Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Could James Haskell's banter derail the Lions?

haskell

In the run up to the 2003 Rugby World England head coach Sir Clive Woodward emphasized the importance of detail, and took addressing the minutiae of the England’s game to the next level.

ADVERTISEMENT

To paraphrase the philosophy – ‘If we do 100 things one per cent better’ we will be victorious. Indeed Woodward cited the importance of ‘critical non – essentials’ (CNEs), believing them to be key to England’s World Cup success in 2003.

Yet what about negative one percenters? The tiny things – that individually seem negligible – but that collectively can lead to the downfall of a team.

The enormous touring party, the individual hotel rooms for players and the presence of former Labour spin doctor Alastair Campbell were all widely considered detrimental in Woodward’s failed 2005 Lions tour.

Fast forward to the present day.

Enter James Haskell and the British and Irish Lions.

Haskell has been touted as that oldest of rugby clichés – the “good tourist” – he may not be pushing for a test place but he’s a good guy to have around camp.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed many fans – this one included – are looking forward to the prospect of Haskell’s videos surfacing on social media over the course Lions tour, not least how his relationship with reluctant ‘best mate’ Owen Farrell develops.

Yet is there a negative side effect to having Haskell – and more specifically Haskell’s overwhelming level of banter – in the squad?

Haskell is the type of character that the game of Rugby Union needs. Colourful, brash and with a quick turn of phrase, the self proclaimed ‘Bishop of Banterbury’ prides himself on mixing it with the best chatters in the business.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what people don’t like to talk about is the unspoken tyranny of banter. For banter bullies, if you possess ‘s*** banter’, then it’s a massive slight on your personality.

Haskell himself has frequently alluded to his own lack of tolerance for people who don’t have ‘good banter’. In a video addressed to his fans in March he unashamedly spoke of blocking anyone with ‘s*** comments, s*** banter, terrible chat’.

It would seem if the Bantersaurus Rex deems your banter unworthy, you don’t get a seat at the ‘banter table’.

Such are the whims of a banter tyrant.

And what of his British and Irish Lions teammates? It’s not impossible to imagine quieter players being intimidated by a perceived need to give and take banter.

It may come as a shock to some, but not everyone is good at banter, and not everyone likes it to start with.

Let’s hope for the sake of a competitive series that banter doesn’t become an overarching distraction in one of the most grueling Lions tours ever conceived.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

Singapore SVNS | Day 2

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year

It really all depends of how much overseas players would be paid (by NZR) to play for the All Blacks. I’ve not heard a peep on this front from any author suggesting it’s a good idea.


If it’s nothing (a player gets his weekly paycheck from the club and thats it (which we know is definitely not the case in Ireland and France, or SA even I think?), then maybe it would retain more SR level players given that they’ll be getting the “AB” component (which is about where things stand, Burke for instance would have had to had his Sader contract upgraded to an AB one (think above Pero levels) to be on similar money.


I’d having to imagine if a player is getting paid to do nothing over the international windows though, they are going to want to get paid extra for appear for the ABs, so in this situation, it’s hard to see many players being retained, yes.


I’m pretty sure they flew to Japan and met in person.


I’ve heard/had these discussions numerous times. I don’t think theres anyway to judge the interest that would be retain in SR. For one, it might be a more entertaining league as a result, as the JRLO is compared to Europe, despite it obviously being a lesser standard.


If SRP is of a lesser standard and now able to use Japanese and American players to bolster teams, perhaps those markets more than make up for the downturn in NZ and Aus? Perhaps it gives NZR flexibility to create a more fit for purpose interdomestic competition, and interest actually increases? All you might need is a proper pathway from school to pro?


Razor asked NZR to keep an open mind. Did NZR answer any of these questions to themself?

25 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Kyren Taumoefolau All Blacks stance splits opinions on eligibility

Yeah of course it can be, it manages a good commerical outcome when 100 million people are following it. I’m saying rugby is no where near even remotely close to getting the payoff you’re talking about, never mind the distinct lack of anyway to implement it.


So you’re going for the dirty approach. I’m not surprised, it’s the only way to easily implement it right now. I wouldn’t see the benefit to doing that myself. A draft, if purely feasible in it’s own right, doesn’t need to provide commercial benefit at all (if it works, that’s all it needs to do, as it no doubt did back in america’s heyday). But without the advantageous backing of sponsors and interest levels, if you pick the wrong method to implement it, like a dirty approach, you do potential harm to it’s acceptance.


The aspect’s of the approach you chose that I don’t like, is that the franchises are the ones spending the money of the U20’s only for there opposition to get first dibs. Personally, I would much prefer an investment into a proper pathway (which I can’t really see SR U20s being at all in anycase). I’m not exactly sure how the draft works in america, but I’m pretty sure it’s something like ‘anyone whishing to be pro has to sign for the draft’, and results in maybe 10 or 20% of those being drafted. The rest (that accumulative 80/90% year on year) do go back into club, pronvincial, or whatever they have there, and remain scouted and options to bring in on immediate notice for cover etc. You yes, you draw on everybody, but what is generating your interest in the drafties in the first plaec?


This is your missing peace. If some come through school and into the acadamies, which would be most, you’ve currently got three years of not seeing those players after they leave school. Those that miss and come in through club, maybe the second year theyre in the draft or whatever, aged 20/21, you’re going to have no clue how they’ve been playing. NPC is a high level, so any that are good enough to play that would already be drafted, but some late bloomers you might see come in NPC but then Sky’s not going to broadcast that anymore. So what’s generating this massive interest you’re talking about, and most importantly, how does it tie in with the other 7 clubs that will be drafting (and providing) players outside of NZ?


Is the next step to pump tens of millions into SRP U20s? That would be a good start for investment in the youth (to get onto international levels of pathway development) in the first place but are fans going to be interested to the same level as what happens in america? Baseball, as mentioned, has the minor leagues, if we use that model it hasn’t to be broad over the whole pacific, because you’re not having one draft right, they all have to play against each other. So here they get drafted young and sent out into a lower level thats more expansive that SR, is there interest in that? There would be for large parts, but how financially viable would it be. Twiggy tried to get a league started and NPC clubs joined. BOP and Taranaki want SR representation, do we have a mix of the biggest clubs and provinces/states make a couple of divisions? I think that is far more likely to fan interest and commerical capabilities than an U20 of the SR teams. Or ofc Uni fits a lot of options. I’ve not really read anything that has tried to nut out the feasability of a draft, it can certainly work if this spitballing is anything to go by, but I think first theres got to be a need for it far above just being a drafting level.

36 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Bulls star Willie le Roux makes U-turn on club future Bulls star Willie le Roux makes U-turn on club future
Search