Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Joe Marler's 'nut grab' and subsequent Gareth Thomas joke delight nearly everyone... but not this former England 10

(Photo by Charlotte Wilson/Offside via Getty Images)

Andy Goode has taken fellow rugby pundit Gareth Thomas to task over a joke he made in the aftermath of the Joe Marler nut grab on Welsh skipper Alun Wyn Jones in today’s Six Nations’ match in London.

ADVERTISEMENT

Marler grabbed the Welshman’s genitalia in the opening minutes of the game and it was the talk of the social media as a result.

During ITV’s half-time commentary, openly gay rugby pundit and former Welsh star Garth Thomas joked that: “It’d never happened in my day, and I’m upset about that, as I’d never have retired.”

It was joke that delighted his fellow pundits and the vast majority of the television audience, but one former player didn’t find it so funny – step forward Andy Goode.

Goode tweeted: “Imagine if someone touched another man or woman up in the workplace and then someone joked about it on TV. People have admiration for Gareth Thomas with what he’s been through and opened up about but I wonder if something similar was done in a homophobic way he’d joke about it?”

https://twitter.com/AndyGoode10/status/1236378514816929793

He followed that tweet up with: “People think it’s funny but the values our game has been built around aren’t in great shape at the minute!”

https://twitter.com/AndyGoode10/status/1236386205224370176

The vast majority of those tweeting found Thomas’ joke hilarious, although a minority appeared to side with the former England 10’s take on it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tries by Anthony Watson, Elliot Daly and Manu Tuilagi have driven England to a more convincing victory over Wales than the 33-30 scoreline suggested, but what the result means for the coronavirus-hit European Six Nations championship remains to be seen.

England led 20-9 at the break and looked to be running away with Saturday’s game after going 33-16 up after an hour but, down to 13 men after a yellow card for prop Ellis Genge and a red for centre Tuilagi for a dangerous tackle, they were cut open for two late tries.

England’s third successive victory takes them to 13 points, level with unbeaten France, who play in Scotland on Sunday. Ireland are on nine points, also with two games remaining.

For Wales, it was a third successive defeat, a year after winning the Grand Slam.

ADVERTISEMENT

England will now have to wait for a rearranged date for their final game in Italy, hoping that France slip up in one of their last two games to open the door to the title. Ireland are also in limbo over their home game against Italy, originally scheduled for earlier on Saturday.

“Whenever we felt we got control Wales are so good at staying in the fight,” said England’s man of the match Ben Youngs.

“They battled hard and our discipline gave they easy leg-ups. They are clinical enough to punish you. It was tight in the end.

“We always try to come out with intensity and did that. We were able keep hold of game and control of it early on, a bit like they did in the second half. Rugby is bizarre at times.”

England struck early after Maro Itoje won a towering lineout and Youngs fired a superb reverse pass to Watson. The winger still had work to do but his remarkable ability to find space saw him jink past Tomos Williams.

Wales stayed in the game with two Leigh Halfpenny penalties but they were short of ideas when they had the ball, routinely kicking away possession.

England were comfortably on top and eventually razor-sharp passin g by Owen Farrell and George Ford sent Daly over in the left corner.

Farrell converted both tries and added two penalties to make it 20-9 at halftime.

But within a minute of the restart they were back within four points after England’s defence fell apart from their own kickoff, allowing Wales to pour through at pace and send flanker Justin Tipuric under the posts.

Twickenham was stunned, but England quickly regained control of the ball, territory and scoreboard, with two more penalties for a 10-point lead.

That was stretched to a decisive 17 when patient and sustained attacking allowed Tuilagi to walk in the third try.

– Additional reporting AAP

WATCH: Jim discusses the ramifications of the Six Nations going behind a pay wall and no longer being shown on free to watch TV.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 23 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

305 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search