Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

James O'Connor to agree extra behaviour clauses in new contract - reports

It looks like O'Connor will need to sign extra behaviour clauses if he is to reignite his Wallaby career. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Sale Sharks agreed to release James O’Connor from his contract at the club on Tuesday, in order for the versatile back to return to Australia and push for inclusion in the Wallaby squad for the upcoming Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

O’Connor’s previous time in Australia had been marred by off-field controversies, the last of which resulted in the ARU ending its contractual agreement with the player, who shortly thereafter left the Melbourne Rebels and moved to Europe.

He had stints at London Irish and Toulon, as well as a season with the Reds, before agreeing to join Sale in 2017, a club which has become infamous for its willingness to take gambles on players with chequered pasts.

Danny Cipriani, Marlon Yarde and Denny Solomona have all searched for redemption in the north-west and it seems as if Sale’s correctional ways will once again be put to the test as O’Connor leaves the club for a new challenge.

According to The Sydney Morning Herald, O’Connor’s contract with the Reds has been held up by the side’s desire to include extra behavioural clauses in the agreement.

With the franchise having been hurt by off-field incidents with Karmichael Hunt and James Slipper in the past, not to mention O’Connor’s own indiscretions at the Rebels and more recently in Europe, it seems they are seeking to cover themselves should the back’s return to Australia not go as planned.

O’Connor, 28, has 44 caps for the Wallabies, although the last of them came in 2013, with the playmaker having been in the international wilderness since then. His earlier move to the Reds was in order to try and make the national team for the 2015 Rugby World Cup, something which didn’t happen, and O’Connor will be hoping that he has more success this time around.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following Israel Folau’s sacking by the ARU, there is potentially a hole in the Wallaby line-up at 15. If Dane Haylett-Petty moves over to fill it, that opens up space on the wing, whilst a similar move for Kurtley Beale would free up the 12 jersey.

Whatever way Michael Cheika opts to go over the next few months, O’Connor’s ability to play all three back three positions and both centre spots puts him in a strong place to be the kind of versatile utility back that are so coveted in the 31-man Rugby World Cup squads.

Watch: World Rugby comes under fire for ‘elite’ women’s tournament

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search