Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jamie Roberts reckons an Exeter 'weakness' running off 9 can help Racing to Euro glory

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Jamie Roberts believes that Wasps’ dismantling of Bristol in last weekend’s Premiership has given Racing 92 a blueprint to help them defeat Exeter in this weekend’s Champions Cup final. Backing his old club to win the decider at Ashton Gate, Roberts claimed what Wasps achieved in their Premiership semi-final highlighted a tactic that Racing could potentially use to great effect against the Chiefs. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In conversation with Dylan Hartley on the latest episode of RugbyPass Offload, Roberts said: “If we look at the way Wasps dismantled Bristol, that is a footprint for Racing to beat Exeter. I mean that in the way that they [Exeter] have this strict pattern of play. 

You kind of know what is coming with Exeter, the way they play off the touchline, the shapes of their forwards as they run off 9, their phase play shape. 

Video Spacer

Exeter’s Rob Baxter talks to the media ahead of Saturday’s Champions Cup final

Video Spacer

Exeter’s Rob Baxter talks to the media ahead of Saturday’s Champions Cup final

“Wasps had done their homework on Bristol. Bristol have a similar shape how they play, you know what’s coming, it’s bloody hard to defend against. They [Wasps] went after they contact area like anything else. 

“They went after the contract area and the back row lads from Wasps absolutely cleaned up. If Racing are really studious, they will see weaknesses in the shapes Exeter run off 9, especially their forwards. 

“Often they are a bit short at those first rucks. I just think they have an opportunity there and if Exeter aren’t careful their game plan could unravel. But here’s me, watch Exeter now put 40 on them.”

Young Jack Maunder has become the first-choice Exeter No9 in recent months in the wake of Nic White’s return to Australia, and Hartley backed up Roberts’ assessment about shape. “I’m with you there, all these teams have really good shape. Bristol have it, Exeter have it, Northampton I experienced that. It all relies on speed of ball. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“You can have perfect shape but if the contact area is slowed down it basically gives defensive lines time to reconnect and create width to match that sort of attacking width. If Exeter can generate quick ball their attack and shape become effective, but basically the contact area, slowing ball speed, that will be crucial.”

Roberts responded: “Racing will go after Exeter. Bath couldn’t do it. And the other thing Bath struggled with is they just didn’t have that punch in the wider channels. When they got the ball to width they were so far behind the gain line they never crossed it in the wider channels. 

“They needed to flatten up in those wider channels. They had the skills to get the ball there and Exeter are happy for you to go there because they will back their push defence but there are opportunities there and with the likes of (Virimi) Vakatawa, (Simon) Zebo, (Juan) Imhoff in those wider channels they could cause far more problems than what Bath caused.

– To listen to RugbyPass Offload on iTunes, click here

ADVERTISEMENT

https://open.spotify.com/episode/5BV8ZVT2NWOMG8vZOy2Bmn

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 36 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search