Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Joe Schmidt is not easing his way back into All Blacks camp

Joe Schmidt. (Photo by Brett Phibbs/Photosport)

According to senior players, new assistant coach Joe Schmidt is already making his mark on the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Schmidt, who coached the Irish national side for the seven years up to and including the 2019 Rugby World Cup, was initially set to take on the responsibilities of a selector and analyst for the All Blacks during the Rugby Championship.

He was temporarily thrust into a more hands-on role when head coach Ian Foster and a number of his assistants were struck down with Covid in July and Schmidt has now permanently taken over as attack coach following the recent dismissals of John Plumtree and Brad Mooar.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The 56-year-old’s first challenge will be ensuring the All Blacks remain as penetrative against Argentina this weekend as they did against the Springboks at Ellis Park in their most recent encounter in South Africa.

With that edict on his mind, it’s somewhat no surprise that Schmidt has quickly got stuck into his work with the New Zealand national side ahead of Saturday’s match-up with Los Pumas in Christchurch.

Related

“We got a little bit of an insight into Joe and got to know him a wee bit that first week against the Irish so to have him in camp full-time is a real privilege, we’re excited to work with him,” said All Blacks captain Sam Cane on Tuesday.

“He’s already stamped his mark in a couple of areas. He’ll be predominantly looking after attack and attack structure. We’ve had a few sessions in the classroom with him already and it’s good to have him on the field.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Fullback Jordie Barrett noted that while Schmidt was only two days deep into his time with the All Blacks, he’d been clued into how the well-travelled coach operates by some of the members of the Blues side in the squad who had spent the season under Schmidt’s tutelage.

“It’s only been 48 hours but it’s been positive,” Barrett said. “It’s early doors and I’ll be looking to pick his brain like the rest of the coaches and help prepare the best I can.

“He certainly hasn’t eased his way back into training. He’s a confident coach and he watches a lot of clips from what I’ve been hearing. I’ve got a little bit of a tip-off from the Blues boys where his strengths are so I’ll be looking to get the best out of them.”

While coach Foster took charge of the attack for the two-week trip to South Africa, he’ll now move back into his regular overarching role. Jason Ryan was also brought into the set-up ahead of the Rugby Championship as forwards coach while Greg Feek and Scott McLeod have maintained their positions as scrum and defence coaches, respectively.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
B
Brett 850 days ago

As long as he can find a way to get drop cane

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search