Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Japan player ratings vs Samoa | Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup

Seungsin Lee of Japan. Photo by Toru Hanai - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images

In the Semi-Finals of the Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup 2024, Japan faced Samoa in a highly anticipated rematch of their RWC 2023 Pool B clash. Driven by a strong desire to reach the finals on home soil, Japan emerged victorious once again with a score of 49-27.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how Japan rated

1. Shogo Miura – 5

Showed stability in the scrum but needs to enhance his speed and explosiveness during phase play to make a stronger impact on the field. At the breakdown, he sometimes struggled with Samoa’s pressure, leading to a missed tackle that resulted in Samoa’s first try.

2. Mamoru Harada – 7

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

In Sakate Atsushi’s absence due to injury, Harada demonstrated his reliability as a starting hooker in set-pieces. During phase play, he showcased his running skills, helping advance the forward pack.

3. Shuhei Takeuchi – 6

Displayed stability in set-pieces, reacted well to loose balls, and remained resilient around the breakdown. Known for his strong ball-carrying ability, more consistent explosiveness in his game would be ideal.

4. Ratu Epeneri Uluiviti – 7

ADVERTISEMENT

His integration with the team was so smooth that it was hard to tell it was his debut
match. His athleticism contributed to a high line-out success rate, and he was
frequently involved in play as a ball carrier.

5. Warner Dearns – 7

His physicality was particularly effective in defence. Leveraging his size, he consistently applied pressure in aerial contests like opposition line-outs and kick-offs.

6. Amato Fakatava – 8

ADVERTISEMENT

A dynamic player who consistently advanced the gain-line, regardless of where he received the ball. His individual skills were crucial in pushing the gain line further during Japan’s attacking phases.

7. Kanji Shimokawa – 6

Notable plays were scarce in the first half, but his involvement became more evident in the second half. His dedicated work rate led to an opportunity in the 45th minute, where he reacted to a line-break effectively.

8. Faulua Makisi – 7

Despite Samoa’s physicality, he remained combative, especially around the breakdown, reacting well to loose balls and defending effectively.

Defence

181
Tackles Made
77
22
Tackles Missed
19
89%
Tackle Completion %
80%

9. Shinobu Fujiwara – 9

Samoa struggled to cope with Fujiwara’s attacks, conceding penalties as they focused heavily on him around the breakdown. In the 57th minute, he showcased his individual strength by spreading the ball swiftly in enemy territory and scoring a try by himself at the end.

10. Harumichi Tatekawa – 7

The veteran stepped up as fly-half for the first time since RWC 2015. By aggressively attacking the line and distributing the ball effectively, he played a key role in creating scoring opportunities despite Samoa’s physicality.

11. Malo Tuitama – 8

Responded immediately during transitions and turnovers, getting involved with the ball and driving Japan forward. His running skills and explosiveness in tight spaces were instrumental in igniting Japan’s attack.

12. Nicholas McCurran – 7

Though less visibly prominent compared to his midfield partner, his depth control, ball transfer, and work rate in the breakdown made him an unsung hero in the back line.

13. Dylan Riley – 8

The former POM’s consistent contribution was crucial on both sides of the ball. Scored the game’s first try just six minutes after kick-off by gathering Lee’s kick behind the Samoan defence.

14. Tomoki Osada – 7

Possesses the power and running skills to break through defences. Scored a try 15 minutes into the first half after collecting Lee’s kick pass. Improved coordination with teammates could further enhance his individual brilliance.

15. Seungsin Lee – 10

Playing at fullback gave him ample time and space to display his high skill level, directly contributing to try-scoring opportunities. He set up Riley and Osada with precise kick passes, scoring a try himself and achieving 100% conversion success (6/6), earning him Player of the Match honours.

Penalties

10
Penalties Conceded
7
1
Yellow Cards
0
0
Red Cards
0

Reserves

16. Kenta Matsuoka – N/A

Earned his first cap for Japan.

17. Takato Okabe (for Shogo Miura) – 5
Considering that he substituted with 30 minutes remaining in the second half, his speed and work rate did not fully meet expectations.

18. Keijiro Tamefusa (played 20 mins – for Takeuchi) – 6

When Japan chose to scrum from a near-goal penalty in the 77th minute, he helped the forward pack to win an advantage with strong scrummaging.

19. Isaiah Collins-Mapusua (played 20 mins – for Ulu) – 6

Demonstrated a high work rate and aggression in both ball carrying and defence.

20. Tiennan Costley (played 19 mins – for Makisi) – 7

His commitment and physicality were evident whether starting or coming off the bench. In the second half, his presence was crucial in preventing the opposition from finding easy opportunities for a comeback.

21. Taiki Koyama – 6

Maintained the tempo of attacks initiated by Fujiwara, keeping Japan’s momentum going. With stable ball handling, he fulfilled his role as a finisher.

22. Yusuke Kajimura (played 10 mins) – N/A

Returned to the national team for the first time since November 2022 and was called up after the pool phase of the PNC.

23. Taichi Takahashi (played 19 mins – for Tatekawa) – 6

Although he couldn’t react in time to a bouncing ball in the 70th minute, he made up for it by breaking through the defence to score a try just before full-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode
Search