also don’t think [Kriel] knocked it down, but that’s my view, it happens. Those are the margins. If he catches that, we score under poles.

“But that is how strict they are about it now, it was almost as if he was guilty before he even caught the ball, but I’m not going to moan about the referee or give you guys a front headline news story ‘Jake White says referees’. It is what it is.

“Even with 14 men, even with a yellow card, maybe we should’ve scored there, we still had two chances in the last two minutes of the game to finish it off and we didn’t.”

On the decision-making in the closing stages, which saw the Bulls waste a couple of good scoring opportunities, White explained his team – especially the captain Ruan Nortje – will get those calls ‘right’ as the season progresses.

“I’m not going to nail anybody because I’ve seen this movie before, we lost fair and square,” White said.

“We had a chance at the end and I think we should’ve adapted better, and we have to learn those things as we go deeper in this competition.”

White further explained: “My captain [Ruan Nortje] will get it right. He’s going through a tough time now with calls, and people double-guessing whether or not he’s making the right calls.

“I’ve been through this with [former Springbok captain] John Smit, I’ve been through this with young captains – he’ll learn, he’ll get better.

“He’s not happy and has probably dropped his head and is down on himself, but he knows how important his role is. But we’ll help him through this time.”

The Bulls are now sixth on the log and 13 points behind the Stormers in the South African Conference.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search